Literature DB >> 9680580

Effects of a microbubble contrast agent on breast tumors: computer-assisted quantitative assessment with color Doppler US--early experience.

S Huber1, T Helbich, J Kettenbach, W Dock, I Zuna, S Delorme.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate objectively the effects of a microbubble contrast agent on the color Doppler ultrasound (US) examination of breast lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients aged 23-71 years underwent color Doppler US before and after intravenous injection of a microbubble contrast agent. A 3-minute computer-assisted assessment of the color pixel density (CPD) was used to evaluate objectively the increase in the number of color Doppler US signals, the transit time of the microbubble bolus, and the potential additional differential diagnostic information.
RESULTS: Peak CPD at contrast agent-enhanced color Doppler US was 14.3% +/- 8.1 (mean +/- 1 standard deviation) for carcinomas and 9.3% +/- 4.9 for benign lesions (P = .04). The time to peak enhancement was shorter in carcinomas (38 seconds +/- 20) than in benign tumors (71 seconds +/- 48, P = .02). Final CPD was close or equal to baseline values. With the median of 13% for peak CPD as a threshold, the sensitivity for this parameter was 55%, the specificity was 79%, and the accuracy was 62% (P = .04). For a median time to peak of 50 seconds, the sensitivity was 84%, the specificity was 57%, and the accuracy was 76%.
CONCLUSION: After microbubble contrast agent injection, carcinomas and benign lesions behave differently in degree, onset, and duration of Doppler US enhancement. High interindividual variability and temporal variations in the Doppler US signal still limit the value of these criteria for prospective diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9680580     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.208.2.9680580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Imaging of molecular structures of breasts with new sonography techniques].

Authors:  M Reisegger; G Schueller; R Gruber; K Pinker; C Riedl; T H Helbich
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  [Ultrasound contrast agents: substance classes, pharmacokinetics, clinical applications, safety aspects].

Authors:  C Krestan
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  A review of breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Chandra M Sehgal; Susan P Weinstein; Peter H Arger; Emily F Conant
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

4.  Breast Sonography - 2D, 3D, 4D Ultrasound or Elastography?

Authors:  Christian Weismann; Christian Mayr; Heike Egger; Alena Auer
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 5.  [Quantitative methods in sonography].

Authors:  K-V Jenderka; S Delorme
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  [Breast cancer. Sonography and magnetic resonance mammography].

Authors:  S Delorme
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Delta-projection imaging on contrast-enhanced ultrasound to quantify tumor microvasculature and perfusion.

Authors:  Chandra M Sehgal; Theodore W Cary; Peter H Arger; Andrew K W Wood
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 8.  Ultrasound of prostate cancer: recent advances.

Authors:  Leo Pallwein; Michael Mitterberger; Alexandre Pelzer; Georg Bartsch; Hannes Strasser; Germar M Pinggera; Friedrich Aigner; Johann Gradl; Dieter Zur Nedden; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the characterisation of breast masses: utility of quantitative analysis in comparison with MRI.

Authors:  Natalia Caproni; Francesca Marchisio; Annarita Pecchi; Barbara Canossi; Rachele Battista; Piero D'Alimonte; Pietro Torricelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Monitoring therapeutic efficacy in breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Anne A Tardivon; Liliane Ollivier; Carl El Khoury; Fabienne Thibault
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 7.034

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.