Literature DB >> 29170788

[Incontinence after radical prostatectomy : Male Sling or "best option" first?]

J F Gerhard1, M S Aragona2, R Olianas1.   

Abstract

Postprostatectomy incontinence (PPI) is a rare complication of radical prostatectomy, and it may lead to severe limitations for the patient and loss of quality of life. Several different surgical options for the therapy of PPI are available and may be chosen depending on severity of incontinence, residual urethral sphincter function, and previous history of radiotherapy. Alternatives to artificial urinary sphincters which over the last few decades have represented the gold standard for treatment of PPI are fixed slings and adjustable devices. In cases of mild or moderate incontinence, male slings can be used. Adjustable devices can also be adopted in irradiated patient with good results. Artificial urinary sphincters represent the ideal option in case of severe incontinence. Absolute contraindications for the implant of this device are impaired dexterity and cognitive capacity of the patients that may make use of the pump difficult. One type of therapy for all patients does not exist and must be individually determined. It is influenced by the grade of incontinence, the anatomical conditions, and the patient's expectations. Thus, appropriate counselling is mandatory. A common opinion is that these devices are direct competitors in the treatment of PPI. In reality, these devices are completely different surgical methods that rely on different principles and therefore have different indications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostics of incontinence; Male Sling; Postprostatectomy incontinence; Therapy of incontinence; Urinary sphincter, artificial

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29170788     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-017-0535-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  60 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Raymond C Rosen; Walter Artibani; Peter R Carroll; Anthony Costello; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Vipul R Patel; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Henk Van der Poel; Timothy G Wilson; Filiberto Zattoni; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Urinary artificial sphincter ZSI 375 for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men: 5 and 7 years follow-up report.

Authors:  Christophe Llorens; Tobias Pottek
Journal:  Urologia       Date:  2017-05-18

3.  Long-term efficacy of the bone-anchored male sling for moderate and severe stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Maude Carmel; Bechir Hage; Samer Hanna; Gerard Schmutz; Le Mai Tu
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  The Artificial Urinary Sphincter is Superior to a Secondary Transobturator Male Sling in Cases of a Primary Sling Failure.

Authors:  Divya Ajay; Haijing Zhang; Shubham Gupta; John P Selph; Michael J Belsante; Aaron C Lentz; George D Webster; Andrew C Peterson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Mid-term results for the retroluminar transobturator sling suspension for stress urinary incontinence after prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ricarda M Bauer; Irina Soljanik; Claudius Füllhase; Alexander Karl; Armin Becker; Christian G Stief; Christian Gozzi
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Repeat retrourethral transobturator sling in the management of recurrent postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence after failed first male sling.

Authors:  Irina Soljanik; Armin J Becker; Christian G Stief; Christian Gozzi; Ricarda M Bauer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  An adjustable sling for the treatment of all degrees of male stress urinary incontinence: retrospective evaluation of efficacy and complications after a minimal followup of 14 months.

Authors:  Deirdre M Bochove-Overgaauw; Bart Ph Schrier
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  [Urinary incontinence in men].

Authors:  R M Bauer; M Oelke; W Hübner; M Grabbert; R Kirschner-Hermanns; R Anding
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results.

Authors:  A E Gousse; S Madjar; M M Lambert; I J Fishman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Bruce J Trock; Misop Han; Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Theodore L DeWeese; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.