Literature DB >> 21547418

Unpacking the blockers: understanding perceptions and social constraints of health communication in hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) susceptibility families.

June A Peters1, Regina Kenen, Lindsey M Hoskins, Laura M Koehly, Barry Graubard, Jennifer T Loud, Mark H Greene.   

Abstract

Family communication is essential for accurate cancer risk assessment and counseling; family blockers play a role in this communication process. This qualitative analysis of social exchanges is an extension of earlier work characterizing those who are perceived by study participants as health information gatherers, disseminators, and blockers within families with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) susceptibility. Eighty-nine women, ages 23-56 years, enrolled in a Breast Imaging Study (BIS) and participated in a sub-study utilizing a social assessment tool known as the Colored Ecological Genetic Relational Map (CEGRM). Purposive sampling ensured that participants varied according to numbers of participating family members e.g., ranging from 1 to 6. Eighty-nine women from 42 families (1-8 relatives/family) participated. They collectively designated 65 blockers, both male and female. Situational factors, beliefs, attitudes and cultural traditions, privacy and protectiveness comprised perceived reasons for blocking intra-family health communications. Longitudinal data collected over 4 years showed families where blocking behavior was universally recognized and stable over time, as well as other families where blocking was less consistent. Self-blocking was observed among a significant minority of participating women. Blocking of health communications among family members with HBOC was variable, complex, and multifaceted. The reasons for blocking were heterogeneous; duration of the blocking appeared to depend on the reasons for blocking. Blocking often seemed to involve bi-directional feedback loops, in keeping with Lepore's Social Constraints and Modulation Theory. Privacy and protectiveness predominated as explanations for long-term blocking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21547418      PMCID: PMC3412366          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-011-9370-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  45 in total

1.  Stigmatization and male identity: Norwegian males' experience after identification as BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Nina Strømsvik; Målfrid Råheim; Nina Oyen; Lars Fredrik Engebretsen; Eva Gjengedal
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Deliberate deceit of family members: a challenge to providers of clinical genetics services.

Authors:  Jennifer T Loud; Nancy E Weissman; June A Peters; Ruthann M Giusti; Benjamin S Wilfond; Wylie Burke; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Family system characteristics and psychological adjustment to cancer susceptibility genetic testing: a prospective study.

Authors:  I van Oostrom; H Meijers-Heijboer; H J Duivenvoorden; A H J T Bröcker-Vriends; C J van Asperen; R H Sijmons; C Seynaeve; A R van Gool; J G M Klijn; A Tibben
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 4.  A model for the development of genetics education programs for health professionals.

Authors:  Clara L Gaff; MaryAnne Aitken; Anna Flouris; Sylvia A Metcalfe
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 5.  Communicating genetic information in families--a review of guidelines and position papers.

Authors:  Laura E Forrest; Martin B Delatycki; Loane Skene; MaryAnne Aitken
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Cancer Incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Deborah Thompson; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  We are talking, but are they listening? Communication patterns in families with a history of breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC).

Authors:  Regina Kenen; Audrey Arden-Jones; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Sisters in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: communal coping, social integration, and psychological well-being.

Authors:  Laura M Koehly; June A Peters; Natalia Kuhn; Lindsey Hoskins; Anne Letocha; Regina Kenen; Jennifer Loud; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Exploratory study of the feasibility and utility of the colored eco-genetic relationship map (CEGRM) in women at high genetic risk of developing breast cancer.

Authors:  June A Peters; Regina Kenen; Ruthann Giusti; Jennifer Loud; Nancy Weissman; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Ductal lavage in women from BRCA1/2 families: is there a future for ductal lavage in women at increased genetic risk of breast cancer?

Authors:  Jennifer T Loud; Anne C M Thiébaut; Andrea D Abati; Armando C Filie; Kathryn Nichols; David Danforth; Ruthann Giusti; Sheila A Prindiville; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  17 in total

1.  Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Rebecca Branum; Barbara A Koenig; Gloria M Petersen; Susan A Berry; Laura M Beskow; Mary B Daly; Conrad V Fernandez; Robert C Green; Bonnie S LeRoy; Noralane M Lindor; P Pearl O'Rourke; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Mark A Rothstein; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Legacies and Relationships: Diverse Social Networks and BRCA1/2 Risk Management Decisions and Actions.

Authors:  Anne L Ersig; Allison Werner-Lin; Lindsey Hoskins; Jennifer Young; Jennifer T Loud; June Peters; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Fam Nurs       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.818

3.  Family communication following BRCA1/2 genetic testing: a close look at the process.

Authors:  Darquise Lafrenière; Karine Bouchard; Béatrice Godard; Jacques Simard; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Female family members lack understanding of indeterminate negative BRCA1/2 test results shared by probands.

Authors:  Deborah O Himes; Deborah K Gibbons; Wendy C Birmingham; Renea L Beckstrand; Amanda Gammon; Anita Y Kinney; Margaret F Clayton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Patients' Attitudes Towards Disclosure of Genetic Test Results to Family Members: The Impact of Patients' Sociodemographic Background and Counseling Experience.

Authors:  Roy Gilbar; Stavit Shalev; Ronen Spiegel; Elon Pras; Michal Berkenstadt; Michal Sagi; Adi Ben-Yehuda; Pnina Mor; Shlomit Perry; Tzipora Falik Zaccai; Zvi Borochowitz; Sivia Barnoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Easing the Burden: Describing the Role of Social, Emotional and Spiritual Support in Research Families with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome.

Authors:  June A Peters; Regina Kenen; Renee Bremer; Shannon Givens; Sharon A Savage; Phuong L Mai
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Facilitators and Challenges in Psychosocial Adaptation to Being at Increased Familial Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Louise Heiniger; Melanie A Price; Margaret Charles; Phyllis N Butow
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  A Relational Approach to Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Rowan Forbes Shepherd; Tamara Kayali Browne; Linda Warwick
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  How can psychological science inform research about genetic counseling for clinical genomic sequencing?

Authors:  Cynthia M Khan; Christine Rini; Barbara A Bernhardt; J Scott Roberts; Kurt D Christensen; James P Evans; Kyle B Brothers; Myra I Roche; Jonathan S Berg; Gail E Henderson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Through the looking glass: an exploratory study of the lived experiences and unmet needs of families affected by Von Hippel-Lindau disease.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Alison Rutstein; Ursula M Sansom-Daly; Shab Mireskandari; Janet Tyler; Jessica Duffy; Katherine M Tucker
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.