Literature DB >> 26371363

Patients' Attitudes Towards Disclosure of Genetic Test Results to Family Members: The Impact of Patients' Sociodemographic Background and Counseling Experience.

Roy Gilbar1, Stavit Shalev2, Ronen Spiegel3, Elon Pras4, Michal Berkenstadt4, Michal Sagi5, Adi Ben-Yehuda6, Pnina Mor6, Shlomit Perry7, Tzipora Falik Zaccai8, Zvi Borochowitz9, Sivia Barnoy10.   

Abstract

Many factors predict the intention to disclose genetic information to relatives. The article examines the impact of patients' socio-demographic factors on their intention to disclose genetic testing results to their relatives. Data were collected in eight genetic clinics in Israel. Patients were requested to fill in a questionnaire after counseling. A convenience sample of 564 participants who visited these clinics was collected for a response rate of 85 %. Of them, 282 participants came for susceptibility testing for hereditary cancers (cancer group), and 282 for genetic screening tests (prenatal group). In the cancer group, being secular and having more years of education correlated positively with the intention to disclose test results to relatives. In the prenatal group, being married and female correlated positively with the intention to disclose. In the cancer group, being religious and with less years of education correlated positively with the view that the clinician should deliver the results to the family. In the prenatal group, being male and unmarried correlated positively with this belief. In both groups, being of young age correlated with the perception that genetic information is private. Varied sociodemographic factors affect the intention to inform family members. Thus, knowing the social background of patients will shed light on people's attitudes to genetic information and will help clinicians provide effective counseling in discussions with patients about the implications of test results for relatives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disclosure; Family; Genetic information; Israel; Relatives

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26371363     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9873-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  27 in total

Review 1.  Communicating genetic risk information within families: a review.

Authors:  Mel Wiseman; Caroline Dancyger; Susan Michie
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Predictive testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: motivation, illness representations and short-term psychological impact.

Authors:  Erna Claes; Lieve Denayer; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Andrea Boogaerts; Eric Legius
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-11

3.  Facilitating family communication about predictive genetic testing: probands' perceptions.

Authors:  Clara L Gaff; Veronica Collins; Tiffany Symes; Jane Halliday
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Family system characteristics and psychological adjustment to cancer susceptibility genetic testing: a prospective study.

Authors:  I van Oostrom; H Meijers-Heijboer; H J Duivenvoorden; A H J T Bröcker-Vriends; C J van Asperen; R H Sijmons; C Seynaeve; A R van Gool; J G M Klijn; A Tibben
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 5.  Factors influencing intrafamilial communication of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic information.

Authors:  Gillian Nycum; Denise Avard; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Family communication after melanoma diagnosis.

Authors:  Jennifer Hay; Elyse Shuk; Mary S Brady; Marianne Berwick; Jamie Ostroff; Allan Halpern
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2008-04

7.  Unpacking the blockers: understanding perceptions and social constraints of health communication in hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) susceptibility families.

Authors:  June A Peters; Regina Kenen; Lindsey M Hoskins; Laura M Koehly; Barry Graubard; Jennifer T Loud; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Disclosure pattern and follow-up after the molecular diagnosis of BRCA/CHEK2 mutations.

Authors:  D Kegelaers; W Merckx; P Odeurs; J van den Ende; B Blaumeiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Intention to communicate BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic test results to the family.

Authors:  Andrea M Barsevick; Susan V Montgomery; Karen Ruth; Eric A Ross; Brian L Egleston; Ruth Bingler; John Malick; Suzanne M Miller; Terrence P Cescon; Mary B Daly
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2008-04

10.  Diversity and uniformity in genetic responsibility: moral attitudes of patients, relatives and lay people in Germany and Israel.

Authors:  Aviad E Raz; Silke Schicktanz
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2009-07-24
View more
  2 in total

1.  'Is this knowledge mine and nobody else's? I don't feel that.' Patient views about consent, confidentiality and information-sharing in genetic medicine.

Authors:  Sandi Dheensa; Angela Fenwick; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  How to inform at-risk relatives? Attitudes of 1379 Dutch patients, relatives, and members of the general population.

Authors:  Lieke Marleen van den Heuvel; Daphne Stemkens; Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams; Floor Willeboordse; Imke Christiaans
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.537

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.