Literature DB >> 19794052

Comparison of a rapid molecular method, the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay, to the most frequently used laboratory tests for detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in diarrheal feces.

Gabriella Terhes1, Edit Urbán, József Sóki, Eniko Nacsa, Elisabeth Nagy.   

Abstract

Six hundred diarrheal stool specimens were collected from inpatients and outpatients at local university hospitals for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile using three parallel methods, the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay, the tissue culture cytotoxicity assay, and a commercially available enzyme-linked fluorescence immunoassay (ELFA) (Vidas C. difficile toxin A and B assay; bioMérieux). Toxigenic C. difficile culture was also performed to further clarify discordant results. During a 3-month study period, 58 (9.7%) of the 600 diarrheal samples examined were positive by the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay, while the Vidas C. difficile toxin A and B assay and the cytotoxicity assay performed directly on stool samples gave 4.7% and 6.3% positivity rates, respectively. In the case of four samples, BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay results were not evaluable at first because of the presence of PCR inhibitors, but upon repeat testing from the frozen lysates, all of these samples proved to be negative. After resolution with toxigenic culture, the cytotoxicity assay proved to be positive in 55 samples (9.2%), while the ELFA was positive in 37 samples (6.2%). Results of culture and repeated cytotoxicity assays emphasized the importance of the culture method, because the use of ELFA or enzyme immunoassay without a culture method may lead to a substantial portion of toxigenic C. difficile strains being missed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19794052      PMCID: PMC2772624          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01133-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  19 in total

1.  Prospective multicenter evaluation of a new immunoassay and real-time PCR for rapid diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Renate J van den Berg; Lesla S Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet; Hendrik-Jan Gerritsen; Hubert P Endtz; Eric R van der Vorm; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Vivian G Loo; Louise Poirier; Mark A Miller; Matthew Oughton; Michael D Libman; Sophie Michaud; Anne-Marie Bourgault; Tuyen Nguyen; Charles Frenette; Mirabelle Kelly; Anne Vibien; Paul Brassard; Susan Fenn; Ken Dewar; Thomas J Hudson; Ruth Horn; Pierre René; Yury Monczak; André Dascal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  L Clifford McDonald; George E Killgore; Angela Thompson; Robert C Owens; Sophia V Kazakova; Susan P Sambol; Stuart Johnson; Dale N Gerding
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Evaluation of real-time PCR and conventional diagnostic methods for the detection of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in a prospective multicentre study.

Authors:  Renate J van den Berg; Norbert Vaessen; Hubert P Endtz; Tanja Schülin; Eric R van der Vorm; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Increasing risk of relapse after treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis in Quebec, Canada.

Authors:  Jacques Pepin; Marie-Eve Alary; Louis Valiquette; Evelyne Raiche; Joannie Ruel; Katalin Fulop; Dominique Godin; Claude Bourassa
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-04-25       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 6.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea: a plea for culture.

Authors:  Michel Delmée; Johan Van Broeck; Anne Simon; Michèle Janssens; Véronique Avesani
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples.

Authors:  Paul D Stamper; Romina Alcabasa; Deborah Aird; Wisal Babiker; Jennifer Wehrlin; Ijeoma Ikpeama; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in stool samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  Lance R Peterson; Rebecca U Manson; Suzanne M Paule; Donna M Hacek; Ari Robicsek; Richard B Thomson; Karen L Kaul
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Comparison of real-time PCR for detection of the tcdC gene with four toxin immunoassays and culture in diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Lynne M Sloan; Brian J Duresko; Daniel R Gustafson; Jon E Rosenblatt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Antimicrobial drugs and community-acquired Clostridium difficile-associated disease, UK.

Authors:  J A Chris Delaney; Sandra Dial; Alan Barkun; Samy Suissa
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John C O'Horo; Amy Jones; Matthew Sternke; Christopher Harper; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Evaluation of a new molecular test, the BD Max Cdiff, for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal samples.

Authors:  Rémi Le Guern; Stéphanie Herwegh; Bruno Grandbastien; René Courcol; Frédéric Wallet
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Rapid and sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for Clostridium difficile detection challenges cytotoxin B cell test and culture as gold standard.

Authors:  Torbjörn Norén; Ingegärd Alriksson; Josefin Andersson; Thomas Akerlund; Magnus Unemo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Modifications of commercial toxigenic Clostridium difficile PCR resulting in improved economy and workflow efficiency.

Authors:  Erik Munson; Dorothy Bilbo; Mary Paul; Maureen Napierala; Jeanne E Hryciuk
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff and Seegene Seeplex ACE PCR assays using toxigenic Clostridium difficile culture for direct detection of tcdB from stool specimens.

Authors:  Bo-Moon Shin; Se Jin Mun; Soo Jin Yoo; Eun Young Kuak
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of a new automated homogeneous PCR assay, GenomEra C. difficile, for rapid detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal specimens.

Authors:  Jari J Hirvonen; Silja Mentula; Suvi-Sirkku Kaukoranta
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Rapid diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by multiplex real-time PCR.

Authors:  F Barbut; M Monot; A Rousseau; S Cavelot; T Simon; B Burghoffer; V Lalande; J Tankovic; J-C Petit; B Dupuy; C Eckert
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Comparison of five assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin.

Authors:  Kimberle C Chapin; Roberta A Dickenson; Fongman Wu; Sarah B Andrea
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 9.  Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease: role in pathogenesis and implications in treatment.

Authors:  Orna Nitzan; Mazen Elias; Bibiana Chazan; Raul Raz; Walid Saliba
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Comparison of ImmunoCard Toxins A&B and the new semiautomated Vidas Clostridium difficile Toxin A&B tests for diagnosis of C. difficile infection.

Authors:  Luis Alcalá; Mercedes Marín; María Madrid; Esther Domínguez-García; Pilar Catalán; María Teresa Peláez; Mar Sánchez-Somolinos; Emilio Bouza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.