BACKGROUND: The Dynamic Hip Screw is well established for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. However, cut-out occurs in 1-6% of all cases. This study compared the biomechanical performance of a helical shaped implant (DHS-Blade) to the Dynamic Hip Screw in an unstable femoral neck fracture model. METHODS: Ten pairs of human cadaveric femora were either instrumented with a DHS-Blade or a Dynamic Hip Screw. Osteotomies were created using a custom-made saw-guide. Cyclic loading was performed by introducing in vivo measured load-trajectories to the femoral head. Starting at 1500 N, the load was stepwise increased until failure of the construct. Radiographs were taken in 5000 cycles increments to identify onset of femoral head migration with respect to the implant. A survival analysis was performed on the cycles to onset of migration. A paired t-test was carried out on the displacements of the femoral head relative to the shaft as determined by optical motion tracking. FINDINGS: One hundred percent migrations occurred for the Dynamic Hip Screw compared to 50% for the DHS-Blade. The survival probability in terms of implant anchorage was found higher for the blade (P=0.023). However, significant higher deformation of the repair construct was observed for the DHS-Blade (P=0.004). INTERPRETATION: The study showed superior implant anchorage of the DHS-Blade compared to the DHS, which might reduce the cut-out risk. Nevertheless, the blade allowed higher deformation of the femur mainly resulting in shortening of the neck, which might be due to a systematic loss of fracture reduction.
BACKGROUND: The Dynamic Hip Screw is well established for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. However, cut-out occurs in 1-6% of all cases. This study compared the biomechanical performance of a helical shaped implant (DHS-Blade) to the Dynamic Hip Screw in an unstable femoral neck fracture model. METHODS: Ten pairs of human cadaveric femora were either instrumented with a DHS-Blade or a Dynamic Hip Screw. Osteotomies were created using a custom-made saw-guide. Cyclic loading was performed by introducing in vivo measured load-trajectories to the femoral head. Starting at 1500 N, the load was stepwise increased until failure of the construct. Radiographs were taken in 5000 cycles increments to identify onset of femoral head migration with respect to the implant. A survival analysis was performed on the cycles to onset of migration. A paired t-test was carried out on the displacements of the femoral head relative to the shaft as determined by optical motion tracking. FINDINGS: One hundred percent migrations occurred for the Dynamic Hip Screw compared to 50% for the DHS-Blade. The survival probability in terms of implant anchorage was found higher for the blade (P=0.023). However, significant higher deformation of the repair construct was observed for the DHS-Blade (P=0.004). INTERPRETATION: The study showed superior implant anchorage of the DHS-Blade compared to the DHS, which might reduce the cut-out risk. Nevertheless, the blade allowed higher deformation of the femur mainly resulting in shortening of the neck, which might be due to a systematic loss of fracture reduction.
Authors: Andreas Lenich; Samuel Bachmeier; Lukas Prantl; Michael Nerlich; Jochen Hammer; Edgar Mayr; Amir Andreas Al-Munajjed; Bernd Füchtmeier Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2011-04-22 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Martin Rupprecht; Lars Grossterlinden; Kai Sellenschloh; Michael Hoffmann; Klaus Püschel; Michael Morlock; Johannes M Rueger; Wolfgang Lehmann Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: L Konstantinidis; C Papaioannou; P Blanke; A Hirschmüller; N P Südkamp; P Helwig Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: George K Kouvidis; Mark B Sommers; Peter V Giannoudis; Pavlos G Katonis; Michael Bottlang Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2009-05-18 Impact factor: 2.359