Literature DB >> 33414874

Comparison of Multi-Frequency Bioelectrical Impedance and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry to Assess Body Composition in College-Aged Adults.

Rachel N Tauber1, Clayton L Camic1, Shuqi Zhang2, Peter J Chomentowski1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of whole body percent fat (%BF) and segmental fat-free mass (FFM) using multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MF-BIA) and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in college-aged adults. Sixty-two participants male (n = 32) and female (n = 30) completed MF-BIA and DEXA measurements following established pre-test guidelines. %BF and segmental FFM (right arm, left arm, trunk, right leg, and left leg) were collected and analyzed. The MF-BIA significantly (p < 0.05) underestimated %BF for all participants, females, and males compared to DEXA. In addition, MF-BIA significantly (p < 0.05) underestimated FFM in the arms and legs in all participants and males with the exception of the left arm in all subjects while significantly overestimating FFM in the trunk. In females, the MF-BIA overestimated FFM in the arms and trunk while significantly (p < 0.05) underestimating FFM in the legs. Difference plots also indicated that the underestimation of FFM from MF-BIA in the arms and legs increased as the amount of FFM increased. Thus, our findings suggested that the MF-BIA may not be accurate for measuring whole %BF and segmental FFM in the college-aged population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  females; males; percent body fat; segmental fat-free mass

Year:  2020        PMID: 33414874      PMCID: PMC7745892     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci        ISSN: 1939-795X


  20 in total

1.  A comparison of body composition techniques.

Authors:  F Rubiano; C Nuñez; S B Heymsfield
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Why Bland-Altman plots should use X, not (Y+X)/2 when X is a reference method.

Authors:  Jan S Krouwer
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Comparison of total and segmental body composition using DXA and multifrequency bioimpedance in collegiate female athletes.

Authors:  Michael R Esco; Ronald L Snarr; Matthew D Leatherwood; Nik A Chamberlain; Melvenia L Redding; Andrew A Flatt; Jordan R Moon; Henry N Williford
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Appendicular Body Composition Analysis: Validity of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Compared With Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Division I College Athletes.

Authors:  Gabrielle J Brewer; Malia N M Blue; Katie R Hirsch; Austin M Peterjohn; Abbie E Smith-Ryan
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Human body composition: in vivo methods.

Authors:  K J Ellis
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 37.312

6.  A comparison of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis to measure total and segmental body composition in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Siobhan Leahy; Cian O'Neill; Rhoda Sohun; Philip Jakeman
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Comparison of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of percentage body fat in a large, healthy population.

Authors:  Guang Sun; Curtis R French; Glynn R Martin; Ban Younghusband; Roger C Green; Ya-Gang Xie; Maria Mathews; Jane R Barron; Donald G Fitzpatrick; Wayne Gulliver; Hongwei Zhang
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Utility of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance compared with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for assessment of total and regional body composition varies between men and women.

Authors:  Lindsey J Anderson; David N Erceg; E Todd Schroeder
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Validity of segmental multiple-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate body composition of adults across a range of body mass indexes.

Authors:  Kimberly J Shafer; William A Siders; LuAnn K Johnson; Henry C Lukaski
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 4.008

Review 10.  Clinical usefulness of bioimpedance analysis for assessing volume status in patients receiving maintenance dialysis.

Authors:  Jung Hwan Park; Young-Il Jo; Jong-Ho Lee
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.