Background: Changes in body composition, especially loss of lean mass, commonly occur in the orthopedic trauma population due to physical inactivity and inadequate nutrition. The purpose of this study was to assess inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of a portable bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) device to measure body composition in an orthopedic trauma population after operative fracture fixation. BIA uses a weak electric current to measure impedance (resistance) in the body and uses this to calculate the components of body composition using extensively studied formulas. Methods: Twenty subjects were enrolled, up to 72 hours after operative fixation of musculoskeletal injuries and underwent body composition measurements by two independent raters. One measurement was obtained by each rater at the time of enrollment and again between 1-4 hours after the initial measurement. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and minimum detectable change (MDC) values were calculated from these results. Results: Inter-rater reliability was excellent with ICC values for body fat mass (BFM), lean body mass (LBM), skeletal muscle mass (SMM), dry lean mass (DLM), and percent body fat (PBF) of 0.993, 0.984, 0.984, 0.979, and 0.986 respectively. Intra-rater reliability was also high for BFM, LBM, SMM, DLM, and PBF, at 0.994, 0.989, 0.990, 0.983, 0.987 (rater 1) and 0.994, 0.988, 0.989, 0.985, 0.989 (rater 2). MDC values were calculated to be 4.05 kg for BFM, 4.10 kg for LBM, 2.45 kg for SMM, 1.21 kg for DLM, and 4.83% for PBF. Conclusion: Portable BIA devices are a versatile and attractive option that can reliably be used to assess body composition and changes in lean body mass in the orthopedic trauma population for both research and clinical endeavors. Level of Evidence: III.
Background: Changes in body composition, especially loss of lean mass, commonly occur in the orthopedic trauma population due to physical inactivity and inadequate nutrition. The purpose of this study was to assess inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of a portable bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) device to measure body composition in an orthopedic trauma population after operative fracture fixation. BIA uses a weak electric current to measure impedance (resistance) in the body and uses this to calculate the components of body composition using extensively studied formulas. Methods: Twenty subjects were enrolled, up to 72 hours after operative fixation of musculoskeletal injuries and underwent body composition measurements by two independent raters. One measurement was obtained by each rater at the time of enrollment and again between 1-4 hours after the initial measurement. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and minimum detectable change (MDC) values were calculated from these results. Results: Inter-rater reliability was excellent with ICC values for body fat mass (BFM), lean body mass (LBM), skeletal muscle mass (SMM), dry lean mass (DLM), and percent body fat (PBF) of 0.993, 0.984, 0.984, 0.979, and 0.986 respectively. Intra-rater reliability was also high for BFM, LBM, SMM, DLM, and PBF, at 0.994, 0.989, 0.990, 0.983, 0.987 (rater 1) and 0.994, 0.988, 0.989, 0.985, 0.989 (rater 2). MDC values were calculated to be 4.05 kg for BFM, 4.10 kg for LBM, 2.45 kg for SMM, 1.21 kg for DLM, and 4.83% for PBF. Conclusion: Portable BIA devices are a versatile and attractive option that can reliably be used to assess body composition and changes in lean body mass in the orthopedic trauma population for both research and clinical endeavors. Level of Evidence: III.
Authors: Kerri L Vasold; Andrew C Parks; Deanna M L Phelan; Matthew B Pontifex; James M Pivarnik Journal: Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Grant M Tinsley; M Lane Moore; Zad Rafi; Nelson Griffiths; Patrick S Harty; Matthew T Stratton; Marqui L Benavides; Jacob R Dellinger; Brian T Adamson Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Matthew M Schubert; Rebekah F Seay; Katie K Spain; Holly E Clarke; James K Taylor Journal: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 2.273