Literature DB >> 29972627

Dorsolateral fibromuscular tissue preservation during artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement is associated with low infection and erosion rates.

Felix Cheung1, Ali Fathollahi2, Emily Vertosick1, Thomas R Jarvis3, Darren Katz4, Jaspreet S Sandhu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To present a modified technique in artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement that is associated with low rates of erosion and infection in a high-risk population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, we identified patients who underwent primary AUS placement using the modified technique between January 2007 and November 2015. Our modification consists of preserving the dorsolateral fibromuscular tissue surrounding the bulbar urethra and horizontally transecting the ventral bulbospongiosus muscle during urethral cuff placement. Preoperative variables such as radiotherapy (RT) and bladder neck contractures were recorded. Effectiveness and complications including infections, erosions, and re-operations were recorded at follow-up.
RESULTS: The new technique was used on 208 patients: 40% had a history of RT, including 15% who had had a salvage radical prostatectomy; 26% had had previous bladder neck contractures. No patients developed infection. Overall, erosion occurred in six (2.9%) patients and spontaneous erosions occurred in two (0.9%) during the study period. In all, 21 patients underwent re-operation for device failure. The probability of re-operation for 'any' reason was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4-12%) at 1 year. The 1-year social continence rate was 74% (95% CI 67-81%).
CONCLUSION: Preservation of dorsolateral fibromuscular tissue during AUS placement is an effective means to achieve a low risk of erosions. Our modified technique is safe with low infection and erosion rates, whilst maintaining good functional outcomes despite a high-risk population.
© 2018 The Authors BJU International © 2018 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial urinary sphincter; erosion; infection; prostatectomy; stress incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29972627      PMCID: PMC8672706          DOI: 10.1111/bju.14476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  23 in total

Review 1.  Cancer control and functional outcomes of salvage radical prostatectomy for radiation-recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Daher C Chade; James Eastham; Markus Graefen; Jim C Hu; R Jeffrey Karnes; Laurence Klotz; Francesco Montorsi; Hendrik van Poppel; Peter T Scardino; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Long-term device outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter reimplantation following prior explantation for erosion or infection.

Authors:  Brian J Linder; Mitra de Cogain; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Prospective follow-up study of artificial urinary sphincter placement preserving the bulbospongiosus muscle.

Authors:  Argimiro Collado Serra; José Domínguez-Escrig; Álvaro Gómez-Ferrer; Emilio Batista Miranda; José Rubio-Briones; Eduardo Solsona Narbón
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 4.  Success of the narrow-backed cuff design of the AMS800 artificial urinary sphincter: analysis of 144 patients.

Authors:  M E Leo; D M Barrett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Two-stage management of severe postprostatectomy bladder neck contracture associated with stress incontinence.

Authors:  Angelo E Gousse; Hari S G R Tunuguntla; Line Leboeuf
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 6.  Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a review.

Authors:  Mary H James; Kurt A McCammon
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 3.369

Review 7.  The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence.

Authors:  Frank Van der Aa; Marcus J Drake; George R Kasyan; Andreas Petrolekas; Jean-Nicolas Cornu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Artificial Urinary Sphincter: Report of the 2015 Consensus Conference.

Authors:  X Biardeau; S Aharony; L Campeau; J Corcos
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.696

9.  Immediate urethral repair during explantation prevents stricture formation after artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion.

Authors:  Alexander T Rozanski; Timothy J Tausch; Daniel Ramirez; Jay Simhan; J Francis Scott; Allen F Morey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation in the irradiated patient.

Authors:  Niranjan J Sathianathen; Sean M McGuigan; Daniel A Moon
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.