Literature DB >> 17204044

Family system characteristics and psychological adjustment to cancer susceptibility genetic testing: a prospective study.

I van Oostrom1, H Meijers-Heijboer, H J Duivenvoorden, A H J T Bröcker-Vriends, C J van Asperen, R H Sijmons, C Seynaeve, A R van Gool, J G M Klijn, A Tibben.   

Abstract

This study examined prospectively the contribution of family functioning, differentiation to parents, family communication and support from relatives to psychological distress in individuals undergoing genetic susceptibility testing for a known familial pathogenic BRCA1/2 or Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer-related mutation. Family functioning, differentiation to parents, hereditary cancer-related family communication and perceived support from relatives were assessed in 271 participants for genetic testing before test result disclosure. Hereditary cancer distress (assessed by the Impact of Event Scale) and cancer worry (assessed by the Cancer Worry Scale) were assessed before, 1 week after, and 6 months after test result disclosure. Participants reporting more cancer-related distress over the study period more frequently perceived the communication about hereditary cancer with relatives as inhibited, the nuclear family functioning as disengaged-rigid or enmeshed-chaotic, the support from partner as less than adequate and the relationship to mother as less differentiated. Especially, open communication regarding hereditary cancer and partner support may be important buffers against hereditary cancer distress. Identifying individuals with insufficient sources of support and addressing the family communication concerning hereditary cancer in genetic counseling may help the counselee to adjust better to genetic testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17204044     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00731.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  30 in total

1.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Factors influencing intrafamilial communication of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic information.

Authors:  Gillian Nycum; Denise Avard; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Unpacking the blockers: understanding perceptions and social constraints of health communication in hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) susceptibility families.

Authors:  June A Peters; Regina Kenen; Lindsey M Hoskins; Laura M Koehly; Barry Graubard; Jennifer T Loud; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Disclosing the disclosure: factors associated with communicating the results of genetic susceptibility testing for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Sato Ashida; Laura M Koehly; J Scott Roberts; Clara A Chen; Susan Hiraki; Robert C Green
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009-12

5.  Families' experience of oncogenetic counselling: accounts from a heterogeneous hereditary cancer risk population.

Authors:  Álvaro Mendes; Liliana Sousa
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Family communication following BRCA1/2 genetic testing: a close look at the process.

Authors:  Darquise Lafrenière; Karine Bouchard; Béatrice Godard; Jacques Simard; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  A Family-Centered Model for Sharing Genetic Risk.

Authors:  Mary B Daly
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  Family health information sharing among older adults: reaching more family members.

Authors:  Sato Ashida; Ellen J Schafer
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-07-30

9.  Role of parenting relationship quality in communicating about maternal BRCA1/2 genetic test results with children.

Authors:  Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine A Schneider; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Is the psychological impact of genetic testing moderated by support and sharing of test results to family and friends?

Authors:  Julie Lapointe; Michel Dorval; Catherine Noguès; Roxane Fabre; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.