Literature DB >> 25735441

Facilitators and Challenges in Psychosocial Adaptation to Being at Increased Familial Risk of Breast Cancer.

Louise Heiniger1,2, Melanie A Price3,4, Margaret Charles4, Phyllis N Butow3,4.   

Abstract

Little is known about the process of psychosocial adaptation to familial risk in tested and untested individuals at increased familial risk of cancer. This paper presents findings from a qualitative study of 36 women participating in the Kathleen Cuningham Consortium for Research into Familial Breast cancer (kConFab) Psychosocial study. Facilitators and challenges in psychosocial adaptation were identified through semi-structured interviews. The women, who were either tested (carriers or non-carriers of breast cancer susceptibility mutations) or untested (ineligible for testing or eligible but delayed or declined testing), described personal, support network and healthcare characteristics that impacted on the adaptation process. Challenges in one domain could be overcome by facilitators in other domains and key differences relating to whether women had undergone testing, or not, were identified. Tested and untested women with an increased familial risk of breast cancer may benefit from support tailored to their mutation testing status in order to enhance adaptation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Declined; Delayed; Genetic testing; Ineligible for testing; Psychosocial adaptation; Qualitative

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25735441     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9824-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  58 in total

1.  The role of hope in adaptation to uncertainty: the experience of caregivers of children with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Megan Truitt; Barbara Biesecker; George Capone; Thomas Bailey; Lori Erby
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-09-21

2.  Factors associated with decisions about clinical BRCA1/2 testing.

Authors:  K Armstrong; K Calzone; J Stopfer; G Fitzgerald; J Coyne; B Weber
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Betty Chewning; Carma L Bylund; Bupendra Shah; Neeraj K Arora; Jennifer A Gueguen; Gregory Makoul
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-04-06

4.  The role of disease perceptions and results sharing in psychological adaptation after genetic susceptibility testing: the REVEAL Study.

Authors:  Sato Ashida; Laura M Koehly; J Scott Roberts; Clara A Chen; Susan Hiraki; Robert C Green
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Psychological distress in women seeking genetic counseling for breast-ovarian cancer risk: the contributions of personality and appraisal.

Authors:  J Audrain; M D Schwartz; C Lerman; C Hughes; B N Peshkin; B Biesecker
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1997

Review 6.  Adaptation to living with a genetic condition or risk: a mini-review.

Authors:  B B Biesecker; L Erby
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Non-uptake of predictive genetic testing for BRCA1/2 among relatives of known carriers: attributes, cancer worry, and barriers to testing in a multicenter clinical cohort.

Authors:  C Foster; D G R Evans; R Eeles; D Eccles; S Ashley; L Brooks; T Cole; J Cook; R Davidson; H Gregory; J Mackay; P J Morrison; M Watson
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2004

Review 8.  Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Fiona Walter; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  The FAP self-concept scale (adult form).

Authors:  Mary Jane Esplen; Noreen Stuckless; Terri Berk; Kate Butler; Steve Gallinger
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Self-reported low self-esteem. Intervention and follow-up in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Søren Ventegodt; Suzett Thegler; Tove Andreasen; Flemming Struve; Lars Enevoldsen; Laila Bassaine; Margrethe Torp; Joav Merrick
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2007-02-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Population screening for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations: lessons from qualitative analysis of the screening experience.

Authors:  Sari Lieberman; Amnon Lahad; Ariela Tomer; Carmit Cohen; Ephrat Levy-Lahad; Aviad Raz
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 2.  When to Consider Risk-Reducing Mastectomy in BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Carriers with Advanced Stage Ovarian Cancer: a Case Study Illustrating the Genetic Counseling Challenges.

Authors:  Beverley Speight; Marc Tischkowitz
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 2.537

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.