Literature DB >> 21673819

Breast Sonography - 2D, 3D, 4D Ultrasound or Elastography?

Christian Weismann1, Christian Mayr, Heike Egger, Alena Auer.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: The aim of this publication is to give an answer to the question whether 2D, 3D and 4D sonography of the breast can be replaced by elastography or whether elastography is an adjunct tool to B-mode imaging. The Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS) ultrasound (US) descriptors of a lesion besides vascularity are based on B-mode imaging. US elastography displays the mechanical tissue properties. This information can be obtained by freehand compression and decompression. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) produces stress with low-frequency push pulses. Manual compression by the transducer is not necessary. Shear wave elastography (SWE) is the combination of ARFI and the measurement of the consecutive shear wave propagations in the tissue. A quantification of the elasticity in kilopascal (kPa) is offered. Discussing B-mode imaging and elastography combined with the literature, elastography is seen as an addition to B-mode imaging with the potential to increase the specificity of the B-mode imaging-based BI-RADS assessment. In spite of additional elasticity information, the sensitivity remains high. A time-saving diagnostic algorithm for 2D, 3D US and elastography is described. In conclusion, it must be said that elasticity is not a stand-alone US modality able to replace 2D and 3D sonography.

Year:  2011        PMID: 21673819      PMCID: PMC3104899          DOI: 10.1159/000327504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)        ISSN: 1661-3791            Impact factor:   2.860


  31 in total

1.  BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features.

Authors:  Andrea S Hong; Eric L Rosen; Mary S Soo; Jay A Baker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.

Authors:  Elizabeth Lazarus; Martha B Mainiero; Barbara Schepps; Susan L Koelliker; Linda S Livingston
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Diagnostic algorithm: how to make use of new 2D, 3D and 4D ultrasound technologies in breast imaging.

Authors:  C F Weismann; L Datz
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Timothy J Hall; Amy M Sommer; Gina K Hesley; Gale A Sisney; William E Svensson; Jason P Fine; Jinfeng Jiang; Nicholas J Hangiandreou
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Effects of a microbubble contrast agent on breast tumors: computer-assisted quantitative assessment with color Doppler US--early experience.

Authors:  S Huber; T Helbich; J Kettenbach; W Dock; I Zuna; S Delorme
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional US.

Authors:  Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon; Joo Hee Cha; Sun Mi Kim; Boo-Kyung Han; Eun-Kyung Kim; Mi Hye Kim; Soo Young Chung; Hye-Young Choi; Jung-Gi Im
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Breast tumors: computer-assisted quantitative assessment with color Doppler US.

Authors:  S Huber; S Delorme; M V Knopp; H Junkermann; I Zuna; D von Fournier; G van Kaick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Characterization of benign and malignant solid breast masses: comparison of conventional US and tissue harmonic imaging.

Authors:  Joo Hee Cha; Woo Kyung Moon; Nariya Cho; Sun Mi Kim; Seong Ho Park; Boo-Kyung Han; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Jeong Mi Park; Jung-Gi Im
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?

Authors:  Oswald Graf; Thomas H Helbich; Michael H Fuchsjaeger; Gottfried Hopf; Margarita Morgun; Claudia Graf; Reinhold Mallek; Edward A Sickles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging.

Authors:  Mickael Tanter; Jeremy Bercoff; Alexandra Athanasiou; Thomas Deffieux; Jean-Luc Gennisson; Gabriel Montaldo; Marie Muller; Anne Tardivon; Mathias Fink
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  8 in total

1.  Five-dimensional ultrasound system for soft tissue visualization.

Authors:  Nishikant P Deshmukh; Jesus J Caban; Russell H Taylor; Gregory D Hager; Emad M Boctor
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Diagnostic value of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification for benign and malignant breast lesions with different sizes.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Li-Xia Zhao; Guang Xu; Ming-Hua Yao; Ai-Hong Zhang; Hui-Xiong Xu; Rong Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

3.  Comparison of Sonography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis to Locate Intramammary Marker Clips.

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; P Dankerl; G Dilbat; M Bani; P A Fasching; K Heusinger; M P Lux; C R Loehberg; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; D L Wachter; M Uder; M Meier-Meitinger; B Brehm
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Ultrasound Real-Time Tissue Elastography Improves the Diagnostic Performance of the ACR Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in Differentiating Malignant from Benign Thyroid Nodules: A Summary of 1525 Thyroid Nodules.

Authors:  Shufang Pei; Bin Zhang; Shuzhen Cong; Juanjuan Liu; Suqing Wu; Yuhao Dong; Lu Zhang; Shuixing Zhang
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.257

Review 5.  Target motion management in breast cancer radiation therapy.

Authors:  Elham Piruzan; Naser Vosoughi; Seied Rabi Mahdavi; Leila Khalafi; Hojjat Mahani
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Elastic modulus of muscle and tendon with shear wave ultrasound elastography: variations with different technical settings.

Authors:  Brian Chin Wing Kot; Zhi Jie Zhang; Arthur Wai Chun Lee; Vivian Yee Fong Leung; Siu Ngor Fu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evaluation of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification, a new shear wave velocity imaging method, for breast lesion assessment by ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael Golatta; Mirjam Schweitzer-Martin; Aba Harcos; Sarah Schott; Christina Gomez; Anne Stieber; Geraldine Rauch; Christoph Domschke; Joachim Rom; Florian Schütz; Christof Sohn; Jörg Heil
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Shear-Wave Elastography Assessments of Quadriceps Stiffness Changes prior to, during and after Prolonged Exercise: A Longitudinal Study during an Extreme Mountain Ultra-Marathon.

Authors:  Pierre Andonian; Magalie Viallon; Caroline Le Goff; Charles de Bourguignon; Charline Tourel; Jérome Morel; Guido Giardini; Laurent Gergelé; Grégoire P Millet; Pierre Croisille
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.