Literature DB >> 25752352

Race/Ethnicity and overuse of care: a systematic review.

Nancy R Kressin1, Peter W Groeneveld.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: POLICY POINTS: Racial/ethnic differences in the overuse of care (specifically, unneeded care that does not improve patients' outcomes) have received little scholarly attention. Our systematic review of the literature (59 studies) found that the overuse of care is not invariably associated with race/ethnicity, but when it was, a substantial proportion of studies found greater overuse of care among white patients. The absence of established subject terms in PubMed for the overuse of care or inappropriate care impedes the ability of researchers or policymakers to synthesize prior scientific or policy efforts. CONTEXT: The literature on disparities in health care has examined the contrast between white patients receiving needed care, compared with racial/ethnic minority patients not receiving needed care. Racial/ethnic differences in the overuse of care, that is, unneeded care that does not improve patients' outcomes, have received less attention. We systematically reviewed the literature regarding race/ethnicity and the overuse of care.
METHODS: We searched the Medline database for US studies that included at least 2 racial/ethnic groups and that examined the association between race/ethnicity and the overuse of procedures, diagnostic (care) or therapeutic care. In a recent review, we identified studies of overuse by race/ethnicity, and we also examined reference lists of retrieved articles. We then abstracted and evaluated this information, including the population studied, data source, sample size and assembly, type of care, guideline or appropriateness standard, controls for clinical confounding and financing of care, and findings.
FINDINGS: We identified 59 unique studies, of which 11 had a low risk of methodological bias. Studies with multiple outcomes were counted more than once; collectively they assessed 74 different outcomes. Thirty-two studies, 6 with low risks of bias (LRoB), provided evidence that whites received more inappropriate or nonrecommended care than racial/ethnic minorities did. Nine studies (2 LRoB) found evidence of more overuse of care by minorities than by whites. Thirty-three studies (6 LRoB) found no relationship between race/ethnicity and overuse.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the overuse of care is not invariably associated with race/ethnicity, when it was, a substantial proportion of studies found greater overuse of care among white patients. Clinicians and researchers should try to understand how and why race/ethnicity might be associated with overuse and to intervene to reduce it.
© 2015 Milbank Memorial Fund.

Entities:  

Keywords:  guideline adherence; inappropriate test; inappropriate utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25752352      PMCID: PMC4364433          DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Milbank Q        ISSN: 0887-378X            Impact factor:   4.911


  90 in total

1.  Underuse and overuse of diagnostic testing for coronary artery disease in patients presenting with new-onset chest pain.

Authors:  D M Carlisle; L L Leape; S Bickel; R Bell; C Kamberg; B Genovese; W J French; V S Kaushik; P R Mahrer; M H Ellestad; R H Brook; M F Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 2.  The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality.

Authors:  M R Chassin; R W Galvin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-09-16       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Health insurance and access to primary care for children.

Authors:  P W Newacheck; J J Stoddard; D C Hughes; M Pearl
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Antibiotic prescribing for adults with colds, upper respiratory tract infections, and bronchitis by ambulatory care physicians.

Authors:  R Gonzales; J F Steiner; M A Sande
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-09-17       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Blacks in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS): race and clinical decision making.

Authors:  C Maynard; L D Fisher; E R Passamani; T Pullum
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Predicting the appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and coronary angiography.

Authors:  R H Brook; R E Park; M R Chassin; D H Solomon; J Keesey; J Kosecoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-10-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Antibiotic prescribing for children with colds, upper respiratory tract infections, and bronchitis.

Authors:  A C Nyquist; R Gonzales; J F Steiner; M A Sande
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-03-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The relationship between perceived parental expectations and pediatrician antimicrobial prescribing behavior.

Authors:  R Mangione-Smith; E A McGlynn; M N Elliott; P Krogstad; R H Brook
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Quality of US outpatient care: temporal changes and racial/ethnic disparities.

Authors:  Jun Ma; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-06-27

10.  Trends in antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infection in veterans with spinal cord injury and disorder.

Authors:  Charlesnika T Evans; Bridget Smith; Jorge P Parada; Jibby E Kurichi; Frances M Weaver
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  19 in total

1.  Payer Type and Low-Value Care: Comparing Choosing Wisely Services across Commercial and Medicare Populations.

Authors:  Carrie H Colla; Nancy E Morden; Thomas D Sequist; Alexander J Mainor; Zhonghe Li; Meredith B Rosenthal
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Do race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status affect why we place ear tubes in children?

Authors:  Carrie L Nieman; David E Tunkel; Emily F Boss
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 1.675

3.  Reducing Medical Waste to Improve Equity in Care.

Authors:  Dora L Hughes; Phyllis D Meadows
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Racial Disparities Vary by Patient Life Expectancy in Screening for Breast, Prostate, and Colorectal Cancers.

Authors:  Nancy L Schoenborn; Jin Huang; Cynthia M Boyd; Craig E Pollack
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Examining Trends in Obstetric Quality Measures for Monitoring Health Care Disparities.

Authors:  Teresa Janevic; Natalia N Egorova; Jennifer Zeitlin; Amy Balbierz; Paul L Hebert; Elizabeth A Howell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  For Selected Services, Blacks And Hispanics More Likely To Receive Low-Value Care Than Whites.

Authors:  William L Schpero; Nancy E Morden; Thomas D Sequist; Meredith B Rosenthal; Daniel J Gottlieb; Carrie H Colla
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 7.  Quality of Care and Disparities in Obstetrics.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Howell; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Promoting Health Equity through De-Implementation Research.

Authors:  Christian D Helfrich; Christine W Hartmann; Toral J Parikh; David H Au
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 1.847

9.  Socioeconomic Differences in Use of Low-Value Cancer Screenings and Distributional Effects in Medicare.

Authors:  Wendy Yi Xu; Jeah Kyoungrae Jung
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 10.  Using rising tides to lift all boats: Equity-focused quality improvement as a tool to reduce neonatal health disparities.

Authors:  Vicky Reichman; Sandhya S Brachio; Chinonyerem R Madu; Diana Montoya-Williams; Michelle-Marie Peña
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.