Literature DB >> 18376008

Biomechanical characterisation of osteosyntheses for proximal femur fractures: helical blade versus screw.

Amir A Al-Munajjed1, Joachim Hammer, Edgar Mayr, Michael Nerlich, Andreas Lenich.   

Abstract

Proximal femur fractures are of main concern for elderly and especially osteoporotic patients. Despite advanced implant modifications and surgical techniques, serious mechanical complication rates between 4-18% are found in conventional osteosyntheses of proximal femur fractures. Clinical complications such as the rotation of the femoral head and the cut-out phenomenon of the fracture fixation bolt are often diagnosed during post-operative treatments. Therefore, efforts in new intramedulary techniques focus on the load bearing characteristics of the implant by developing new geometries to improve the implant-tissue interface. The objective of this investigation was to analyse the osteosynthesis/femur head interaction of two commonly used osteosyntheses, one with a helical blade and the other one with a screw design under different loading conditions. For the comparative investigation the helical blade of the Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation was investigated versus the screw system of the Dynamic Hip Screw. After implantation in a femoral head the loads for rotational overwinding of the implants were analysed. Pull-out forces with suppressed rotation were investigated with analysis of the influence of the previous overwinding. All investigations were performed on human femoral heads taken of patients with average age of 70.3+/-11.8. The bone mineral densities of the human specimens were detected by QCT-scans (average BMD: 338.9+/- 61.3$\frac[\mathit[mg]][\mathit[cm];[3]]$) Prior to cadaveric testing the experimental set-up was validated and special influences were analysed by the use of synthetic foam blocks (Sawbone). The helical blade showed a significant higher torque for the rotation of the femoral head compared to the screw system. The pull-out forces of the blade were substantially lower than of the comparative screw. Taken together the helical blade showed a higher potential of rotational stability, but after a rotation the lower pull-out forces demonstrate a higher degree of damage to the femoral head.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18376008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  18 in total

1.  Is the rotation of the femoral head a potential initiation for cutting out? A theoretical and experimental approach.

Authors:  Andreas Lenich; Samuel Bachmeier; Lukas Prantl; Michael Nerlich; Jochen Hammer; Edgar Mayr; Amir Andreas Al-Munajjed; Bernd Füchtmeier
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Comment on Stern et al.: Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Ramprasad Kancherla; Sukesh Sankineni; Vivek Trikha; Ramakant Kumar; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Richard Stern; Anne Lübbeke; Domizio Suva; Hermes Miozzari; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Intertrochanteric fractures: a review of fixation methods.

Authors:  Senthil Nathan Sambandam; Jayadev Chandrasekharan; Varatharaj Mounasamy; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-30

5.  [Stabilization of inter- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures with the PFNΑ®].

Authors:  O Büttner; S Styger; P Regazzoni; N Suhm
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 6.  [Treatment of peritrochanteric fractures: biomechanical considerations].

Authors:  G Krischak; L Dürselen; G Röderer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Comparison of Second and Third-Generation Nails in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture: Screws versus Helical Blades.

Authors:  Mert Kumbaraci; Levent Karapinar; Ali Turgut
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2017-02

8.  Traumatic subchondral fracture of the femoral head in a healed trochanteric fracture.

Authors:  Sang Yang Lee; Takahiro Niikura; Takashi Iwakura; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-07-11

9.  Intertrochanteric fractures: comparison between two different locking nails.

Authors:  Carmelo D'Arrigo; Alessandro Carcangiu; Dario Perugia; Simone Scapellato; Raffaella Alonzo; Silvia Frontini; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Outcome of the dynamic helical hip screw system for intertrochanteric hip fractures in the elderly patients.

Authors:  Natasha T O'Malley; Andrew-Paul Deeb; Karilee W Bingham; Stephen L Kates
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2012-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.