Literature DB >> 26550234

Diagnostic value of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification for benign and malignant breast lesions with different sizes.

Hui Liu1, Li-Xia Zhao1, Guang Xu1, Ming-Hua Yao1, Ai-Hong Zhang2, Hui-Xiong Xu1, Rong Wu1.   

Abstract

The study was to explore diagnostic value of the virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ) in distinguishing benign and malignant breast lesions of variable sizes. We performed conventional ultrasound and VTIQ in 139 breast lesions. The lesions were categorized into three groups according to size (group 1, ≤ 10 mm; group 2, 10-20 mm; and group 3, > 20 mm), and their mean, min, and max shear wave velocities (SWVs) were measured. Diagnoses were confirmed by pathological examination after surgery or needle biopsy. Receiver-operating characteristic curves (ROC) were constructed to determine the optimum cut-off values, calculate the area under curve (AUC), the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for each velocity. For all groups, the mean, min, and max SWVs of malignant lesions were significantly higher than those of benign lesions (P < 0.05). The cut-off values of mean, min, and max SWVs were not significantly different among the three groups. In addition, the diagnostic performance of mean, min, and max SWV values is analogous, regardless of lesion size. In conclusion, VTIQ is a strong complement to conventional ultrasound, which is a promising method in the differential diagnosis of the breast lesions with different sizes. Further studies validate our results as well as reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies, regardless of size is warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic value; breast lesions; different sizes; virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ)

Year:  2015        PMID: 26550234      PMCID: PMC4612919     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  31 in total

Review 1.  Sonographic breast elastography: a primer.

Authors:  Richard G Barr
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Discordant elastography images of breast lesions: how various factors lead to discordant findings.

Authors:  J H Yoon; M J Kim; E-K Kim; H J Moon; J S Choi
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 6.548

3.  Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; David O Cosgrove; Caroline J Doré; Fritz K W Schäfer; William E Svensson; Regina J Hooley; Ralf Ohlinger; Ellen B Mendelson; Catherine Balu-Maestro; Martina Locatelli; Christophe Tourasse; Barbara C Cavanaugh; Valérie Juhan; A Thomas Stavros; Anne Tardivon; Joel Gay; Jean-Pierre Henry; Claude Cohen-Bacrie
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Ultrasonographic tissue quantification of the breast using acoustic radiation force impulse technology: phantom study and clinical application.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Masahiro Saito; Chanwoong Joo; Miki Yamaguchi; Sachiko Isobe; Yukari Ogawa; Kanako Homma; Eisuke Fukuma
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Ultrasound elastography of breast lesions in chinese women: a multicenter study in China.

Authors:  Hui Zhi; Bing Ou; Xiao-yun Xiao; Yu-lan Peng; Yi Wang; Li-sha Liu; Ying Xiao; Shou-jun Liu; Chang-jun Wu; Yu-xin Jiang; Shyam Sundar Parajuly; Ping Xu; Yi Hao; Jing Li; Bao-Ming Luo
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Analysis of sonographic features for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors of different sizes.

Authors:  S-C Chen; Y-C Cheung; C-H Su; M-F Chen; T-L Hwang; S Hsueh
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.299

7.  Shear wave velocity measurements for differential diagnosis of solid breast masses: a comparison between virtual touch quantification and virtual touch IQ.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Masahiro Saito; John Benson; Liexiang Fan; Sachiko Isobe
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Ultrasound of the breast - value of sonographic criteria for the differential diagnosis of solid lesions.

Authors:  R Ohlinger; G M Klein; G Köhler
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.548

9.  Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging.

Authors:  Mickael Tanter; Jeremy Bercoff; Alexandra Athanasiou; Thomas Deffieux; Jean-Luc Gennisson; Gabriel Montaldo; Marie Muller; Anne Tardivon; Mathias Fink
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Diagnostic value of virtual touch tissue quantification for breast lesions with different size.

Authors:  Minghua Yao; Jian Wu; Liling Zou; Guang Xu; Juan Xie; Rong Wu; Huixiong Xu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  4 in total

1.  The value of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions.

Authors:  Wen-Tao Kong; Wei-Jun Zhou; Yin Wang; Xiao-Min Zhuang; Min Wu
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  Qualitative and quantitative analysis with a novel shear wave speed imaging for differential diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  Yu-Ping Yang; Xiao-Hong Xu; Le-Hang Guo; Ya-Ping He; Dan Wang; Bo-Ji Liu; Chong-Ke Zhao; Bao-Ding Chen; Hui-Xiong Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Near field effect on elasticity measurement for cartilage-bone structure using Lamb wave method.

Authors:  Hao Xu; Shigao Chen; Kai-Nan An; Zong-Ping Luo
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.819

4.  Assessment of early damage of endometrium after artificial abortion by shear wave elastography.

Authors:  Yan Jiao; Nianyu Xue; Chunpeng Zou; Xujuan Shui; Hongqing Wang; Chunhong Hu
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-03-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.