Literature DB >> 22720266

Management of failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Justin W Griffin1, Michele D'Apuzzo, James A Browne.   

Abstract

The theoretical advantages of metal-on-metal (MOM) bearing couples in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been recently balanced by concerns regarding adverse local and systemic effects. Higher than anticipated early revision rates have been reported by several joint registries. Failed MOM hips present with a spectrum of symptoms and findings and traditional methods of failure must be considered in addition to the failure modes that appear to be unique to the MOM bearing couple. Metal hypersensitivity and soft tissue immune reactions remain incompletely understood and require careful ongoing study. The tools available to evaluate MOM THAs and the indications for revision surgery remain to be defined. Outcomes following revision of MOM hips appear to depend on appropriate evaluation, early identification, and appropriate surgical management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aseptic lymphocytic-vasculitis-associated lesions; Hip arthroplasty; Metal hypersensitivity; Metal-on-metal; Pseudotumor; Revision joint arthroplasty

Year:  2012        PMID: 22720266      PMCID: PMC3377908          DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v3.i6.70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Orthop        ISSN: 2218-5836


  25 in total

1.  Clinical experience of revision of metal on metal hip arthroplasty for aseptic lymphocyte dominated vasculitis associated lesions (ALVAL).

Authors:  Asim Rajpura; Martyn L Porter; Anil K Gambhir; Anthony J Freemont; Timothy N Board
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  "Asymptomatic" pseudotumors after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: prevalence and metal ion study.

Authors:  Young-Min Kwon; Simon J Ostlere; Peter McLardy-Smith; Nicholas A Athanasou; Harinderjit S Gill; David W Murray
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Early osteolysis following second-generation metal-on-metal hip replacement.

Authors:  Youn-Soo Park; Young-Wan Moon; Seung-Jae Lim; Jun-Mo Yang; Geunghwan Ahn; Yoon-La Choi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear.

Authors:  D J Langton; T J Joyce; S S Jameson; J Lord; M Van Orsouw; J P Holland; A V F Nargol; K A De Smet
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-02

5.  Metal-on-metal: history, state of the art (2010).

Authors:  Philippe Triclot
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a spectrum of clinical presentations and operative findings.

Authors:  James A Browne; C Dustin Bechtold; Daniel J Berry; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Analysis of 118 second-generation metal-on-metal retrieved hip implants.

Authors:  H P Sieber; C B Rieker; P Köttig
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-01

8.  Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: what do they tell us? What do they not tell us?

Authors:  Kristoff Corten; Steven J MacDonald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Metal-on-metal bearing surfaces.

Authors:  Joshua J Jacobs; Robert M Urban; Nadim J Hallab; Anastasia K Skipor; Alfons Fischer; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: does early clinical outcome justify the chance of an adverse local tissue reaction?

Authors:  Charles A Engh; Henry Ho; Charles A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  4 in total

1.  Revisions of monoblock metal-on-metal THAs have high early complication rates.

Authors:  Louis S Stryker; Susan M Odum; Thomas K Fehring; Bryan D Springer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Intravenous infusion of magnesium sulphate during subarachnoid anaesthesia in hip surgery and its effect on postoperative analgesia: our experience.

Authors:  A Pastore; M Lanna; N Lombardo; C Policastro; C Iacovazzo
Journal:  Transl Med UniSa       Date:  2013-01-04

3.  Revision of Metal-on-metal Hip Arthroplasty with Well Fixed and Positioned Acetabular Component Using a Dual-mobility Head and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Guillem Figueras; Ramón Vives Planell; Ramón Serra Fernàndez; Joan Camí Biayna
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-10-31

4.  Surgical Treatment of Intrapelvic Pseudotumour after Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Cristian Barrientos; Julian Brañes; José-Luis Llanos; Alvaro Martinez; Maximiliano Barahona
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2018-10-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.