Literature DB >> 21665357

The surgical learning curve for artificial urinary sphincter procedures compared to typical surgeon experience.

Jaspreet S Sandhu1, Alexandra C Maschino, Andrew J Vickers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is a well-established treatment for male stress urinary incontinence.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize the surgical learning curve for reoperation rates after AUS implantation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study cohort consisted of 65 602 adult males who received an AUS between 1988 and 2008, constituting close to 90% of all operations conducted during that time. Data on reoperations were obtained from the manufacturer, which requires documentation for warranty coverage. MEASUREMENTS: Surgeon experience was calculated as the number of original AUS implants performed prior to the index patient's surgery. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between experience and reoperative rates, adjusted for case mix. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: There was a slow but steady decrease in reoperative rates with increasing surgeon experience (p=0.020), showing no plateau through 200 procedures. The risk of reoperation for a surgeon with five prior cases was 24.0%, which decreased to 18.1% for a surgeon with 100 prior implants (absolute risk difference [ARD]: 5.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-10.1%) and to 13.2% for a surgeon with 200 prior implants (ARD: 10.7%; 95% CI, 2.6-16.6%). Two-thirds of contemporary patients (having AUS procedure between years 2000 and 2008) saw a surgeon who had done ≤25 prior AUS implants; only 9% saw a surgeon with ≥100 prior procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: The learning curve for AUS surgery appears to be very long and without an obvious plateau. This is in contrast to typical surgeon experience, suggesting a considerable burden of avoidable reoperations. Efforts to flatten the learning are urgently needed.
Copyright © 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21665357      PMCID: PMC3646622          DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  16 in total

1.  A national survey of urinary and health related quality of life outcomes in men with an artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence.

Authors:  Bruce L Dalkin; Hunter Wessells; Haiyan Cui
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  New surgical technique for sphincter urinary control system using upper transverse scrotal incision.

Authors:  Steven K Wilson; John R Delk; Gerard D Henry; Andrew L Siegel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Impact of the new cuff design on reliability of the AS800 artificial urinary sphincter.

Authors:  J K Light; J C Reynolds
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Experience with the artificial urinary sphincter model AS800 in 148 patients.

Authors:  I J Fishman; R Shabsigh; F B Scott
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Success of the narrow-backed cuff design of the AMS800 artificial urinary sphincter: analysis of 144 patients.

Authors:  M E Leo; D M Barrett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy.

Authors:  Michael L Guralnick; Elizabeth Miller; Khai Lee Toh; George D Webster
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Mayo Clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: a review of 323 cases.

Authors:  D S Elliott; D M Barrett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  13 years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine.

Authors:  H Henry Lai; Elias I Hsu; Bin S Teh; E Brian Butler; Timothy B Boone
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Current use of artificial urinary sphincters in the United States.

Authors:  W Stuart Reynolds; Riddhi Patel; Lambda Msezane; Alvaro Lucioni; David E Rapp; Gregory T Bales
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter.

Authors:  Ganesh V Raj; Andrew C Peterson; Khai Lee Toh; George D Webster
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  16 in total

1.  [Management of urinary incontinence after orthotopic urinary diversion].

Authors:  A Soave; R Dahlem; M Rink; S Ahyai; M Fisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Risk factors for artificial urinary sphincter failure.

Authors:  Alexander Kretschmer; Alexander Buchner; Markus Grabbert; Christian G Stief; Micaela Pavlicek; Ricarda M Bauer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Surgical practice patterns for male urinary incontinence: analysis of case logs from certifying American urologists.

Authors:  Stephen A Poon; Jonathan L Silberstein; Caroline Savage; Alexandra C Maschino; William T Lowrance; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Management of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Thomas R Jarvis; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Efficacy and safety of the ZSI375 artificial urinary sphincter for male stress urinary incontinence: lessons learned.

Authors:  Alexander Kretschmer; Tanja Hüsch; Frauke Thomsen; Dominik Kronlachner; Tobias Pottek; Alice Obaje; Ralf Anding; Achim Rose; Roberto Olianas; Alexander Friedl; Wilhelm Hübner; Roland Homberg; Jesco Pfitzenmaier; Ulrich Grein; Fabian Queissert; Carsten M Naumann; Josef Schweiger; Carola Wotzka; Joanne N Nyarangi-Dix; Torben Hofmann; Alexander Buchner; Axel Haferkamp; Ricarda M Bauer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Incontinence: what is the learning curve for artificial urinary sphincter surgery?

Authors:  H Henry Lai
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  Reconstructive Management Options of Delayed Complications Following Bladder Outlet Surgery.

Authors:  Nora Baker; Carmen Tong; Jay Simhan
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  [Incontinence after radical prostatectomy : Male Sling or "best option" first?]

Authors:  J F Gerhard; M S Aragona; R Olianas
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  Preceding the procedure: medical devices and shared decision making.

Authors:  Julian J Prokopetz; Jeffrey N Katz; Elena Losina; Thomas S Thornhill; John Wright; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.794

10.  Dorsolateral fibromuscular tissue preservation during artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement is associated with low infection and erosion rates.

Authors:  Felix Cheung; Ali Fathollahi; Emily Vertosick; Thomas R Jarvis; Darren Katz; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.