Literature DB >> 18977696

Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by toxin detection kits: a systematic review.

Tim Planche1, Adamma Aghaizu, Richard Holliman, Peter Riley, Jan Poloniecki, Aodhán Breathnach, Sanjeev Krishna.   

Abstract

Clostridium difficile can be a fatal hospital-acquired infection and its prevalence has increased. Accurate diagnosis of C difficile is essential for patient management, infection control, and for defining its epidemiology. We did a systematic review of commonly used commercial assays for detection of C difficile toxin (CDT) A and B in stool samples. By comparison of detection of CDT in cell culture with or without selective culture for C difficile, the median sensitivities and specificities (IQR) were as follows: Meridian Premier 0.95 (0.86-0.97) and 0.97 (0.95-0.98), TechLab Tox A/B II 0.83 (0.82-0.85) and 0.99 (0.98-1.00), TechLab Tox A/B Quik Chek 0.84 (0.81-0.87) and 1.00 (0.99-1.00), Remel Xpect 0.82 (0.75-0.89) and 0.96 (0.95-0.98), Meridian Immunocard 0.90 (0.84-0.92) and 0.99 (0.98-1.00), and BioMérieux VIDAS 0.76 and 0.93. If the prevalence of CDT A and B in stool samples is relatively low (<10%), the positive predictive value of these assays is unacceptably low (eg, <50% in some circumstances) and will vary depending on the assay and number of samples tested. This low positive predictive value impinges on clinical management, outbreaks, and makes epidemiological data unreliable. To improve diagnosis, we suggest a two-stage testing strategy for C difficile toxin with an initial highly sensitive rapid screening test to identify positive samples that are then confirmed by a reference method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18977696     DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70233-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis        ISSN: 1473-3099            Impact factor:   25.071


  102 in total

Review 1.  Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John C O'Horo; Amy Jones; Matthew Sternke; Christopher Harper; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Evaluation of a new molecular test, the BD Max Cdiff, for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal samples.

Authors:  Rémi Le Guern; Stéphanie Herwegh; Bruno Grandbastien; René Courcol; Frédéric Wallet
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Glutamate dehydrogenase for laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Simon D Goldenberg; Penny R Cliff; Gary L French
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Diagnostic algorithm using a sensitive broth culture method for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin from stool samples.

Authors:  Paul Bayardelle
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.471

5.  Assessment of Clostridium difficile infections by quantitative detection of tcdB toxin by use of a real-time cell analysis system.

Authors:  Alex B Ryder; Ying Huang; Haijing Li; Min Zheng; Xiaobo Wang; Charles W Stratton; Xiao Xu; Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of diagnostic tests for Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Jonathan Swindells; Nigel Brenwald; Nathan Reading; Beryl Oppenheim
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Clostridium difficile infection: more known than is realised.

Authors:  F J Cooke; E Gkrania-Klotsas
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  A novel subtyping assay for detection of Clostridium difficile virulence genes.

Authors:  Stephanie L Angione; Aartik A Sarma; Aleksey Novikov; Leah Seward; Jennifer H Fieber; Leonard A Mermel; Anubhav Tripathi
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 9.  Pseudomembranous colitis.

Authors:  Priya D Farooq; Nathalie H Urrunaga; Derek M Tang; Erik C von Rosenvinge
Journal:  Dis Mon       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.800

Review 10.  Host response to Clostridium difficile infection: Diagnostics and detection.

Authors:  Elena A Usacheva; Jian-P Jin; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Glob Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.