Literature DB >> 21669352

Spatial resolution limits of multislice computed tomography (MS-CT), C-arm-CT, and flat panel-CT (FP-CT) compared to MicroCT for visualization of a small metallic stent.

Mircea Ionescu1, Ralph W Metcalfe, Dianna Cody, Miguel Valdivia Y Alvarado, John Hipp, Goetz Benndorf.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Small metallic stents are increasingly used in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms and for revascularization in ischemic strokes. Realistic three-dimensional datasets of a stent were obtained by using three x-ray-based imaging methods in current clinical use. Multislice-CT (MS-CT), C-arm flat detector-CT (C-arm CT, ACT), and flat panel-CT (FP-CT) were compared with high-resolution laboratory MicroCT scans that served as a reference standard. The purpose was to assess and compare the quality and accuracy of current clinical three-dimensional reconstructions of a vascular stents. MATERIAL &
METHODS: A 3 × 20 mm Cypher stent was deployed in a straight polytetrafluoroethylene tube and filled with nondiluted iodine contrast and BaSO(4). MS-CT images of the static tube phantom and stent were acquired using GE LightSpeed VCT Series, C-arm CT images were obtained using Artis (DynaCT, Siemens), FP-CT were obtained using a preclinical research CT (GE), and MicroCT images were obtained using eXplore Locus SP (GE). DICOM datasets were analyzed using Amira and Matlab.
RESULTS: Because of blooming effects, the maximum intensity projections (MIPs) and volume renderings generated from MS-CT showed significantly increased strut dimensions with no distinction between the regular struts and connector struts while the lumen diameter is artificially reduced. The shape of the reconstructed stent surface differed remarkably from the real stent. C-arm CT and FP-CT volume renderings more accurately represented the struts. Consistently capturing the structure of the connectors and the strut shape definition was highly threshold dependent. The stent lumen was about 30% underestimated by MS-CT when compared to MicroCT.
CONCLUSION: The spatial resolution of current clinical CT for imaging of small metallic stents is insufficient to visualize fine geometrical details. Further improvement in the spatial resolution of clinical imaging technologies combined with better software and hardware for image postprocessing will be necessary for detailed structural analysis, evaluation of the stent lumen in vivo, and to permit accurate assessment of stent patency and early detection potential in-stent stenosis.
Copyright © 2011 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21669352     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  13 in total

1.  Dose reduction in cone-beam CT scanning for intracranial stent deployment before coil embolization of intracranial wide-neck aneurysms.

Authors:  Takumi Kuriyama; Nobuyuki Sakai; Norimitsu Niida; Masaki Sueoka; Mikiya Beppu; Chihebeddine Dahmani; Iwao Kojima; Chiaki Sakai; Hirotoshi Imamura; Katsuhiro Masago; Nobuyuki Katakami
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Novel preclinical method for evaluating the efficacy of a percutaneous treatment in human ex vivo calcified plaque.

Authors:  Robert S Chisena; Jordan Sengenberger; Albert J Shih; Hitinder Gurm
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Angiographic CT: in vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents-does stent orientation matter?

Authors:  Michael Lettau; Martin Bendszus; Stefan Hähnel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Comparison of high-resolution X-ray and micro-CT for experimental evaluation of intracranial stent prototypes: quality evaluation beyond CE mark.

Authors:  Andreas Keuler; Christian Taschner; Marc Alexander Brockmann; Hanne Boll; Katharina Förster; Lisa Lutz; Annegret Herrmann-Frank; Monika Lelgemann; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Angiographic CT with intravenous contrast agent application for monitoring of intracranial flow diverting stents.

Authors:  Marc Saake; Tobias Struffert; Philipp Goelitz; Sabine Ott; Frank Seifert; Oliver Ganslandt; Arnd Doerfler
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Flat-detector computed tomography evaluation in an experimental animal aneurysm model after endovascular treatment: A pilot study.

Authors:  Sabine Ott; Philipp Gölitz; Edyta Adamek; Kevin Royalty; Arnd Doerfler; Tobias Struffert
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 1.610

7.  Can C-arm cone-beam CT detect a micro-embolic effect after TheraSphere radioembolization of neuroendocrine and carcinoid liver metastasis?

Authors:  Olivier Pellerin; MingDe Lin; Nikhil Bhagat; Wenbo Shao; Jean-François Geschwind
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.099

8.  Evaluation of occurring complications after flow diverter treatment of elastase-induced aneurysm in rabbits using micro-CT and MRI at 9.4 T.

Authors:  Andreas Simgen; Désirée Ley; Christian Roth; Giorgio Franco Maria Cattaneo; Ruben Mühl-Benninghaus; Andreas Müller; Heiko Körner; Yoo-Jin Kim; Bruno Scheller; Wolfgang Reith; Umut Yilmaz
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Effect of structural remodeling (retraction and recoil) of the pipeline embolization device on aneurysm occlusion rate.

Authors:  L-D Jou; B D Mitchell; H M Shaltoni; M E Mawad
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  C-arm CT for histomorphometric evaluation of lumbar spine trabecular microarchitecture: a study on anorexia nervosa patients.

Authors:  C M Phan; O Khalilzadeh; J Dinkel; I S Wang; M A Bredella; M Misra; K K Miller; A Klibanski; R Gupta
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.