Literature DB >> 21555653

Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population.

James S Goodwin1, Amanpal Singh, Nischita Reddy, Taylor S Riall, Yong-Fang Kuo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: All relevant authorities recommend an interval of 10 years between normal screening colonoscopies. We assessed the timing of repeated colonoscopies after a negative screening colonoscopy finding in a population-based sample of Medicare patients.
METHODS: A 5% national sample of Medicare enrollees from 2000 through 2008 was used to identify average-risk patients undergoing screening colonoscopy between 2001 and 2003. Colonoscopy was classified as a negative screening examination finding if no indication other than screening were in the claims and if no biopsy, fulguration, or polypectomy was performed. Time to repeated colonoscopy was calculated.
RESULTS: Among 24,071 Medicare patients who had a negative screening colonoscopy finding in 2001 through 2003, 46.2% underwent a repeated examination in fewer than 7 years. In 42.5% of these patients (23.5% of the overall sample), there was no clear indication for the early repeated examination. In patients aged 75 to 79 years or 80 years or older at the time of the initial negative screening colonoscopy result, 45.6% and 32.9%, respectively, received a repeated examination within 7 years. In multivariable analyses, male sex, more comorbidities, and colonoscopy by a high-volume colonoscopist or in an office setting were associated with higher rates of early repeated colonoscopy without clear indication, while those 80 years or older had a reduced risk. There were also marked geographic variations, from less than 5% in some health referral regions to greater than 50% in others.
CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of Medicare patients who undergo screening colonoscopy do so more frequently than recommended. Current Medicare regulations intending to limit reimbursement for screening colonoscopy to every 10 years would not appear to be effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21555653      PMCID: PMC3856662          DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  31 in total

1.  Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Debra J Holden; Daniel E Jonas; Deborah S Porterfield; Daniel Reuland; Russell Harris
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates.

Authors:  Brenda K Edwards; Elizabeth Ward; Betsy A Kohler; Christie Eheman; Ann G Zauber; Robert N Anderson; Ahmedin Jemal; Maria J Schymura; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Laura C Seeff; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; S Luuk Goede; Lynn A G Ries
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 50-75 years - United States, 2008.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 17.586

5.  Regional variations in diagnostic practices.

Authors:  Yunjie Song; Jonathan Skinner; Julie Bynum; Jason Sutherland; John E Wennberg; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Bernard Levin; David A Lieberman; Beth McFarland; Kimberly S Andrews; Durado Brooks; John Bond; Chiranjeev Dash; Francis M Giardiello; Seth Glick; David Johnson; C Daniel Johnson; Theodore R Levin; Perry J Pickhardt; Douglas K Rex; Robert A Smith; Alan Thorson; Sidney J Winawer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  The payoff time: a flexible framework to help clinicians decide when patients with comorbid disease are not likely to benefit from practice guidelines.

Authors:  R Scott Braithwaite; David Fiellin; Amy C Justice
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected].

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; David A Johnson; Joseph C Anderson; Phillip S Schoenfeld; Carol A Burke; John M Inadomi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Risk of perforation from a colonoscopy in adults: a large population-based study.

Authors:  Gaurav Arora; Ajitha Mannalithara; Gurkirpal Singh; Lauren B Gerson; George Triadafilopoulos
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Carrie N Klabunde; Angela B Mariotto; Angela Meekins; Marie Topor; Martin L Brown; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  98 in total

1.  Predictors of Poor Adherence of US Gastroenterologists with Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance Guidelines.

Authors:  Heba Iskandar; Yan Yan; Jill Elwing; Dayna Early; Graham A Colditz; Jean S Wang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Preventive health services delivery to South Asians in the United States.

Authors:  Nazleen Bharmal; Saima Chaudhry
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2012-10

3.  Vaccinations and preventive screening services for older adults: opportunities and challenges in the USA.

Authors:  Douglas Shenson; Lynda Anderson; Amy Slonim; William Benson
Journal:  Perspect Public Health       Date:  2012-07

Review 4.  Quality in Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Katherine T Brunner; Audrey H Calderwood
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-10

Review 5.  Race/Ethnicity and overuse of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy R Kressin; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 6.  Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy in Older Adults.

Authors:  Jennifer K Maratt; Audrey H Calderwood
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-06

7.  Physician perspectives on colorectal cancer surveillance care in a changing environment.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Katherine R Sterba; Nancy LaPelle; Kent Armeson; Dana R Burshell; Marvella E Ford
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2015-04-15

8.  Repeat colonoscopy after a colonoscopy with a negative result in Ontario: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lieke Hol; Rinku Sutradhar; Sumei Gu; Nancy N Baxter; Linda Rabeneck; Jill M Tinmouth; Lawrence F Paszat
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

9.  Use of the Shared Decision-Making Visit for Lung Cancer Screening Among Medicare Enrollees.

Authors:  James S Goodwin; Shawn Nishi; Jie Zhou; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen
Journal:  Tech Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.