Literature DB >> 21464534

The reliability of proton-nuclear interaction cross-section data to predict proton-induced PET images in proton therapy.

S España1, X Zhu, J Daartz, G El Fakhri, T Bortfeld, H Paganetti.   

Abstract

In vivo PET range verification relies on the comparison of measured and simulated activity distributions. The accuracy of the simulated distribution depends on the accuracy of the Monte Carlo code, which is in turn dependent on the accuracy of the available cross-section data for β(+) isotope production. We have explored different cross-section data available in the literature for the main reaction channels ((16)O(p,pn)(15)O, (12)C(p,pn)(11)C and (16)O(p,3p3n)(11)C) contributing to the production of β(+) isotopes by proton beams in patients. Available experimental and theoretical values were implemented in the simulation and compared with measured PET images obtained with a high-resolution PET scanner. Each reaction channel was studied independently. A phantom with three different materials was built, two of them with high carbon or oxygen concentration and a third one with average soft tissue composition. Monoenergetic and SOBP field irradiations of the phantom were accomplished and measured PET images were compared with simulation results. Different cross-section values for the tissue-equivalent material lead to range differences below 1 mm when a 5 min scan time was employed and close to 5 mm differences for a 30 min scan time with 15 min delay between irradiation and scan (a typical off-line protocol). The results presented here emphasize the need of more accurate measurement of the cross-section values of the reaction channels contributing to the production of PET isotopes by proton beams before this in vivo range verification method can achieve mm accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21464534      PMCID: PMC3124369          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/9/003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  16 in total

1.  On-line monitoring of radiotherapy beams: experimental results with proton beams.

Authors:  D W Litzenberg; D A Roberts; M Y Lee; K Pham; A M Vander Molen; R Ronningen; F D Becchetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Potential application of PET in quality assurance of proton therapy.

Authors:  K Parodi; W Enghardt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  The modelling of positron emitter production and PET imaging during carbon ion therapy.

Authors:  Falk Pönisch; Katia Parodi; Bernhard G Hasch; Wolfgang Enghardt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A filtering approach based on Gaussian-powerlaw convolutions for local PET verification of proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  Katia Parodi; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  The impact of uncertainties in the CT conversion algorithm when predicting proton beam ranges in patients from dose and PET-activity distributions.

Authors:  Samuel España; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Proton dose monitoring with PET: quantitative studies in Lucite.

Authors:  U Oelfke; G K Lam; M S Atkins
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Proton radiography as a tool for quality control in proton therapy.

Authors:  U Schneider; E Pedroni
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  PET/CT imaging for treatment verification after proton therapy: a study with plastic phantoms and metallic implants.

Authors:  Katia Parodi; Harald Paganetti; Ethan Cascio; Jacob B Flanz; Ali A Bonab; Nathaniel M Alpert; Kevin Lohmann; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Average soft-tissue and bone models for use in radiation dosimetry.

Authors:  D R White; H Q Woodard; S M Hammond
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Patient study of in vivo verification of beam delivery and range, using positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging after proton therapy.

Authors:  Katia Parodi; Harald Paganetti; Helen A Shih; Susan Michaud; Jay S Loeffler; Thomas F DeLaney; Norbert J Liebsch; John E Munzenrider; Alan J Fischman; Antje Knopf; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  15 in total

1.  Monitoring proton therapy with PET.

Authors:  H Paganetti; G El Fakhri
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Monitoring proton radiation therapy with in-room PET imaging.

Authors:  Xuping Zhu; Samuel España; Juliane Daartz; Norbert Liebsch; Jinsong Ouyang; Harald Paganetti; Thomas R Bortfeld; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Feasibility study of using fall-off gradients of early and late PET scans for proton range verification.

Authors:  Jongmin Cho; Kira Grogg; Chul Hee Min; Xuping Zhu; Harald Paganetti; Hyun Cheol Lee; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Mapping (15)O production rate for proton therapy verification.

Authors:  Kira Grogg; Nathaniel M Alpert; Xuping Zhu; Chul Hee Min; Mauro Testa; Brian Winey; Marc D Normandin; Helen A Shih; Harald Paganetti; Thomas Bortfeld; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Feasibility of proton-activated implantable markers for proton range verification using PET.

Authors:  Jongmin Cho; Geoffrey Ibbott; Michael Gillin; Carlos Gonzalez-Lepera; Uwe Titt; Harald Paganetti; Matthew Kerr; Osama Mawlawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Feasibility of Using Distal Endpoints for In-room PET Range Verification of Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Kira Grogg; Xuping Zhu; Chul Hee Min; Brian Winey; Thomas Bortfeld; Harald Paganetti; Helen A Shih; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.679

7.  Determination of elemental tissue composition following proton treatment using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Jongmin Cho; Geoffrey Ibbott; Michael Gillin; Carlos Gonzalez-Lepera; Chul Hee Min; Xuping Zhu; Georges El Fakhri; Harald Paganetti; Osama Mawlawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Clinical application of in-room positron emission tomography for in vivo treatment monitoring in proton radiation therapy.

Authors:  Chul Hee Min; Xuping Zhu; Brian A Winey; Kira Grogg; Mauro Testa; Georges El Fakhri; Thomas R Bortfeld; Harald Paganetti; Helen A Shih
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Monte Carlo methods for device simulations in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hyojun Park; Harald Paganetti; Jan Schuemann; Xun Jia; Chul Hee Min
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.174

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.