Literature DB >> 16085345

Volunteer human subjects' understandings of their participation in a biomedical research experiment.

Norma Morris1, Brian Bàlmer.   

Abstract

The paper focuses on how volunteer human subjects in research understand their own participation in experimentation. We ask how they view their own role, the experimental setting, and how they articulate their understanding of the researcher-subject relationship. The empirical basis of the study is participant-observation and qualitative semi-structures interviews with volunteers in an experimental setting far removed from the more commonly studied randomised control trial (RCT), namely, the early stage testing of a prototype instrument for breast imaging. Analysis of this empirical data leads us to conclude that research subjects do not conform solely to one or other of the models of the researcher-subject relationship suggested in the literature. Rather, the interaction needs to be considered as a social situation which volunteer subjects actively negotiate in real time. They move through multiple roles and identities as part of the navigation through unfamiliar social territory, in order to establish a relationship in which they can feel socially comfortable and appropriately valued.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16085345     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  16 in total

1.  Research, engagement and public bioethics: promoting socially robust science.

Authors:  Martyn D Pickersgill
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Peering into the pharmaceutical "pipeline": investigational drugs, clinical trials, and industry priorities.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher; Marci D Cottingham; Corey A Kalbaugh
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Assessing research participants' perceptions of their clinical research experiences.

Authors:  Rhonda G Kost; Laura M Lee; Jennifer Yessis; Barry S Coller; David K Henderson
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 4.689

4.  An Exploration of the Protective Effects of Investigators' Ethical Awareness upon Subjects of Drug Clinical Trials in China.

Authors:  L Zhang; X X Huang; H F Chen
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 1.352

5.  "If I could in a small way help": motivations for and beliefs about sample donation for genetic research.

Authors:  Marsha Michie; Gail Henderson; Joanne Garrett; Giselle Corbie-Smith
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Peruvian Female Sex Workers' Ethical Perspectives on Their Participation in an HPV Vaccine Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Brandon Brown; Mariam Davtyan; Celia B Fisher
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2014-08-14

7.  Feeding and Bleeding: The Institutional Banalization of Risk to Healthy Volunteers in Phase I Pharmaceutical Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher
Journal:  Sci Technol Human Values       Date:  2015-03-01

8.  Practicing research ethics: private-sector physicians & pharmaceutical clinical trials.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  The patient's experience of being a human subject.

Authors:  Susan Kerrison; Sophie Laws; Mary Cane; Alan Thompson
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Gaining control over breast cancer risk: Transforming vulnerability, uncertainty, and the future through clinical trial participation - a qualitative study.

Authors:  Christine Holmberg; Katie Whitehouse; Mary Daly; Worta McCaskill-Stevens
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2015-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.