Literature DB >> 25878188

Physician perspectives on colorectal cancer surveillance care in a changing environment.

Jane Zapka1, Katherine R Sterba2, Nancy LaPelle3, Kent Armeson2, Dana R Burshell2, Marvella E Ford2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this formative qualitatively driven mixed-methods study was to refine a measurement tool for use in interventions to improve colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance care. We employed key informant interviews to explore the attitudes, practices, and preferences of four physician specialties. A national survey, literature review, and expert consultation also informed survey development. Cognitive pretesting obtained participant feedback to improve the survey's face and content validity and reliability. Results showed that additional domains were needed to reflect contemporary interdisciplinary trends in survivorship care, evolving practice changes and current health policy. Observed dissonance in specialists' perspectives poses challenges for the development of interventions and psychometrically sound measurement. Implications for future research include need for a flexible care model with enhanced communication and role definitions among clinical specialists, improvements in surveillance at multilevels (patients, providers, and systems), and measurement tools that focus on multispecialty involvement and the changing practice and policy environment.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; instrument development; qualitative; research, mixed methods

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25878188      PMCID: PMC5973790          DOI: 10.1177/1049732315580557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  54 in total

1.  The use of cancer treatment summaries and care plans among Massachusetts physicians.

Authors:  Anna Merport; Stephenie C Lemon; Joshua Nyambose; Marianne N Prout
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Models of care for post-treatment follow-up of adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  D Howell; T F Hack; T K Oliver; T Chulak; S Mayo; M Aubin; M Chasen; C C Earle; A J Friedman; E Green; G W Jones; J M Jones; M Parkinson; N Payeur; C M Sabiston; S Sinclair
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative.

Authors:  Michael N Neuss; Christopher E Desch; Kristen K McNiff; Peter D Eisenberg; Dean H Gesme; Joseph O Jacobson; Mohammad Jahanzeb; Jennifer J Padberg; John M Rainey; Jeff J Guo; Joseph V Simone
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Patient perceptions of communications on the threshold of cancer survivorship: implications for provider responses.

Authors:  Sally E Thorne; Kelli I Stajduhar
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 4.442

6.  Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population.

Authors:  James S Goodwin; Amanpal Singh; Nischita Reddy; Taylor S Riall; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-09

7.  Differences between primary care physicians' and oncologists' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the care of cancer survivors.

Authors:  Arnold L Potosky; Paul K J Han; Julia Rowland; Carrie N Klabunde; Tenbroeck Smith; Noreen Aziz; Craig Earle; John Z Ayanian; Patricia A Ganz; Michael Stefanek
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Primary care physicians' views of routine follow-up care of cancer survivors.

Authors:  M Elisabeth Del Giudice; Eva Grunfeld; Bart J Harvey; Eugenia Piliotis; Sunil Verma
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Physicians' beliefs about breast cancer surveillance testing are consistent with test overuse.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Carrie N Klabunde; Anne-Michelle Noone; Craig C Earle; John Z Ayanian; Patricia A Ganz; Katherine S Virgo; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Physician roles in the cancer-related follow-up care of cancer survivors.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Paul K J Han; Craig C Earle; Tenbroeck Smith; John Z Ayanian; Richard Lee; Anita Ambs; Julia H Rowland; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of patient perspectives on surveillance after colorectal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Julia R Berian; Amanda Cuddy; Amanda B Francescatti; Linda O'Dwyer; Y Nancy You; Robert J Volk; George J Chang
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Surveillance for colorectal cancer survivors in an integrated safety-net health system in the United States.

Authors:  Bijal A Balasubramanian; Katelyn K Jetelina; Michael Bowen; Noel O Santini; Simon Craddock Lee
Journal:  Int J Care Coord       Date:  2018-06-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.