Literature DB >> 24098071

Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy.

Philip S Schoenfeld1, Jonathan Cohen.   

Abstract

The growing importance of colonoscopy in the prevention of colorectal cancer has stimulated an effort to identify and track quality indicators for this procedure. Several factors have been identified so far which are readily measurable and in many cases have been associated with improved patient outcomes. There is also ample evidence of variations in performance of this procedure. As a result, gathering data about quality indicators may play a vital role in the process of continuous quality improvement. Quality indicators for colonoscopy in colorectal cancer prevention are described along with the evidence that supports their use in benchmarking, quality reporting, and continuous quality improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon cancer; Colon polyps; Colonoscopy; Quality indicators; Screening; Surveillance

Year:  2013        PMID: 24098071      PMCID: PMC3790322          DOI: 10.1016/j.tgie.2013.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 1096-2883


  142 in total

1.  Still photography versus videotaping for documentation of cecal intubation: a prospective study.

Authors:  D K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy and residual gastric fluid volume: an observational study.

Authors:  Melanie Huffman; R Zackary Unger; Chandana Thatikonda; Sable Amstutz; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates.

Authors:  D K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population.

Authors:  James S Goodwin; Amanpal Singh; Nischita Reddy; Taylor S Riall; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-09

5.  Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Dennis J Ahnen; John A Baron; Kenneth P Batts; Carol A Burke; Randall W Burt; John R Goldblum; José G Guillem; Charles J Kahi; Matthew F Kalady; Michael J O'Brien; Robert D Odze; Shuji Ogino; Susan Parry; Dale C Snover; Emina Emilia Torlakovic; Paul E Wise; Joanne Young; James Church
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.

Authors:  D K Rex; E Y Rahmani; J H Haseman; G T Lemmel; S Kaster; J S Buckley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  The European panel on the appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy guidelines colonoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit: a prospective study.

Authors:  F Balaguer; J Llach; A Castells; J M Bordas; M Ppellisé; F Rodríguez-Moranta; A Mata; G Fernández-Esparrach; A Ginès; J M Piqué
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 8.171

8.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

Authors:  Florian Froehlich; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Bernard Burnand; John-Paul Vader
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Thomas F Imperiale; Danielle R Latinovich; L Lisa Bratcher
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Detachable snare versus epinephrine injection in the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding: a randomized and controlled study.

Authors:  P Di Giorgio; L De Luca; G Calcagno; G Rivellini; M Mandato; B De Luca
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  11 in total

1.  Is there a proximal shift in the distribution of colorectal adenomas?

Authors:  Ana Maria Freire de Oliveira; Vera Anapaz; Luís Lourenço; Catarina Graça Rodrigues; Sara Folgado Alberto; Alexandra Martins; João Ramos de Deus; Jorge Reis
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Modifiable lifestyle factors associated with risk of sessile serrated polyps, conventional adenomas and hyperplastic polyps.

Authors:  James R Davenport; Timothy Su; Zhiguo Zhao; Helen G Coleman; Walter E Smalley; Reid M Ness; Wei Zheng; Martha J Shrubsole
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Risk factors associated with longer cecal intubation time: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Veeravich Jaruvongvanich; Tomoki Sempokuya; Passisd Laoveeravat; Patompong Ungprasert
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Increasing colonoscopy screening in disparate populations: Results from an evaluation of patient navigation in the New Hampshire Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Ketra Rice; Lindsay Gressard; Amy DeGroff; Joanne Gersten; Janene Robie; Steven Leadbetter; Rebecca Glover-Kudon; Lynn Butterly
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Do Consultants Follow Up on Tests They Recommend? Insights from an Academic Inpatient Gastrointestinal Consult Service.

Authors:  Benjamin E Cassell; Ted Walker; Saad Alghamdi; Jason Bill; Pierre Blais; Harold Boutté; Jeffrey W Brown; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Almost One-Third of Large Sessile Serrated Polyps Are Missed on CT Colonography.

Authors:  Manish Singla; Jean D Kemp; Michael E Goldberg; Vito V Cirigliano; Gilda M Bobele; Ganesh R Veerappan; Patrick E Young
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Cecal intubation time in screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hyun Young Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Impact of the quality of bowel cleansing on the efficacy of colonic cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, blinded study.

Authors:  Jürgen Pohl; Marc Halphen; Hans Rudolf Kloess; Wolfgang Fischbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Revision of Quality Indicators for the Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program of the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea.

Authors:  Jun Ki Min; Jae Myung Cha; Yu Kyung Cho; Jie-Hyun Kim; Soon Man Yoon; Jong Pil Im; Yunho Jung; Jeong Seop Moon; Jin-Oh Kim; Yoon Tae Jeen
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2018-05-31

10.  Prevalence of 'one and done' in adenoma detection rates: results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.

Authors:  Stacey A Fedewa; Joseph C Anderson; Christina M Robinson; Julie E Weiss; Robert A Smith; Rebecca L Siegel; Ahmedin Jemal; Lynn F Butterly
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-10-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.