Literature DB >> 25684789

Comparison of Sonography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis to Locate Intramammary Marker Clips.

R Schulz-Wendtland1, P Dankerl2, G Dilbat3, M Bani4, P A Fasching4, K Heusinger4, M P Lux4, C R Loehberg4, S M Jud4, C Rauh4, C M Bayer4, M W Beckmann4, D L Wachter5, M Uder2, M Meier-Meitinger1, B Brehm1.   

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the accuracy of sonography versus digital breast tomosynthesis to locate intramammary marker clips placed under ultrasound guidance. Patients and
Methods: Fifty patients with suspicion of breast cancer (lesion diameter less than 2 cm [cT1]) had ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy with placement of a marker clip in the center of the tumor. Intramammary marker clips were subsequently located with both sonography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Results: Sonography detected no dislocation of intrammammary marker clips in 42 of 50 patients (84 %); dislocation was reported in 8 patients (16 %) with a maximum dislocation of 7 mm along the x-, y- or z-axis. Digital breast tomosynthesis showed accurate placement without dislocation of the intramammary marker clip in 48 patients (96 %); 2 patients (4 %) had a maximum clip dislocation of 3 mm along the x-, y- or z-axis (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The use of digital breast tomosynthesis could improve the accuracy when locating intramammary marker clips compared to sonography and could, in future, be used to complement or even completely replace sonography.

Entities:  

Keywords:  digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT); intramammary clip marker system; ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy

Year:  2015        PMID: 25684789      PMCID: PMC4318733          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1396164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  31 in total

1.  Experimental phantom lesion detectability study using a digital breast tomosynthesis prototype system.

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; E Wenkel; M Lell; C Böhner; W A Bautz; T Mertelmeier
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2006-12

2.  US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  L Liberman; T L Feng; D D Dershaw; E A Morris; A F Abramson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  The evolving practice pattern of the breast surgeon with disappearance of open biopsy for nonpalpable lesions.

Authors:  V J Zannis; K M Aliano
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Interobserver reliability of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) interpretation and agreement of ABVS findings with hand held breast ultrasound (HHUS), mammography and pathology results.

Authors:  Michael Golatta; Dorothea Franz; Aba Harcos; Hans Junkermann; Geraldine Rauch; Alexander Scharf; Florian Schuetz; Christof Sohn; Joerg Heil
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Interdisciplinary GoR level III Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up Care of Breast Cancer: Short version - AWMF Registry No.: 032-045OL AWMF-Register-Nummer: 032-045OL - Kurzversion 3.0, Juli 2012.

Authors:  R Kreienberg; U-S Albert; M Follmann; I B Kopp; T Kühn; A Wöckel
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Breast Cancer Risk - From Genetics to Molecular Understanding of Pathogenesis.

Authors:  P A Fasching; A B Ekici; D L Wachter; A Hein; C M Bayer; L Häberle; C R Loehberg; M Schneider; S M Jud; K Heusinger; M Rübner; C Rauh; M R Bani; M P Lux; R Schulz-Wendtland; A Hartmann; M W Beckmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  Epidemiology of Breast Cancer - Current Figures and Trends.

Authors:  N Eisemann; A Waldmann; A Katalinic
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  [Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous core needle breast biopsy (CNBB) versus open surgical biopsy (OSB) of nonpalpable breast lesions: metaanalysis and cost evaluation for German-speaking countries].

Authors:  R Gruber; R Bernt; T H Helbich
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2007-12-05

Review 9.  Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures.

Authors:  Matthew Wallis; Anne Tardivon; Anne Tarvidon; Thomas Helbich; Ingrid Schreer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.034

10.  Diagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of nonpalpable breast lesions.

Authors:  R M Pijnappel; M van den Donk; R Holland; W P Th M Mali; J L Peterse; J H C L Hendriks; P H M Peeters
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-02-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of a Marker Clip System in Sonographically Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Breast Cancer Localization Before and After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; P Dankerl; M R Bani; P A Fasching; K Heusinger; M P Lux; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M G Schrauder; M W Beckmann; M Uder; B Brehm; C R Loehberg
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Evaluation of a Wireless Localization System for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions - Feasibility and Cost-effectiveness in Everyday Clinical Routine.

Authors:  Patrik Pöschke; Julius Emons; Felix Heindl; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Sebastian Jud; Ramona Erber; Carolin C Hack; Caroline Preuss; Annika Behrens
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.406

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.