Literature DB >> 9507835

Mayo Clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: a review of 323 cases.

D S Elliott1, D M Barrett.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determine the long-term durability of the AMS 800* artificial urinary sphincter in the correction of severe urinary incontinence, and evaluate mechanical versus nonmechanical failure and reoperation rates before (1983 to 1987) and after (1988 to present) the introduction of the narrow backing occlusive cuff design.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1983 to October 1994 more than 400 patients received an AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter placed by 1 surgeon and 323, mean age 60.4 years, met study requirements for review. Mean followup was 68.8 months (range 18 to 153). Only patients with a minimum of 18 months of followup were included in the study. Of the 313 men and 10 women in the study group sphincters were placed at the urethra in 272 and at the bladder neck in 51. All patients were followed from surgery to the date of sphincter failure. Etiology of the failures was recorded and divided into mechanical versus nonmechanical sphincters placed before and after the introduction of the narrow backing cuff.
RESULTS: Overall, 58 of the 139 patients (42%) in the pre-narrow backing cuff group versus 31 of the 184 (17%) in the narrow backing cuff group required a first reoperation. Mechanical failure occurred in 29 cases (21%) with the pre-narrow backing and 14 (7.6%) with the narrow backing cuff. Nonmechanical failure developed in 24 cases (17%) with the pre-narrow backing and 17 (9%) with the narrow backing cuff. Ultimately 437 operations were required in the 323 patients, of whom 234 (72%) required no further surgical intervention at a mean followup of 68.8 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Technological advances in the design and construction of the AMS 800 have dramatically decreased the reoperation and failure rates. These advances and improved surgical techniques provide an excellent long-term solution and increased continence in correctly selected patients with urinary incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9507835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  49 in total

Review 1.  Regular review: management of urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  R Thakar; S Stanton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-25

2.  Risk factors for artificial urinary sphincter failure.

Authors:  Alexander Kretschmer; Alexander Buchner; Markus Grabbert; Christian G Stief; Micaela Pavlicek; Ricarda M Bauer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Surgical practice patterns for male urinary incontinence: analysis of case logs from certifying American urologists.

Authors:  Stephen A Poon; Jonathan L Silberstein; Caroline Savage; Alexandra C Maschino; William T Lowrance; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Assessment and therapy for voiding dysfunction after prostatectomy.

Authors:  Rodney A Appell
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Suburethral slings for postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Kevin V Carlson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  The artificial urinary sphincter is the treatment of choice for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence.

Authors:  Sender Herschorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  The artificial urinary sphincter in the female: indications for use, surgical approach and results.

Authors:  D S Elliott; D M Barrett
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1998

8.  Incontinence: what is the learning curve for artificial urinary sphincter surgery?

Authors:  H Henry Lai
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Long-term results of the implantation of the AMS 800 artificial sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Carlos Alberto Ricetto Sacomani; Stênio de Cássio Zequi; Walter Henriques da Costa; Bruno Santos Benigno; Rodrigo Sousa Madeira Campos; Wilson Bachega; Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

10.  Male incontinence: Pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  Ajay K Singla
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.