Literature DB >> 21525213

Evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections.

Valérie Lalande1, Laurence Barrault, Sophie Wadel, Catherine Eckert, Jean-Claude Petit, Frédéric Barbut.   

Abstract

A new assay (illumigene C. difficile; Meridian Bioscience), based on the original loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay, was evaluated with 472 unformed stools from patients suspected of Clostridium difficile infection. Compared to the toxigenic culture, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 91.8, 99.1, 91.8, and 99.1% for the illumigene C. difficile assay and 69.4, 100, 100, and 96.6% for the cytotoxicity assay, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21525213      PMCID： PMC3147856          DOI： 10.1128/JCM.01835-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN： 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  17 in total

1.  Rapid and sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for Clostridium difficile detection challenges cytotoxin B cell test and culture as gold standard.

Authors:  Torbjörn Norén; Ingegärd Alriksson; Josefin Andersson; Thomas Akerlund; Magnus Unemo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Rapid detection of toxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile in diarrheal stools by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Frédéric Barbut; Mylena Braun; Béatrice Burghoffer; Valérie Lalande; Catherine Eckert
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by toxin detection kits: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tim Planche; Adamma Aghaizu; Richard Holliman; Peter Riley; Jan Poloniecki; Aodhán Breathnach; Sanjeev Krishna
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  Impact of strain type on detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of molecular diagnostic and enzyme immunoassay approaches.

Authors:  Fred C Tenover; Susan Novak-Weekley; Christopher W Woods; Lance R Peterson; Thomas Davis; Paul Schreckenberger; Ferric C Fang; Andre Dascal; Dale N Gerding; Jim H Nomura; Richard V Goering; Thomas Akerlund; Alice S Weissfeld; Ellen Jo Baron; Edith Wong; Elizabeth M Marlowe; Joseph Whitmore; David H Persing
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea: a plea for culture.

Authors:  Michel Delmée; Johan Van Broeck; Anne Simon; Michèle Janssens; Véronique Avesani
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples.

Authors:  Paul D Stamper; Romina Alcabasa; Deborah Aird; Wisal Babiker; Jennifer Wehrlin; Ijeoma Ikpeama; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of nine commercially available Clostridium difficile toxin detection assays, a real-time PCR assay for C. difficile tcdB, and a glutamate dehydrogenase detection assay to cytotoxin testing and cytotoxigenic culture methods.

Authors:  Kerrie Eastwood; Patrick Else; André Charlett; Mark Wilcox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Renewed interest in a difficult disease: Clostridium difficile infections--epidemiology and current treatment strategies.

Authors:  Lynne V McFarland
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.287

9.  Comparison of a rapid molecular method, the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay, to the most frequently used laboratory tests for detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in diarrheal feces.

Authors:  Gabriella Terhes; Edit Urbán; József Sóki; Eniko Nacsa; Elisabeth Nagy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparison of a commercial multiplex real-time PCR to the cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay for diagnosis of clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Haihui Huang; Andrej Weintraub; Hong Fang; Carl Erik Nord
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 5.948
View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John C O'Horo; Amy Jones; Matthew Sternke; Christopher Harper; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Clostridioides difficile laboratory diagnostic techniques: a comparative approach of rapid and molecular methods.

Authors:  Thais Simões Camargo; Moacyr Silva Junior; Luis Fernando Aranha Camargo; Veronica Pivetta Biotto; André Mario Doi; Paula Celia Mariko Koga; Carolina Nunes França; Marines Dalla Valle Martino
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 2.552

3.  Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of the cell culture neutralization, Xpert C. difficile, Xpert C. difficile/Epi, and Illumigene C. difficile assays.

Authors:  P Pancholi; C Kelly; M Raczkowski; J M Balada-Llasat
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Detection of Streptococcus pyogenes by use of Illumigene group A Streptococcus assay.

Authors:  Amanda M Henson; Donna Carter; Kathleen Todd; Stanford T Shulman; Xiaotian Zheng
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection can molecular amplification methods move us out of uncertainty?

Authors:  Fred C Tenover; Ellen Jo Baron; Lance R Peterson; David H Persing
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 5.568

6.  Molecular test based on isothermal helicase-dependent amplification for detection of the Clostridium difficile toxin A gene.

Authors:  Catherine Eckert; Eleonore Holscher; Amandine Petit; Valérie Lalande; Frédéric Barbut
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Reply to "Comparison of detection methods for Clostridium difficile".

Authors:  P Pancholi; C Kelly; M Raczkowski; J M Balada-Llasat
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of detection methods for Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Monica Ianosi-Irimie; Dawn Morong; Catherine Dragoni; Stanley Schofield
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection in Children: Patient Risk Factors and Markers of Intestinal Inflammation.

Authors:  Maribeth R Nicholson; Jonathan D Crews; Jeffrey R Starke; Zhi-Dong Jiang; Herbert DuPont; Kathryn Edwards
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Comparison of Illumigene, Simplexa, and AmpliVue Clostridium difficile molecular assays for diagnosis of C. difficile infection.

Authors:  E Deak; S A Miller; R M Humphries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.948
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.