Literature DB >> 20832795

Predictive factors for cutting-out in femoral intramedullary nailing.

Antonio Lobo-Escolar1, Eduardo Joven, Daniel Iglesias, Antonio Herrera.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Femoral intramedullary nailing is currently one of the most frequent surgical treatments for extracapsular hip-fracture fixation. Cutting-out of the lag screw is the main complication of this technique, but only few studies have approached the cutting-out focussed on femoral nailing. The aim of this study was to confirm in patients treated with intramedullary nailing not only with regard to previous reports about the association of cutting-out with technical factors, but also with regard to clinical factors not previously studied.
METHODS: Case-control study of all patients sustaining a cut-out of the femoral nail was carried out and a control sample was randomly selected among all extracapsular hip-fracture patients during the study period (2005-2008). All clinical and technical variables were collected from medical records. Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) fracture classification, Singh Osteoporosis Index of the contralateral hip and the American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) criteria for preoperative clinical status were used. Statistical assessment included bivariant analysis and multivariant logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 916 hip-fracture cases were treated in the study period: 33 of them (3.6%) were identified as suffering cutting-out, and 315 controls fulfilling inclusion criteria were also recruited. No statistical differences were found in age, sex or other socio-demographic variables between the two groups. Bivariant analysis showed significant differences between groups in technical variables (tip-apex distance, suboptimal placement of lag screw, fracture diastasis, inadequate fixation quality and distal static locking) and in clinical variables (osteoporosis severity, right hip affected, better previous ability for walking and better preoperative ASA status). Multivariant logistic regression analysis showed significant association only for tip-apex distance and inadequate fixation quality. Differences in distal static locking were close to statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: The strongest predictor of cutting-out in femoral nailing is tip-apex distance. This study suggests that distal static locking and other clinical conditions play an important role in this fixation failure.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20832795     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  42 in total

1.  Cement augmentation of the proximal femur nail antirotation: is it safe?

Authors:  Konrad Schuetze; S Ehinger; A Eickhoff; C Dehner; F Gebhard; P H Richter
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Richard Stern; Anne Lübbeke; Domizio Suva; Hermes Miozzari; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Trochanteric fragility fractures : Treatment using the cement-augmented proximal femoral nail antirotation.

Authors:  C Neuerburg; S Mehaffey; M Gosch; W Böcker; M Blauth; C Kammerlander
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  Is helical blade superior to screw design in terms of cut-out rate for elderly trochanteric fractures? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiao Huang; Frankie Leung; Ming Liu; Long Chen; Zhao Xu; Zhou Xiang
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-02-21

Review 5.  Is rotation the mode of failure in pertrochanteric fractures fixed with nails? Theoretical approach and illustrative cases.

Authors:  C Kokoroghiannis; D Vasilakos; K Zisis; G Dimitriou; E Pappa; D Evangelopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-09-20

6.  Predictors of failure following fixation of intertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation.

Authors:  Raghavan Raghuraman; Jia Wen Kam; David Thai Chong Chua
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.858

7.  Can TAD and CalTAD predict cut-out after extra-medullary fixation with new generation devices of proximal femoral fractures? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Gaetano Caruso; Mattia Andreotti; Carlotta Pari; Francesco Soldati; Alessandro Gildone; Vincenzo Lorusso; Leo Massari
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-09-29

8.  Failure of short versus long cephalomedullary nail after intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Pernille Engell Bovbjerg; Morten Schultz Larsen; Carsten Fladmose Madsen; Jesper Schønnemann
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-11-06

9.  Tip apex distance, hip screw placement, and neck shaft angle as potential risk factors for cut-out failure of hip screws after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Hagen Andruszkow; Michael Frink; Cornelia Frömke; Amir Matityahu; Christian Zeckey; Philipp Mommsen; Stefanie Suntardjo; Christian Krettek; Frank Hildebrand
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Failure after osteosynthesis of trochanteric fractures. Where is the limit of osteoporosis?

Authors:  L Konstantinidis; C Papaioannou; P Blanke; A Hirschmüller; N P Südkamp; P Helwig
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.