Literature DB >> 23592855

Reply to "Comparison of detection methods for Clostridium difficile".

P Pancholi, C Kelly, M Raczkowski, J M Balada-Llasat.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23592855      PMCID： PMC3647939          DOI： 10.1128/JCM.00149-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN： 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Rapid and sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for Clostridium difficile detection challenges cytotoxin B cell test and culture as gold standard.

Authors:  Torbjörn Norén; Ingegärd Alriksson; Josefin Andersson; Thomas Akerlund; Magnus Unemo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of the cell culture neutralization, Xpert C. difficile, Xpert C. difficile/Epi, and Illumigene C. difficile assays.

Authors:  P Pancholi; C Kelly; M Raczkowski; J M Balada-Llasat
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Prospective evaluation of the Meridian Illumigene™ loop-mediated amplification assay and the Gen Probe ProGastro™ Cd polymerase chain reaction assay for the direct detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile from fecal samples.

Authors:  Kirk M Doing; Marilyn S Hintz
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Evaluation of Clostridium difficile fecal load and limit of detection during a prospective comparison of two molecular tests, the illumigene C. difficile and Xpert C. difficile/Epi tests.

Authors:  Clare E Gyorke; Susan Wang; Jhansi L Leslie; Stuart H Cohen; Jay V Solnick; Christopher R Polage
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Loop-mediated isothermal amplification compared to real-time PCR and enzyme immunoassay for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection.

Authors:  Bobby L Boyanton; Preethi Sural; Caroline R Loomis; Christine Pesta; Laura Gonzalez-Krellwitz; Barbara Robinson-Dunn; Paul Riska
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of three enzyme immunoassays and a loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  M J Bruins; E Verbeek; J A Wallinga; L E S Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet; E J Kuijper; P Bloembergen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Impact of clinical symptoms on interpretation of diagnostic assays for Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Erik R Dubberke; Zhuolin Han; Linda Bobo; Tiffany Hink; Brenda Lawrence; Susan Copper; Joan Hoppe-Bauer; Carey-Ann D Burnham; William Michael Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Valérie Lalande; Laurence Barrault; Sophie Wadel; Catherine Eckert; Jean-Claude Petit; Frédéric Barbut
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of commercial molecular assays for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection in stools: BD GeneOhm Cdiff, XPert C. difficile and illumigene C. difficile.

Authors:  Céline Viala; Alban Le Monnier; Naouale Maataoui; Clotilde Rousseau; Anne Collignon; Isabelle Poilane
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 2.363
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.