Literature DB >> 21584705

[Treatment of peritrochanteric fractures: biomechanical considerations].

G Krischak1, L Dürselen, G Röderer.   

Abstract

Biomechanical considerations are relevant in the treatment of peritrochanteric fractures. Concomitant diseases and osteoporosis place high demands on the primary stability of the operative treatment. In the situation of unstable fractures (AO/ASIF 31-A2 and A3), even normal activities of life can easily exceed the critical limits of stability, which can result in implant failure. Both intramedullary and extramedullary implants are used successfully in the treatment of even unstable fractures. Different variations in the implant design and anchorage of the load carrier of the femoral neck are available and may have different biomechanical characteristics. Biomechanical tests show that new developments of implants can increase stability. Nevertheless, accurate reduction and operative technique is essential to ensure uneventful fracture healing. Although some supportive measures are very promising, such as augmentation, further research is required to increase stability in the unstable and osteoporotic fracture situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21584705     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-011-1976-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  25 in total

1.  Does cancellous bone compaction due to insertion of a blade implant influence the cut-out resistance? A biomechanical study.

Authors:  Dirk Wähnert; Paata Gudushauri; Damiano Schiuma; Geoff Richards; Markus Windolf
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Clinical comparison of the second and third generation of intramedullary devices for trochanteric fractures of the hip--Blade vs screw.

Authors:  Andreas Lenich; Helen Vester; Michael Nerlich; Edgar Mayr; Ulrich Stöckle; Bernd Füchtmeier
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities.

Authors:  G Bergmann; G Deuretzbacher; M Heller; F Graichen; A Rohlmann; J Strauss; G N Duda
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Intramedullary femoral nails: one or two lag screws? A preliminary study.

Authors:  C J Wang; C J Brown; A L Yettram; P Procter
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Predictive factors for cutting-out in femoral intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  Antonio Lobo-Escolar; Eduardo Joven; Daniel Iglesias; Antonio Herrera
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of a new augmentation method for enhanced screw fixation in osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  P von der Linden; A Gisep; V Boner; M Windolf; A Appelt; N Suhm
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: comparison of the proximal femoral nail antirotation and gamma nail 3.

Authors:  Yaozeng Xu; Dechun Geng; Huiling Yang; Xianbin Wang; Guangming Zhu
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 1.390

8.  Biomechanical characterisation of osteosyntheses for proximal femur fractures: helical blade versus screw.

Authors:  Amir A Al-Munajjed; Joachim Hammer; Edgar Mayr; Michael Nerlich; Andreas Lenich
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2008

9.  Is a helical shaped implant a superior alternative to the Dynamic Hip Screw for unstable femoral neck fractures? A biomechanical investigation.

Authors:  Markus Windolf; Volker Braunstein; Christof Dutoit; Karsten Schwieger
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 10.  Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.

Authors:  Martyn J Parker; Helen Hg Handoll
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-09-08
View more
  4 in total

1.  Screw-blade fixation systems in Pauwels three femoral neck fractures: a biomechanical evaluation.

Authors:  Matthias Knobe; Simon Altgassen; Klaus-Jürgen Maier; Gertraud Gradl-Dietsch; Chris Kaczmarek; Sven Nebelung; Kajetan Klos; Bong-Sung Kim; Boyko Gueorguiev; Klemens Horst; Benjamin Buecking
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-06       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparing the Intramedullary Nailing Method Versus Dynamic Hip Screw in Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Ali Yeganeh; Roozbeh Taghavi; Mehdi Moghtadaei
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2016-01-31

Review 3.  Anchorage strategies in geriatric hip fracture management.

Authors:  Matthias Knobe; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2016-12-22

4.  Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture with closed external fixation in high-risk geriatric patients: can it be the most reliable method that reduces mortality to minimum compared to proximal femoral nail and hemiarthroplasty?

Authors:  Akar Bedrettin; Fatih Sahin; Mucahid Osman Yucel
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.