Literature DB >> 21588729

Quinoline-2-carbonitrile.

Wan-Sin Loh1, Ching Kheng Quah, Madhukar Hemamalini, Hoong-Kun Fun.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(10)H(6)N(2), the mol-ecule is almost planar, with an r.m.s. deviation of 0.014 Å. The dihedral angle between the aromatic rings is 1.28 (16)°. In the crystal, mol-ecules are stacked along the a axis by way of weak aromatic π-π stacking inter-actions between the benzene and pyridine rings of adjacent mol-ecules [centroid-centroid separation = 3.7943 (19) Å].

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21588729      PMCID: PMC3008022          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810033118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the biological activity and syntheses of quinoline derivatives, see: Sasaki et al. (1998 ▶); Reux et al. (2009 ▶). For related structures, see: Fun et al. (2010 ▶); Loh et al. (2009 ▶, 2010 ▶). For the stability of the temperature controller used in the data collection, see: Cosier & Glazer (1986 ▶). For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C10H6N2 M = 154.17 Orthorhombic, a = 3.8497 (2) Å b = 9.9559 (4) Å c = 19.9639 (13) Å V = 765.16 (7) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.08 mm−1 T = 100 K 0.36 × 0.18 × 0.03 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEXII CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009 ▶) T min = 0.971, T max = 0.997 4086 measured reflections 1056 independent reflections 838 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.059

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.056 wR(F 2) = 0.141 S = 1.09 1056 reflections 109 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.31 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.24 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810033118/hb5597sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810033118/hb5597Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H6N2F(000) = 320
Mr = 154.17Dx = 1.338 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 930 reflections
a = 3.8497 (2) Åθ = 3.7–27.4°
b = 9.9559 (4) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
c = 19.9639 (13) ÅT = 100 K
V = 765.16 (7) Å3Plate, colourless
Z = 40.36 × 0.18 × 0.03 mm
Bruker SMART APEXII CCD diffractometer1056 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube838 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.059
φ and ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009)h = −4→4
Tmin = 0.971, Tmax = 0.997k = −12→12
4086 measured reflectionsl = −25→21
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.056Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.141H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.09w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0827P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1056 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
109 parametersΔρmax = 0.31 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.24 e Å3
Experimental. The crystal was placed in the cold stream of an Oxford Cryosystems Cobra open-flow nitrogen cryostat (Cosier & Glazer, 1986) operating at 100.0 (1) K.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.7386 (8)0.5083 (2)0.20498 (14)0.0185 (6)
N20.3930 (9)0.4374 (2)0.35822 (16)0.0296 (7)
C10.7983 (9)0.2683 (3)0.22614 (16)0.0193 (7)
H1A0.75520.19640.25470.023*
C20.9617 (9)0.2502 (3)0.16647 (16)0.0192 (7)
H2A1.03680.16490.15410.023*
C31.0178 (9)0.3604 (3)0.12314 (16)0.0174 (7)
C41.1815 (8)0.3487 (3)0.06064 (16)0.0201 (7)
H4A1.26620.26580.04680.024*
C51.2177 (9)0.4589 (3)0.01965 (18)0.0224 (7)
H5A1.32040.4498−0.02230.027*
C61.0989 (8)0.5855 (3)0.04129 (17)0.0239 (8)
H6A1.12570.65950.01330.029*
C70.9466 (9)0.6018 (3)0.10188 (17)0.0213 (7)
H7A0.87360.68660.11540.026*
C80.8981 (8)0.4894 (3)0.14492 (17)0.0162 (7)
C90.6962 (8)0.4002 (3)0.24322 (16)0.0169 (7)
C100.5263 (9)0.4229 (3)0.30714 (17)0.0196 (7)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0149 (13)0.0120 (10)0.0284 (15)−0.0014 (10)−0.0013 (13)−0.0012 (10)
N20.0336 (17)0.0199 (13)0.0353 (17)0.0000 (12)0.0055 (16)−0.0013 (13)
C10.0146 (16)0.0128 (12)0.0306 (18)0.0016 (12)−0.0030 (15)0.0009 (12)
C20.0155 (16)0.0113 (12)0.0307 (18)0.0009 (12)−0.0020 (15)−0.0027 (12)
C30.0130 (15)0.0150 (13)0.0243 (17)0.0006 (11)−0.0063 (14)−0.0028 (12)
C40.0134 (16)0.0184 (14)0.0286 (19)0.0016 (12)−0.0010 (15)−0.0060 (13)
C50.0164 (16)0.0251 (15)0.0256 (17)−0.0004 (14)−0.0003 (15)−0.0006 (13)
C60.0218 (17)0.0167 (13)0.0333 (19)−0.0009 (13)−0.0003 (16)0.0053 (14)
C70.0202 (17)0.0128 (13)0.0311 (19)−0.0003 (13)−0.0039 (16)0.0021 (12)
C80.0124 (15)0.0111 (12)0.0249 (16)−0.0016 (11)−0.0027 (14)−0.0033 (12)
C90.0130 (14)0.0130 (12)0.0247 (17)−0.0019 (12)−0.0035 (14)−0.0018 (11)
C100.0186 (17)0.0098 (12)0.0306 (19)−0.0019 (12)−0.0015 (15)0.0008 (12)
N1—C91.329 (4)C4—C51.376 (4)
N1—C81.360 (4)C4—H4A0.9300
N2—C101.151 (4)C5—C61.409 (4)
C1—C21.359 (4)C5—H5A0.9300
C1—C91.413 (4)C6—C71.354 (4)
C1—H1A0.9300C6—H6A0.9300
C2—C31.414 (4)C7—C81.424 (4)
C2—H2A0.9300C7—H7A0.9300
C3—C41.402 (4)C9—C101.452 (4)
C3—C81.432 (4)
C9—N1—C8116.7 (2)C6—C5—H5A120.1
C2—C1—C9117.6 (3)C7—C6—C5121.5 (3)
C2—C1—H1A121.2C7—C6—H6A119.3
C9—C1—H1A121.2C5—C6—H6A119.3
C1—C2—C3120.3 (3)C6—C7—C8120.1 (3)
C1—C2—H2A119.9C6—C7—H7A120.0
C3—C2—H2A119.9C8—C7—H7A120.0
C4—C3—C2123.3 (2)N1—C8—C7118.8 (2)
C4—C3—C8119.3 (3)N1—C8—C3122.5 (3)
C2—C3—C8117.4 (3)C7—C8—C3118.7 (3)
C5—C4—C3120.6 (3)N1—C9—C1125.4 (3)
C5—C4—H4A119.7N1—C9—C10115.7 (2)
C3—C4—H4A119.7C1—C9—C10118.8 (3)
C4—C5—C6119.9 (3)N2—C10—C9178.2 (3)
C4—C5—H5A120.1
C9—C1—C2—C3−1.4 (4)C6—C7—C8—N1−178.8 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4−179.4 (3)C6—C7—C8—C30.9 (5)
C1—C2—C3—C80.3 (4)C4—C3—C8—N1−179.7 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C5177.7 (3)C2—C3—C8—N10.6 (4)
C8—C3—C4—C5−2.0 (4)C4—C3—C8—C70.6 (4)
C3—C4—C5—C61.9 (5)C2—C3—C8—C7−179.1 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C7−0.4 (5)C8—N1—C9—C1−1.0 (5)
C5—C6—C7—C8−1.0 (5)C8—N1—C9—C10179.8 (3)
C9—N1—C8—C7179.4 (3)C2—C1—C9—N11.8 (5)
C9—N1—C8—C3−0.3 (4)C2—C1—C9—C10−179.0 (3)
  6 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  3-Acetyl-6-chloro-2-methyl-4-phenyl-quinolinium hydrogen sulfate.

Authors:  Wan-Sin Loh; Hoong-Kun Fun; S Sarveswari; V Vijayakumar; B Palakshi Reddy
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-11-21

3.  Quinoxaline-2-carbonitrile.

Authors:  Hoong-Kun Fun; Ching Kheng Quah; Annada C Maity; Nirmal Kumar Das; Shyamaprosad Goswami
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-12-04

4.  Synthesis of quinolinyl and isoquinolinyl phenyl ketones as novel agonists for the cannabinoid CB2 receptor.

Authors:  Bastien Reux; Tapio Nevalainen; Katri H Raitio; Ari M P Koskinen
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  1-(2-Methyl-6-nitro-4-phenyl-3-quinol-yl)ethanone.

Authors:  Wan-Sin Loh; Hoong-Kun Fun; K Kiran; S Sarveswari; V Vijayakumar
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-04-30

6.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  4-Meth-oxy-quinolinium-2-carboxyl-ate dihydrate.

Authors:  Madhukar Hemamalini; Hoong-Kun Fun
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-01-22

2.  8-Hy-droxy-quinolin-1-ium nitrate.

Authors:  Wan-Sin Loh; Madhukar Hemamalini; Hoong-Kun Fun
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-10-23

3.  2-Cyano-quinolin-1-ium hydrogen sulfate.

Authors:  Wan-Sin Loh; Madhukar Hemamalini; Hoong-Kun Fun
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-10-02

4.  2-Cyano-quinolin-1-ium nitrate.

Authors:  Wan-Sin Loh; Madhukar Hemamalini; Hoong-Kun Fun
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-10-09

5.  Quinoline-2-carbonitrile-fumaric acid (1/0.5).

Authors:  Wan-Sin Loh; Ching Kheng Quah; Madhukar Hemamalini; Hoong-Kun Fun
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-08-21

6.  8-Hy-droxy-5,7-dimethyl-quinolin-1-ium hydrogen sulfate.

Authors:  Kaliyaperumal Thanigaimani; Nuridayanti Che Khalib; Suhana Arshad; Ibrahim Abdul Razak
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-12-08

7.  8-Hy-droxy-quinolin-1-ium hydrogen sulfate monohydrate.

Authors:  Maamar Damous; George Dénès; Sofiane Bouacida; Meriem Hamlaoui; Hocine Merazig; Jean-Claude Daran
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-08-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.