Literature DB >> 17392704

Communicating genetic information in families--a review of guidelines and position papers.

Laura E Forrest1, Martin B Delatycki, Loane Skene, MaryAnne Aitken.   

Abstract

This article aims to review ethical and clinical guidelines and policies addressing the communication of genetic information in families. Websites of national and regional bioethics committees, national human genetics societies, international health organisations, genetic interest groups and legal recommendations committees were searched for guidelines and policies. The databases Medline, Web of Science and Google Scholar were also utilised to search for additional guidelines relating to the communication of genetic information in families. The guidelines and policies included in this review are limited to those available in English. The search resulted in guidelines from 18 international, regional and national organisations from six countries pertaining to family communication of genetic information. The following ideals were common in their guidelines: (1) individuals have a moral obligation to communicate genetic information to their family members; (2) genetic health professionals should encourage individuals to communicate this information to their family members; and (3) genetic health professionals should support individuals throughout the communication process. The difference between the organisations' guidelines was the inclusion of information about the role of the health professional in supporting clients during the process of communicating genetic information to their family members. Only two recommendations suggested that the health professional should support their clients by identifying at-risk family members, but more guidelines recommended that directive counselling should be undertaken to encourage clients to communicate genetic information to their family members. In conclusion, the guidelines provide an overview of the role that genetic health professionals may undertake; however, there are gaps that need to be addressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17392704     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  48 in total

1.  Disclosing cancer genetic information within families: perspectives of counselees and their at-risk relatives.

Authors:  Afsaneh Hayat Roshanai; Claudia Lampic; Richard Rosenquist; Karin Nordin
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Rebecca Branum; Barbara A Koenig; Gloria M Petersen; Susan A Berry; Laura M Beskow; Mary B Daly; Conrad V Fernandez; Robert C Green; Bonnie S LeRoy; Noralane M Lindor; P Pearl O'Rourke; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Mark A Rothstein; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 3.  How communication of genetic information within the family is addressed in genetic counselling: a systematic review of research evidence.

Authors:  Álvaro Mendes; Milena Paneque; Liliana Sousa; Angus Clarke; Jorge Sequeiros
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  Factors influencing intrafamilial communication of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic information.

Authors:  Gillian Nycum; Denise Avard; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Unsolicited information letters to increase awareness of Lynch syndrome and familial colorectal cancer: reactions and attitudes.

Authors:  Helle Vendel Petersen; Birgitte Lidegaard Frederiksen; Charlotte Kvist Lautrup; Lars Joachim Lindberg; Steen Ladelund; Mef Nilbert
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Unpacking the blockers: understanding perceptions and social constraints of health communication in hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) susceptibility families.

Authors:  June A Peters; Regina Kenen; Lindsey M Hoskins; Laura M Koehly; Barry Graubard; Jennifer T Loud; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) molecular diagnosis: from traditional technology to the NGS era.

Authors:  Stefania Zampatti; Luca Colantoni; Claudia Strafella; Rosaria Maria Galota; Valerio Caputo; Giulia Campoli; Giulia Pagliaroli; Stefania Carboni; Julia Mela; Cristina Peconi; Stefano Gambardella; Raffaella Cascella; Emiliano Giardina
Journal:  Neurogenetics       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.660

8.  The uptake of presymptomatic genetic testing in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome: a systematic review of the literature and implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Fred H Menko; Jacqueline A Ter Stege; Lizet E van der Kolk; Kiki N Jeanson; Winnie Schats; Daoud Ait Moha; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Evaluating the utilization of educational materials in communicating about Lynch syndrome to at-risk relatives.

Authors:  Kristen Dilzell; Kerry Kingham; Kelly Ormond; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Communicating with Daughters About Familial Risk of Breast Cancer: Individual, Family, and Provider Influences on Women's Knowledge of Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Lucy A Peipins; Juan L Rodriguez; Nikki A Hawkins; Ashwini Soman; Mary C White; M Elizabeth Hodgson; Lisa A DeRoo; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.