Literature DB >> 21589082

8-Hy-droxy-quinolin-1-ium nitrate.

Wan-Sin Loh1, Madhukar Hemamalini, Hoong-Kun Fun.   

Abstract

In the title salt, C(9)H(8)NO(+)·NO(3) (-), the quinoline ring system is essentially planar with a maximum deviation of 0.043 (1) Å. In the crystal, an R(2) (2)(7) ring motif is formed by inter-molecular N-H⋯O and C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds between the cation and the anion. In addition, inter-molecular O-H⋯O and C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the two ions, generating an R(2) (2)(8) ring motif. These sets of ring motifs are further linked into a ribbon along the a axis via inter-molecular C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21589082      PMCID: PMC3009201          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810039395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background to and the biological activity of quinoline derivatives, see: Campbell et al. (1988 ▶); Markees et al. (1970 ▶); Michael (1997 ▶); Morimoto et al. (1991 ▶); Reux et al. (2009 ▶); Sasaki et al. (1998 ▶). For related structures, see: Loh et al. (2010a ▶,b ▶,c ▶,d ▶). For the stability of the temperature controller used in the data collection, see: Cosier & Glazer (1986 ▶). For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C9H8NONO3 M = 208.17 Monoclinic, a = 11.3186 (2) Å b = 6.7568 (1) Å c = 14.5006 (2) Å β = 128.882 (1)° V = 863.27 (2) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.13 mm−1 T = 100 K 0.33 × 0.21 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009 ▶) T min = 0.959, T max = 0.981 9590 measured reflections 1978 independent reflections 1754 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.023

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.033 wR(F 2) = 0.095 S = 1.08 1978 reflections 144 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.39 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.22 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810039395/is2609sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810039395/is2609Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C9H8NO+·NO3F(000) = 432
Mr = 208.17Dx = 1.602 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 5491 reflections
a = 11.3186 (2) Åθ = 3.5–37.4°
b = 6.7568 (1) ŵ = 0.13 mm1
c = 14.5006 (2) ÅT = 100 K
β = 128.882 (1)°Block, colourless
V = 863.27 (2) Å30.33 × 0.21 × 0.15 mm
Z = 4
Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer1978 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1754 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.023
φ and ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009)h = −14→14
Tmin = 0.959, Tmax = 0.981k = −8→8
9590 measured reflectionsl = −18→18
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.095H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.08w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0472P)2 + 0.3584P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1978 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
144 parametersΔρmax = 0.39 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.22 e Å3
Experimental. The crystal was placed in the cold stream of an Oxford Cryosystems Cobra open-flow nitrogen cryostat (Cosier & Glazer, 1986) operating at 100.0 (1) K.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.07908 (9)0.09986 (13)0.12784 (7)0.0167 (2)
N1−0.13600 (11)0.10475 (14)0.15595 (8)0.0139 (2)
C10.01506 (13)0.11333 (16)0.25398 (10)0.0138 (2)
C2−0.24612 (13)0.10646 (17)0.16438 (10)0.0163 (2)
H2A−0.34650.09530.09610.020*
C3−0.21344 (13)0.12476 (17)0.27446 (10)0.0171 (2)
H3A−0.29130.12790.27950.021*
C4−0.06498 (13)0.13802 (17)0.37464 (10)0.0158 (2)
H4A−0.04240.15460.44790.019*
C50.05450 (13)0.12672 (16)0.36803 (10)0.0144 (2)
C60.21000 (13)0.12812 (17)0.46913 (10)0.0171 (2)
H6A0.23830.13390.54470.020*
C70.31841 (13)0.12080 (18)0.45453 (10)0.0186 (3)
H7A0.42040.12090.52100.022*
C80.27878 (13)0.11312 (18)0.34078 (11)0.0177 (2)
H8A0.35470.11140.33340.021*
C90.12859 (13)0.10813 (16)0.24054 (10)0.0148 (2)
O20.52824 (10)0.47945 (18)0.24518 (8)0.0321 (3)
O30.53907 (10)0.42125 (15)0.39694 (8)0.0239 (2)
O40.74765 (9)0.44023 (13)0.41965 (7)0.0179 (2)
N20.60151 (11)0.44742 (16)0.35208 (9)0.0177 (2)
H1N1−0.1627 (19)0.091 (2)0.0852 (16)0.028 (4)*
H1O10.145 (2)0.056 (3)0.1211 (17)0.042 (5)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0159 (4)0.0230 (4)0.0140 (4)0.0024 (3)0.0108 (3)0.0012 (3)
N10.0159 (5)0.0145 (5)0.0124 (4)0.0001 (4)0.0095 (4)−0.0002 (3)
C10.0161 (5)0.0114 (5)0.0137 (5)0.0003 (4)0.0094 (4)0.0003 (4)
C20.0153 (5)0.0169 (5)0.0167 (5)−0.0007 (4)0.0100 (4)−0.0008 (4)
C30.0189 (5)0.0183 (6)0.0200 (5)−0.0007 (4)0.0150 (5)−0.0012 (4)
C40.0216 (6)0.0138 (5)0.0150 (5)0.0000 (4)0.0130 (5)−0.0003 (4)
C50.0183 (5)0.0114 (5)0.0146 (5)−0.0001 (4)0.0108 (5)0.0000 (4)
C60.0198 (5)0.0163 (5)0.0133 (5)0.0006 (4)0.0095 (5)−0.0004 (4)
C70.0152 (5)0.0191 (6)0.0160 (5)0.0010 (4)0.0071 (4)−0.0004 (4)
C80.0163 (5)0.0186 (6)0.0203 (6)0.0008 (4)0.0126 (5)0.0003 (4)
C90.0184 (5)0.0132 (5)0.0147 (5)0.0010 (4)0.0113 (5)0.0010 (4)
O20.0186 (4)0.0607 (7)0.0157 (4)0.0030 (4)0.0101 (4)0.0078 (4)
O30.0169 (4)0.0395 (5)0.0197 (4)−0.0012 (4)0.0137 (4)0.0007 (4)
O40.0121 (4)0.0260 (5)0.0155 (4)0.0000 (3)0.0087 (3)−0.0005 (3)
N20.0141 (4)0.0238 (5)0.0159 (5)0.0002 (4)0.0098 (4)−0.0006 (4)
O1—C91.3558 (13)C4—H4A0.9300
O1—H1O10.86 (2)C5—C61.4170 (15)
N1—C21.3266 (15)C6—C71.3707 (16)
N1—C11.3770 (14)C6—H6A0.9300
N1—H1N10.874 (18)C7—C81.4126 (16)
C1—C91.4160 (16)C7—H7A0.9300
C1—C51.4196 (15)C8—C91.3790 (16)
C2—C31.3995 (16)C8—H8A0.9300
C2—H2A0.9300O2—N21.2343 (13)
C3—C41.3701 (16)O3—N21.2372 (13)
C3—H3A0.9300O4—N21.2899 (12)
C4—C51.4166 (16)
C9—O1—H1O1114.7 (13)C4—C5—C1117.82 (10)
C2—N1—C1122.28 (10)C6—C5—C1118.93 (10)
C2—N1—H1N1117.2 (11)C7—C6—C5119.40 (10)
C1—N1—H1N1120.5 (11)C7—C6—H6A120.3
N1—C1—C9120.19 (10)C5—C6—H6A120.3
N1—C1—C5118.95 (10)C6—C7—C8121.52 (11)
C9—C1—C5120.86 (10)C6—C7—H7A119.2
N1—C2—C3120.99 (10)C8—C7—H7A119.2
N1—C2—H2A119.5C9—C8—C7120.63 (11)
C3—C2—H2A119.5C9—C8—H8A119.7
C4—C3—C2119.03 (10)C7—C8—H8A119.7
C4—C3—H3A120.5O1—C9—C8125.09 (10)
C2—C3—H3A120.5O1—C9—C1116.28 (10)
C3—C4—C5120.81 (10)C8—C9—C1118.62 (10)
C3—C4—H4A119.6O2—N2—O3122.01 (10)
C5—C4—H4A119.6O2—N2—O4119.39 (9)
C4—C5—C6123.24 (10)O3—N2—O4118.60 (9)
C2—N1—C1—C9179.06 (10)C4—C5—C6—C7−178.64 (11)
C2—N1—C1—C5−0.72 (16)C1—C5—C6—C71.38 (16)
C1—N1—C2—C32.44 (17)C5—C6—C7—C80.40 (18)
N1—C2—C3—C4−0.98 (17)C6—C7—C8—C9−1.52 (18)
C2—C3—C4—C5−2.14 (17)C7—C8—C9—O1−179.71 (11)
C3—C4—C5—C6−176.26 (11)C7—C8—C9—C10.77 (17)
C3—C4—C5—C13.72 (16)N1—C1—C9—O11.69 (15)
N1—C1—C5—C4−2.31 (15)C5—C1—C9—O1−178.53 (10)
C9—C1—C5—C4177.91 (10)N1—C1—C9—C8−178.75 (10)
N1—C1—C5—C6177.67 (10)C5—C1—C9—C81.03 (16)
C9—C1—C5—C6−2.11 (16)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N1···O4i0.874 (18)1.944 (18)2.8112 (12)171.6 (15)
O1—H1O1···O4ii0.86 (3)1.83 (3)2.6794 (16)169 (2)
C2—H2A···O3iii0.932.533.106 (2)120
C2—H2A···O3i0.932.313.0247 (14)133
C8—H8A···O2ii0.932.403.249 (2)152
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1N1⋯O4i0.874 (18)1.944 (18)2.8112 (12)171.6 (15)
O1—H1O1⋯O4ii0.86 (3)1.83 (3)2.6794 (16)169 (2)
C2—H2A⋯O3iii0.932.533.106 (2)120
C2—H2A⋯O3i0.932.313.0247 (14)133
C8—H8A⋯O2ii0.932.403.249 (2)152

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  9 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Antiprotozoal 4-aryloxy-2-aminoquinolines and related compounds.

Authors:  D G Markees; V C Dewey; G W Kidder
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Synthesis of quinolinyl and isoquinolinyl phenyl ketones as novel agonists for the cannabinoid CB2 receptor.

Authors:  Bastien Reux; Tapio Nevalainen; Katri H Raitio; Ari M P Koskinen
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  2,4-Diamino-6,7-dimethoxyquinoline derivatives as alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists and antihypertensive agents.

Authors:  S F Campbell; J D Hardstone; M J Palmer
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  2-Cyano-quinolin-1-ium hydrogen sulfate.

Authors:  Wan-Sin Loh; Madhukar Hemamalini; Hoong-Kun Fun
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-10-02

6.  2-Cyano-quinolin-1-ium nitrate.

Authors:  Wan-Sin Loh; Madhukar Hemamalini; Hoong-Kun Fun
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-10-09

7.  Quinoline-2-carbonitrile-fumaric acid (1/0.5).

Authors:  Wan-Sin Loh; Ching Kheng Quah; Madhukar Hemamalini; Hoong-Kun Fun
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-08-21

8.  Quinoline-2-carbonitrile.

Authors:  Wan-Sin Loh; Ching Kheng Quah; Madhukar Hemamalini; Hoong-Kun Fun
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-08-25

9.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.