Literature DB >> 30969399

Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy in Older Adults.

Jennifer K Maratt1,2, Audrey H Calderwood3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this chapter is to highlight current recommendations regarding colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy in older adults and to review the available literature in order to help inform decision-making in this age group. RECENT
FINDINGS: Age is a risk factor for CRC; however, older adults with a history of prior screening are at lower risk for CRC compared to those who have never been screened. Decision-making for CRC screening and post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy in older adults is complex and several factors including age, screening history, comorbidities, functional status, bowel preparation, prior experiences, preferences, and barriers need to be considered when weighing risks and benefits. Recent guidelines have started to incorporate life expectancy and prior screening history into their recommendations; however, how to incorporate these factors into actual clinical practice is less clear. There are limited data on the relative benefits of screening and surveillance in older adults and therefore, at this time, decision-making should be individualized and incorporate patient preferences in addition to medical factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon cancer; Elderly; Screening; Surveillance

Year:  2019        PMID: 30969399      PMCID: PMC6584566          DOI: 10.1007/s11938-019-00230-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1092-8472


  38 in total

1.  Colonoscopy in octogenarians: a prospective outpatient study.

Authors:  Frank J Lukens; David S Loeb; Victor I Machicao; Sami R Achem; Michael F Picco
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002).

Authors:  Stuart R Cairns; John H Scholefield; Robert J Steele; Malcolm G Dunlop; Huw J W Thomas; Gareth D Evans; Jayne A Eaden; Matthew D Rutter; Wendy P Atkin; Brian P Saunders; Anneke Lucassen; Paul Jenkins; Peter D Fairclough; Christopher R J Woodhouse
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Screening colonoscopy in very elderly patients: prevalence of neoplasia and estimated impact on life expectancy.

Authors:  Otto S Lin; Richard A Kozarek; Drew B Schembre; Kamran Ayub; Michael Gluck; Fred Drennan; Maw-Soan Soon; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Jennifer Holub; Glenn Eisen; Dale Kraemer; Cynthia D Morris
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Hypokalemia following polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation for colonoscopy in older hospitalized patients with significant comorbidities.

Authors:  Joanne Man-Wai Ho; David Nelson Juurlink; Rodrigo Brandao Cavalcanti
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  María Elena Martínez; John A Baron; David A Lieberman; Arthur Schatzkin; Elaine Lanza; Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber; Ruiyun Jiang; Dennis J Ahnen; John H Bond; Timothy R Church; Douglas J Robertson; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Elizabeth T Jacobs; David S Alberts; E Robert Greenberg
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 8.  Dosing considerations in the use of sodium phosphate bowel preparations for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Ann G Zauber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Amy B Knudsen; Janneke Wilschut; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; Floyd J Fowler; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  Colonoscopy utilization and outcomes in older adults: Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood; Tor D Tosteson; Louise C Walter; Peiying Hua; Tracy Onega
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Short- And medium-term outcomes of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with upper rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Huawen Wu; Zhijian Zheng; Lewei Xu; Yingying Wu; Ziyi Guan; Wenhuan Li; Guofu Chen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.452

3.  Colorectal cancer screening utilization among breast, cervical, prostate, skin, and lung cancer survivors.

Authors:  Meng-Han Tsai; Justin X Moore; Lorriane A Odhiambo; Sydney E Andrzejak; Martha S Tingen
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.062

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.