Literature DB >> 19336560

Ductal lavage in women from BRCA1/2 families: is there a future for ductal lavage in women at increased genetic risk of breast cancer?

Jennifer T Loud1, Anne C M Thiébaut, Andrea D Abati, Armando C Filie, Kathryn Nichols, David Danforth, Ruthann Giusti, Sheila A Prindiville, Mark H Greene.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ductal lavage has been used for risk stratification and biomarker development and to identify intermediate endpoints for risk-reducing intervention trials. Little is known about patient characteristics associated with obtaining nipple aspirate fluid (NAF) and adequate cell counts (> or =10 cells) in ductal lavage specimens from BRCA mutation carriers.
METHODS: We evaluated patient characteristics associated with obtaining NAF and adequate cell counts in ductal lavage specimens from the largest cohort of women from BRCA families yet studied (BRCA1/2 = 146, mutation-negative = 23, untested = 2). Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate categorical variables; Wilcoxon nonparametric test was used to evaluate continuous variables associated with NAF or ductal lavage cell count adequacy. Logistic regression was used to identify independent correlates of NAF and ductal lavage cell count adequacy.
RESULTS: From 171 women, 45 (26%) women had NAF and 70 (41%) women had ductal lavage samples with > or =10 cells. Postmenopausal women with intact ovaries compared with premenopausal women [odds ratio (OR), 4.8; P = 0.03] and women without a prior breast cancer history (OR, 5.2; P = 0.04) had an increased likelihood of yielding NAF. Having breast-fed (OR, 3.4; P = 0.001), the presence of NAF before ductal lavage (OR, 3.2; P = 0.003), and being premenopausal (OR, 3.0; P = 0.003) increased the likelihood of ductal lavage cell count adequacy. In known BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, only breast-feeding (OR, 2.5; P = 0.01) and the presence of NAF (OR, 3.0; P = 0.01) were independent correlates of ductal lavage cell count adequacy.
CONCLUSIONS: Ductal lavage is unlikely to be useful in breast cancer screening among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers because the procedure fails to yield adequate specimens sufficient for reliable cytologic diagnosis or to support translational research activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19336560      PMCID: PMC2729059          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  37 in total

1.  Comparison of cytomorphology in specimens obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration and ductal lavage from women at high risk for development of breast cancer.

Authors:  Carola M Zalles; Bruce F Kimler; Marie Simonsen; Julie L Clark; Trina Metheny; Carol J Fabian
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Reproducibility of ductal lavage cytology and cellularity over a six month interval in high risk women.

Authors:  Deepa B Patil; Heather A Lankes; Ritu Nayar; Shahla Masood; Michelle Bryk; Nanjiang Hou; Alfred Rademaker; Seema A Khan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Is there a future for ductal lavage?

Authors:  Carol J Fabian
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Atypia and DNA methylation in nipple duct lavage in relation to predicted breast cancer risk.

Authors:  David M Euhus; Dawei Bu; Raheela Ashfaq; Xian-Jin Xie; Aihua Bian; A Marilyn Leitch; Cheryl M Lewis
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Presence of epithelial cells in nipple aspirate fluid is associated with subsequent breast cancer: a 25-year prospective study.

Authors:  Gertrude Case Buehring; Amy Letscher; Kathleen M McGirr; Shruti Khandhar; Lisa H Che; Christine T Nguyen; Adeline J Hackett
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Combined breast ductal lavage and ductal endoscopy for the evaluation of the high-risk breast: a feasibility study.

Authors:  David N Danforth; Andrea Abati; Armando Filie; Shiela A Prindiville; Diane Palmieri; Richard Simon; Thomas Ried; Patricia S Steeg
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  The use of ductal lavage as a screening tool in women at high risk for developing breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Catherine D Carruthers; Lori A Chapleskie; Mary Beth Flynn; Thomas G Frazier
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Comparison of ductal lavage and random periareolar fine needle aspiration as tissue acquisition methods in early breast cancer prevention trials.

Authors:  Banu Arun; Vicente Valero; Catherine Logan; Kristine Broglio; Edgardo Rivera; Abenaa Brewster; Guosheng Yin; Marjorie Green; Henry Kuerer; Yun Gong; Doris Browne; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Nour Sneige
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  The reliability of nipple aspirate and ductal lavage in women at increased risk for breast cancer--a potential tool for breast cancer risk assessment and biomarker evaluation.

Authors:  K Visvanathan; D Santor; S Z Ali; A Brewster; A Arnold; D K Armstrong; N E Davidson; K J Helzlsouer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Attitude towards prophylactic surgery and effects of genetic counselling in families with BRCA mutations. Austrian Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Group.

Authors:  T M Wagner; R Möslinger; G Langbauer; R Ahner; E Fleischmann; A Auterith; A Friedmann; T Helbich; C Zielinski; E Pittermann; M Seifert; P Oefner
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  12 in total

1.  Legacies and Relationships: Diverse Social Networks and BRCA1/2 Risk Management Decisions and Actions.

Authors:  Anne L Ersig; Allison Werner-Lin; Lindsey Hoskins; Jennifer Young; Jennifer T Loud; June Peters; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Fam Nurs       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.818

2.  Unpacking the blockers: understanding perceptions and social constraints of health communication in hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) susceptibility families.

Authors:  June A Peters; Regina Kenen; Lindsey M Hoskins; Laura M Koehly; Barry Graubard; Jennifer T Loud; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Circulating estrogens and estrogens within the breast among postmenopausal BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Jennifer T Loud; Gretchen L Gierach; Timothy D Veenstra; Roni T Falk; Kathryn Nichols; Allison Guttmann; Xia Xu; Mark H Greene; Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  An anthropomorphic phantom for quantitative evaluation of breast MRI.

Authors:  Melanie Freed; Jacco A de Zwart; Jennifer T Loud; Riham H El Khouli; Kyle J Myers; Mark H Greene; Jeff H Duyn; Aldo Badano
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Correlation of ductal lavage cytology with ductoscopy-directed duct excision histology in women at high risk for developing breast cancer: a prospective, single-institution trial.

Authors:  Amy E Cyr; Julie A Margenthaler; Jill Conway; Antonella L Rastelli; Rosa M Davila; Feng Gao; Jill R Dietz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Mammographic density does not differ between unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women at low-to-average risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Gretchen L Gierach; Jennifer T Loud; Catherine K Chow; Sheila A Prindiville; Jennifer Eng-Wong; Peter W Soballe; Claudia Giambartolomei; Phuong L Mai; Claudia E Galbo; Kathryn Nichols; Kathleen A Calzone; Celine Vachon; Mitchell H Gail; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Successful oxytocin-assisted nipple aspiration in women at increased risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk; Elsken van der Wall; Helen Meijrink; Xiaojuan Pan; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Margreet G E M Ausems; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Selective release of microRNA species from normal and malignant mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  Lucy Pigati; Sree C S Yaddanapudi; Ravi Iyengar; Dong-Ja Kim; Steven A Hearn; David Danforth; Michelle L Hastings; Dominik M Duelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Use of fiberoductoscopy for the management of pathological nipple discharge: ten years follow up of a single center in China.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Jie Li; Hongchuan Jiang; Mengxin Li
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-12

10.  Tolerability of breast ductal lavage in women from families at high genetic risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer T Loud; Ellen Burke Beckjord; Kathryn Nichols; June Peters; Ruthann Giusti; Mark H Greene
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.