Literature DB >> 16297856

The relationship between phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taster status and taste thresholds for sucrose and quinine.

Won-Ic Chang1, Jin-Woo Chung, Young-Ku Kim, Sung-Chang Chung, Hong-Seop Kho.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of taster status with taste detection and recognition thresholds for sucrose and quinine.
DESIGN: Sixty-nine subjects (35 men and 34 women; mean age, 23.9+/-1.2 years) were included. Stimulus fluids were prepared, one each for phenylthiocarbamide (PTC), 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP), sucrose and quinine HCl. In each series, successive solutions, which comprised a total of 15 grades, differed by 0.25log units of the molar concentration. Two concentrations of NaCl (0.32 and 1.0 M) were prepared. The subjects were classified as nontasters and tasters using their PTC and PROP perceptions. Tasters were classified as medium-tasters and supertasters by the ratio of perceived bitterness of above-threshold PROP relative to the perceived saltiness of NaCl (PROP ratio). Taste detection and recognition thresholds for sucrose and quinine were determined by standard two-alternative forced choice trials. A Student's t-test, a Pearson's correlation analysis and linear contrasts in a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used.
RESULTS: The percentages of nontaster, medium-taster and supertaster were 13, 70 and 17%, respectively. There were no significant gender differences in the taste detection and recognition thresholds for sucrose and quinine. The threshold for PTC and PROP showed significant correlations with taste threshold for quinine. Linear contrast in one-way ANOVA showed that the greater the value of PROP ratio, the more sensitive to sweet and bitter tastes (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: The PTC and PROP taster status is closely related with taste detection and recognition thresholds for sucrose and quinine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16297856     DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2005.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Oral Biol        ISSN: 0003-9969            Impact factor:   2.633


  19 in total

1.  Preference for sucralose predicts behavioral responses to sweet and bittersweet tastants.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ann-Marie Torregrossa; Chris Carballo; Lisa A Eckel
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Effects of cigarette smoking and family history of alcoholism on sweet taste perception and food cravings in women.

Authors:  Marta Yanina Pepino; Julie A Mennella
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Rats display a robust bimodal preference profile for sucralose.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ann-Marie Torregrossa; James C Smith; Anthony Sclafani; Lisa A Eckel
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Validation of edible taste strips for identifying PROP taste recognition thresholds.

Authors:  Hetvi Desai; Gregory Smutzer; Susan E Coldwell; James W Griffith
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Association between common variation in genes encoding sweet taste signaling components and human sucrose perception.

Authors:  Alexey A Fushan; Christopher T Simons; Jay P Slack; Dennis Drayna
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Examination of the perception of sweet- and bitter-like taste qualities in sucralose preferring and avoiding rats.

Authors:  A-M Torregrossa; G C Loney; J C Smith; L A Eckel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-10

7.  Taste masking by spray-drying technique.

Authors:  Divyakumar Bora; Priyanka Borude; Kiran Bhise
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 3.246

8.  Response to bitter substances in primates: roles of diet tendency and weaning age.

Authors:  Shelly Masi; Nawal Asselain; Laurent Robelin; Aude Bourgeois; Christelle Hano; Gerard Dousseau; Michel Saint Jalme; Sabrina Krief
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.526

9.  Development and Evaluation of Taste Masked Granular Formulation of Satranidazole by Melt Granulation Technique.

Authors:  Harshal Ashok Pawar; Pooja Rasiklal Joshi
Journal:  J Pharm (Cairo)       Date:  2014-02-12

10.  No Difference in Perceived Intensity of Linoleic Acid in the Oral Cavity between Obese and Nonobese Individuals.

Authors:  Robin M Tucker; Tiffany M Nuessle; Nicole L Garneau; Gregory Smutzer; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.