Literature DB >> 26292664

Quality in Colonoscopy.

Katherine T Brunner1, Audrey H Calderwood.   

Abstract

Quality metrics in colonoscopy are a growing area of focus given the development of and need for associated reporting and potential financial penalties. Three areas specifically have been identified as important by a multi-society task force, and the evidence behind each has been presented here. These metrics are adenoma detection rate, appropriate screening interval, and cecal intubation rate. Additional factors of interest include bowel preparation cleanliness and endoscope withdrawal time. Multifaceted interventions have been implemented to improve outcomes in colonoscopy with mixed success. Given that there are some quality metrics that have been shown to impact colorectal cancer outcomes, additional research should focus on disseminating these methods in a consistent and effective way across a myriad of practice models and patient populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26292664     DOI: 10.1007/s11894-015-0461-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep        ISSN: 1522-8037


  41 in total

1.  Predictors of Poor Adherence of US Gastroenterologists with Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance Guidelines.

Authors:  Heba Iskandar; Yan Yan; Jill Elwing; Dayna Early; Graham A Colditz; Jean S Wang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Profiling the quality of care in twelve communities: results from the CQI study.

Authors:  Eve A Kerr; Elizabeth A McGlynn; John Adams; Joan Keesey; Steven M Asch
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Reena V Chokshi; Christine E Hovis; Thomas Hollander; Dayna S Early; Jean S Wang
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Quality improvement for the ambulatory surgery center.

Authors:  Bret T Petersen
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Polypectomy rate is a valid quality measure for colonoscopy: results from a national endoscopy database.

Authors:  Jason E Williams; Jennifer L Holub; Douglas O Faigel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population.

Authors:  James S Goodwin; Amanpal Singh; Nischita Reddy; Taylor S Riall; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-09

7.  Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Rinku Sutradhar; Shawn S Forbes; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Impact of patient education with cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jae Woong Tae; Jong Chan Lee; Su Jin Hong; Jae Pil Han; Yun Hee Lee; Jong Ho Chung; Hyung Geun Yoon; Bong Min Ko; Joo Young Cho; Joon Seong Lee; Moon Sung Lee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume.

Authors:  Albert Do; Janice Weinberg; Aarti Kakkar; Brian C Jacobson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  The impact of fair colonoscopy preparation on colonoscopy use and adenoma miss rates in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy.

Authors:  Stacy B Menees; H Myra Kim; Eric E Elliott; Jennifer L Mickevicius; Brittany B Graustein; Philip S Schoenfeld
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  2 in total

1.  Synchronous pathologic findings in patients with colorectal cancer and preoperative incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  Carolin Krause; W Kruis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Analysis of population-based colorectal cancer screening in Guangzhou, 2011-2015.

Authors:  Feng Zhiqiang; Cao Jie; Nie Yuqiang; Gong Chenghua; Wang Hong; Sun Zheng; Li Wanglin; Zhou Yongjian; Dai Liping; Zeng Lizhong; Zhao DeJian
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.452

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.