Literature DB >> 21656317

Insufficient acetabular version increases blood metal ion levels after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Alister J Hart1, John A Skinner, Johann Henckel, Barry Sampson, Fabiana Gordon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many factors affect the blood metal ion levels after metal-on-metal (MOM) hip arthroplasty. The main surgically adjustable variable is the amount of coverage of the head provided by the cup which is a function of the inclination and version angles. However, most studies have used plain radiographs which have questionable precision and accuracy, particularly for version and large diameter metal heads; further, these studies do not simultaneously assess version and inclination. Thus the relationship between version and blood metal ions levels has not been resolved. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined whether cup inclination and version influence blood metal ion levels while adjusting for age at assessment, gender, body mass index, horizontal femoral offset, head size, manufacturer hip type, and Oxford hip score. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively followed 100 individuals (51 females, 49 males) with unilateral MOM hip resurfacing who underwent clinical assessment, CT scanning, and blood metal ion measurement. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine which variables were predictors of blood metal ion levels and to model the effect of these variables.
RESULTS: Only cup inclination, version angles, and gender influenced blood cobalt or chromium levels. Cobalt and chromium levels positively correlated with inclination angle and negatively correlated with version angle. The effect of changes in version angle was less than for inclination angle. Based on our observations, we developed a formula to predict the effect of these parameters on metal ion levels.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest insufficient cup version can cause high blood metal ions after MOM hip arthroplasty. We were unable to show that excessive version caused high levels. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21656317      PMCID: PMC3148360          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1930-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  37 in total

1.  A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints: Part II: design.

Authors:  Duncan Dowson; Cath Hardaker; Magnus Flett; Graham H Isaac
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Position of the acetabular cup -- accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement.

Authors:  Thomas Kalteis; Martin Handel; Thomas Herold; Lars Perlick; Christian Paetzel; Joachim Grifka
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  How do serum cobalt and chromium levels change after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Diane L Back; D A Young; A J Shimmin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Serum aluminium and cobalt levels after ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-metal total hip replacement.

Authors:  A Grübl; M Weissinger; W Brodner; A Gleiss; A Giurea; M Gruber; G Pöll; V Meisinger; F Gottsauner-Wolf; R Kotz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-08

Review 5.  Statistics in orthopaedic papers.

Authors:  A Petrie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-09

6.  Blood and urine metal ion levels in young and active patients after Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: four-year results of a prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  J Daniel; H Ziaee; C Pradhan; P B Pynsent; D J W McMinn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-02

7.  Metal-on-metal hip simulator study of increased wear particle surface area due to 'severe' patient activity.

Authors:  J G Bowsher; A Hussain; P A Williams; J C Shelton
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.617

8.  Metal ion levels after metal-on-metal proximal femoral replacements: a 30-year follow-up.

Authors:  E Dunstan; A P Sanghrajka; S Tilley; P Unwin; G Blunn; S R Cannon; T W R Briggs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-05

9.  Very low-dose computed tomography for planning and outcome measurement in knee replacement. The imperial knee protocol.

Authors:  J Henckel; R Richards; K Lozhkin; S Harris; F M Rodriguez y Baena; A R W Barrett; J P Cobb
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-11

10.  Metal release in patients who have had a primary total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, controlled, longitudinal study.

Authors:  J J Jacobs; A K Skipor; L M Patterson; N J Hallab; W G Paprosky; J Black; J O Galante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  29 in total

1.  Management of failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Justin W Griffin; Michele D'Apuzzo; James A Browne
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-06-18

2.  Comparison between component designs with different femoral head size in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty; multicenter randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Wataru Ando; Kengo Yamamoto; Takashi Atsumi; Satoshi Tamaoki; Kazuhiro Oinuma; Hideaki Shiratsuchi; Hirohiko Tokunaga; Yutaka Inaba; Naomi Kobayashi; Masaharu Aihara; Kenji Ohzono
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-06-10

3.  The sagittal stem alignment and the stem version clearly influence the impingement-free range of motion in total hip arthroplasty: a computer model-based analysis.

Authors:  Michael Müller; Georg Duda; Carsten Perka; Stephan Tohtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Asymptomatic prospective and retrospective cohorts with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty indicate acquired lymphocyte reactivity varies with metal ion levels on a group basis.

Authors:  Nadim J Hallab; Marco Caicedo; Kyron McAllister; Anastasia Skipor; Harlan Amstutz; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Accuracy of the modified Hardinge approach in acetabular positioning.

Authors:  Prateek Goyal; Adrian Lau; Richard McCalden; Matthew G Teeter; James L Howard; Brent A Lanting
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Blood metal ion concentrations in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tadahiko Ohtsuru; Yuji Morita; Yasuaki Murata; Shuji Shimamoto; Yutaro Munakata; Yoshiharu Kato
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-02-20

7.  The First SICOT Oral Presentation Award 2011: imageless computer-assisted femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Maik Stiehler; Jens Goronzy; Albrecht Hartmann; Frank Krummenauer; Klaus-Peter Günther
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Management of metal-on-metal hip implant patients: Who, when and how to revise?

Authors:  Reshid Berber; John A Skinner; Alister J Hart
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-05-18

Review 9.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an analysis of safety and revision rates.

Authors:  S Sehatzadeh; K Kaulback; L Levin
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2012-08-01

10.  What are the predictors and prevalence of pseudotumor and elevated metal ions after large-diameter metal-on-metal THA?

Authors:  Nick Bayley; Habeeb Khan; Paul Grosso; Thomas Hupel; David Stevens; Matthew Snider; Emil Schemitsch; Paul Kuzyk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.