Literature DB >> 21614505

A comparison of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis to measure total and segmental body composition in healthy young adults.

Siobhan Leahy1, Cian O'Neill, Rhoda Sohun, Philip Jakeman.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of BIA in the measurement of total body composition and regional fat and the fat free mass in the healthy young adults. Four hundred and three healthy young adults (167 women and 236 men) aged 18-29 years were recruited from the Mid-West region of Ireland. Multi frequency, eight-polar bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were used to measure the total body and segmental (arm, leg and trunk) fat mass and the fat free mass. BIA was found to underestimate the percentage total body fat in men and women (p < 0.001). This underestimate increased in men with >24.6% body fat and women with >32% body fat (p < 0.001). Fat tissue mass in the trunk segment was overestimated by 2.1 kg (p < 0.001) in men and underestimated by 0.4 kg (p < 0.001) in women. BIA was also found to underestimate the fat free mass in the appendages by 1.0 kg (p < 0.001) in men and 0.9 kg (p < 0.001) in women. Compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance analysis underestimates the total body fat mass and overestimates fat free mass in healthy young adults. BIA should, therefore, be used with caution in the measurement of total body composition in women and men with >25% total body fat. Though statistically significant, the small difference (~ 4%) between the methods indicates that the BIA may be used interchangeably with DXA in the measurement of appendicular fat free mass in healthy young adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21614505     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-2010-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  20 in total

Review 1.  Bioelectrical impedance analysis--part I: review of principles and methods.

Authors:  Ursula G Kyle; Ingvar Bosaeus; Antonio D De Lorenzo; Paul Deurenberg; Marinos Elia; José Manuel Gómez; Berit Lilienthal Heitmann; Luisa Kent-Smith; Jean-Claude Melchior; Matthias Pirlich; Hermann Scharfetter; Annemie M W J Schols; Claude Pichard
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.324

2.  Within-day variability of whole-body and segmental bioelectrical impedance in a standing position.

Authors:  Y Oshima; T Shiga
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 3.  Human body composition: in vivo methods.

Authors:  K J Ellis
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Use of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in body-composition studies: not yet a "gold standard".

Authors:  R Roubenoff; J J Kehayias; B Dawson-Hughes; S B Heymsfield
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  The influence of a breakfast meal on the assessment of body composition using bioelectrical impedance.

Authors:  M Gallagher; K Z Walker; K O'Dea
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Cross-validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in a representative sample of 6- to 13-year-old children.

Authors:  S Kriemler; J Puder; L Zahner; R Roth; C Braun-Fahrländer; G Bedogni
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  New bioimpedance analysis system: improved phenotyping with whole-body analysis.

Authors:  A Pietrobelli; F Rubiano; M-P St-Onge; S B Heymsfield
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Factors affecting bioelectrical impedance measurements in humans.

Authors:  P Deurenberg; J A Weststrate; I Paymans; K van der Kooy
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  iDXA, Prodigy, and DPXL dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry whole-body scans: a cross-calibration study.

Authors:  Holly Hull; Qing He; John Thornton; Fahad Javed; Lynn Allen; Jack Wang; Richard N Pierson; Dympna Gallagher
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 2.617

View more
  34 in total

1.  Comparison of Multi-Frequency Bioelectrical Impedance and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry to Assess Body Composition in College-Aged Adults.

Authors:  Rachel N Tauber; Clayton L Camic; Shuqi Zhang; Peter J Chomentowski
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-12-01

2.  How Length Sizes Affect Body Composition Estimation in Adolescent Athletes Using Bioelectrical Impedance.

Authors:  Katinka Utczás; Zsófia Tróznai; Gergely Pálinkás; Irina Kalabiska; Leonidas Petridis
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Body composition changes by DXA, BIA and skinfolds during exercise training in women.

Authors:  Elina Sillanpää; Arja Häkkinen; Keijo Häkkinen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Associations of overnight changes in body composition with positional obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Nguyen Thanh Tung; Shang-Yang Lin; Hoang Ba Dung; Tran Phan Chung Thuy; Yi-Chun Kuan; Cheng-Yu Tsai; Chen-Chen Lo; Kang Lo; Wen-Te Liu; Hsiao-Chi Chuang
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Reliability of Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis to Quantify Body Composition in Patients After Musculoskeletal Trauma.

Authors:  Brandon Koch; Aspen Miller; Natalie A Glass; Erin Owen; Tessa Kirkpatrick; Ruth Grossman; Steven M Leary; John Davison; Michael C Willey
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2022-06

6.  Assessment of clinical measures of total and regional body composition from a commercial 3-dimensional optical body scanner.

Authors:  Jonathan P Bennett; Yong En Liu; Brandon K Quon; Nisa N Kelly; Michael C Wong; Samantha F Kennedy; Dominic C Chow; Andrea K Garber; Ethan J Weiss; Steven B Heymsfield; John A Shepherd
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 7.643

7.  Body composition in overweight and obese women postpartum: bioimpedance methods validated by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and doubly labeled water.

Authors:  L Ellegård; F Bertz; A Winkvist; I Bosaeus; H K Brekke
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  The body composition phenotype of Irish adults aged 18-81 years.

Authors:  C Toomey; S Leahy; K McCreesh; S Coote; P Jakeman
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  Comparison of body composition assessment across body mass index categories by two multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis devices and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in clinical settings.

Authors:  Yair Lahav; Nir Goldstein; Yftach Gepner
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.884

10.  Body fat equations and electrical bioimpedance values in prediction of cardiovascular risk factors in eutrophic and overweight adolescents.

Authors:  Franciane Rocha Faria; Eliane Rodrigues Faria; Roberta Stofeles Cecon; Djalma Adão Barbosa Júnior; Sylvia do Carmo Castro Franceschini; Maria do Carmo Gouveia Peluzio; Andréia Queiroz Ribeiro; Pedro Israel Cabral Lira; Paulo Roberto Cecon; Silvia Eloiza Priore
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.257

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.