Literature DB >> 18688790

Sisters in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: communal coping, social integration, and psychological well-being.

Laura M Koehly1, June A Peters, Natalia Kuhn, Lindsey Hoskins, Anne Letocha, Regina Kenen, Jennifer Loud, Mark H Greene.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the association between psychological distress and indices of social integration and communal coping among sisters from hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) families. SAMPLE AND METHODS: Sixty-five sisters from 31 HBOC families completed the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 and the Colored Eco-Genetic Relationship Map, which identified members of participants' social support networks. Hierarchical linear models were used for all analyses to account for the clustering of sisters within families.
RESULTS: Intra-family correlation coefficients suggested that sisters shared perceptions of breast cancer risk and worry, but not ovarian cancer risk and worry. Further, sisters demonstrated shared levels of anxiety and somatization, but not depressive symptoms. Communal coping indices quantifying shared support resources were negatively related to anxiety and somatization. The number of persons with whom cancer risk information was shared exhibited a positive trend with somatization. Social integration, as measured by the size of participants' emotional support network, was negatively associated with anxiety. Lower depression scores were observed among participants with more persons playing multiple support roles and fewer persons providing tangible assistance.
CONCLUSION: Understanding how support relationships impact well-being among persons adjusting to HBOC risk, and the particular role of family in that process, will facilitate developing appropriate management approaches to help cancer-prone families adjust to their cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18688790      PMCID: PMC3125979          DOI: 10.1002/pon.1373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  34 in total

Review 1.  Coping: pitfalls and promise.

Authors:  Susan Folkman; Judith Tedlie Moskowitz
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Family system characteristics and psychological adjustment to cancer susceptibility genetic testing: a prospective study.

Authors:  I van Oostrom; H Meijers-Heijboer; H J Duivenvoorden; A H J T Bröcker-Vriends; C J van Asperen; R H Sijmons; C Seynaeve; A R van Gool; J G M Klijn; A Tibben
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  "Social separation" among women under 40 years of age diagnosed with breast cancer and carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  Regina Kenen; Audrey Ardern-Jones; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families III: risk perception and screening.

Authors:  Aideen McInerney-Leo; Donald Hadley; Ronald G Kase; Therese R Giambarresi; Jeffery P Struewing; Barbara Bowles Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Peer-support in coping with medical uncertainty: discussion of oophorectomy and hormone replacement therapy on a web-based message board.

Authors:  Regina H Kenen; Pamela J Shapiro; Susan Friedman; James C Coyne
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Associations between relationship support and psychological reactions of participants and partners to BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing in a clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Janet Audrain; Marc Schwartz; David Main; Clinton Finch; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2004-12

7.  Social ties: subgroup differences in costs and benefits.

Authors:  D Riley; J Eckenrode
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1986-10

8.  Chronic illness in couples: a case for emotionally focused therapy.

Authors:  John Kowal; Susan M Johnson; Alison Lee
Journal:  J Marital Fam Ther       Date:  2003-07

9.  Exploratory study of the feasibility and utility of the colored eco-genetic relationship map (CEGRM) in women at high genetic risk of developing breast cancer.

Authors:  June A Peters; Regina Kenen; Ruthann Giusti; Jennifer Loud; Nancy Weissman; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  The kin of the gene: the medicalization of family and kinship in American Society.

Authors:  K Finkler
Journal:  Curr Anthropol       Date:  2001-04
View more
  29 in total

1.  Stigmatization and male identity: Norwegian males' experience after identification as BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Nina Strømsvik; Målfrid Råheim; Nina Oyen; Lars Fredrik Engebretsen; Eva Gjengedal
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Changes in female support network systems and adaptation after breast cancer diagnosis: differences between older and younger patients.

Authors:  Sato Ashida; Aunchalee E L Palmquist; Karen Basen-Engquist; S Eva Singletary; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2009-05-22

3.  Unpacking the blockers: understanding perceptions and social constraints of health communication in hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) susceptibility families.

Authors:  June A Peters; Regina Kenen; Lindsey M Hoskins; Laura M Koehly; Barry Graubard; Jennifer T Loud; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  The importance of older family members in providing social resources and promoting cancer screening in families with a hereditary cancer syndrome.

Authors:  Sato Ashida; Donald W Hadley; Andrea F Goergen; Kaley F Skapinsky; Hillary C Devlin; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2011-05-11

5.  Disclosing the disclosure: factors associated with communicating the results of genetic susceptibility testing for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Sato Ashida; Laura M Koehly; J Scott Roberts; Clara A Chen; Susan Hiraki; Robert C Green
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009-12

6.  It's Interpersonal: Family Relationships, Genetic Risk, and Caregiving.

Authors:  Laura M Koehly
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2016-08-09

7.  Effects of racial and ethnic group and health literacy on responses to genomic risk information in a medically underserved population.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Jewel D Stafford; Lucy D'Agostino McGowan; Joann Seo; Christina R Lachance; Melody S Goodman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  Is the psychological impact of genetic testing moderated by support and sharing of test results to family and friends?

Authors:  Julie Lapointe; Michel Dorval; Catherine Noguès; Roxane Fabre; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Living With Genetic Vulnerability: a Life Course Perspective.

Authors:  Rebekah J Hamilton; Nancy A Innella; Dawn T Bounds
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  The role of religious and existential well-being in families with Lynch syndrome: prevention, family communication, and psychosocial adjustment.

Authors:  Bronwyn A Morris; Donald W Hadley; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.