Literature DB >> 17904779

Diagnostic algorithm: how to make use of new 2D, 3D and 4D ultrasound technologies in breast imaging.

C F Weismann1, L Datz.   

Abstract

The aim of this publication is to present a time saving diagnostic algorithm consisting of two-dimensional (2D), three-dimensional (3D) and four-dimensional (4D) ultrasound (US) technologies. This algorithm of eight steps combines different imaging modalities and render modes which allow a step by step analysis of 2D, 3D and 4D diagnostic criteria. Advanced breast US systems with broadband high frequency linear transducers, full digital data management and high resolution are the actual basis for two-dimensional breast US studies in order to detect early breast cancer (step 1). The continuous developments of 2D US technologies including contrast resolution imaging (CRI) and speckle reduction imaging (SRI) have a direct influence on the high quality of three-dimensional and four-dimensional presentation of anatomical breast structures and pathological details. The diagnostic options provided by static 3D volume datasets according to US BI-RADS analogue assessment, concerning lesion shape, orientation, margin, echogenic rim sign, lesion echogenicity, acoustic transmission, associated calcifications, 3D criteria of the coronal plane, surrounding tissue composition (step 2) and lesion vascularity (step 6) are discussed. Static 3D datasets offer the combination of long axes distance measurements and volume calculations, which are the basis for an accurate follow-up in BI-RADS II and BI-RADS III lesions (step 3). Real time 4D volume contrast imaging (VCI) is able to demonstrate tissue elasticity (step 5). Glass body rendering is a static 3D tool which presents greyscale and colour information to study the vascularity and the vascular architecture of a lesion (step 6). Tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI) is used for a slice by slice documentation in different investigation planes (A-,B- or C-plane) (steps 4 and 7). The final step 8 uses the panoramic view technique (XTD-View) to document the localisation within the breast and to make the position of a lesion simply reproducible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17904779     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  8 in total

1.  Five-dimensional ultrasound system for soft tissue visualization.

Authors:  Nishikant P Deshmukh; Jesus J Caban; Russell H Taylor; Gregory D Hager; Emad M Boctor
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Ultrasound: a strategic issue for radiology?

Authors:  Lorenzo E Derchi; Michel Claudon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparison between different imaging techniques in the evaluation of malignant breast lesions: can 3D ultrasound be useful?

Authors:  Paola Clauser; Viviana Londero; Giuseppe Como; Rossano Girometti; Massimo Bazzocchi; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Breast Sonography - 2D, 3D, 4D Ultrasound or Elastography?

Authors:  Christian Weismann; Christian Mayr; Heike Egger; Alena Auer
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 5.  Three-dimensional ultrasound of the neonatal brain: technical approach and spectrum of disease.

Authors:  Jessica Kurian; Susan Sotardi; Mark C Liszewski; William A Gomes; Thomas Hoffman; Benjamin H Taragin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-01-05

Review 6.  Three-dimensional ultrasound as a predictor of pregnancy in patients undergoing ART.

Authors:  Cemil Yaman; Richard Mayer
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2012-06-01

Review 7.  Molecular breast imaging.

Authors:  Michael O'Connor; Deborah Rhodes; Carrie Hruska
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.512

8.  The contribution of three-dimensional power Doppler imaging in the preoperative assessment of breast tumors: a preliminary report.

Authors:  K Kalmantis; C Dimitrakakis; Ch Koumpis; A Tsigginou; N Papantoniou; S Mesogitis; A Antsaklis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.