Literature DB >> 2913350

Experience with the artificial urinary sphincter model AS800 in 148 patients.

I J Fishman1, R Shabsigh, F B Scott.   

Abstract

The latest version of the artificial urinary sphincter, AS800, was used in 148 patients with urinary incontinence of different etiologies. Followup ranged from 3 to 37 months, with an average of 20.8 months. There were 112 (76 per cent) male and 36 (24 per cent) female patients. The cuff was implanted around the bladder neck in 78 patients (53 per cent) and around the bulbar urethra in 70 (47 per cent). Socially acceptable urinary control was achieved in 90 per cent of the 139 patients with active devices in place. It was necessary to remove the sphincter in 11 patients (7.4 per cent). The reasons for removal were infection and erosion in 8 patients (5.4 per cent), infection without erosion in 2 (1.3 per cent), and erosion due to excess pressure and poor tissues in 1 (0.7 per cent). Comparison of success and failure rates associated with incontinence of different etiologies revealed that patients with incontinence after failure of a conventional antistress incontinence operation and those with incontinence after transurethral resection or radical prostactectomy had the highest success rate, and that patients with incontinence secondary to pelvic fracture or exstrophy and epispadias had the highest failure rates. The deactivation feature (the lock) of the new artificial sphincter model was beneficial for primary deactivation, urethral catheterization or cystoscopy, or for elective nocturnal decompression of the bladder neck or urethral tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2913350     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40748-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

1.  The artificial urinary sphincter is the treatment of choice for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence.

Authors:  Sender Herschorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Use of the artificial urinary sphincter in men and women.

Authors:  B C Leibovich; D M Barrett
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  The surgical learning curve for artificial urinary sphincter procedures compared to typical surgeon experience.

Authors:  Jaspreet S Sandhu; Alexandra C Maschino; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  [Artificial sphincter for the treatment of incontinence].

Authors:  N Djakovic; J Huber; J Nyarangi-Dix; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  A comparison of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter between cases with and without an underlying neurogenic aetiology.

Authors:  S Murphy; D Rea; J O'Mahony; T E D McDermott; J Thornhill; M Butler; R Grainger
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 6.  Incontinence after radical prostatectomy: pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  S A MacDiarmid
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Functional Outcomes and Long-term Durability of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Application: Review of 56 Patients With Long-term Follow-up.

Authors:  Omer Gülpınar; Evren Süer; Mehmet İlker Gökce; Ahmet Hakan Haliloğlu; Erdem Oztürk; Nihat Arıkan
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-06-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.