Literature DB >> 21098912

The impact of uncertainties in the CT conversion algorithm when predicting proton beam ranges in patients from dose and PET-activity distributions.

Samuel España1, Harald Paganetti.   

Abstract

The advantages of a finite range of proton beams can only be partly exploited in radiation therapy unless the range can be predicted in patient anatomy with <2 mm accuracy (for non-moving targets). Monte Carlo dose calculation aims at 1-2 mm accuracy in dose prediction, and proton-induced PET imaging aims at ∼2 mm accuracy in range verification. The latter is done using Monte Carlo predicted PET images. Monte Carlo methods are based on CT images to describe patient anatomy. The dose calculation algorithm and the CT resolution/artifacts might affect dose calculation accuracy. Additionally, when using Monte Carlo for PET range verification, the biological decay model and the cross sections for positron emitter production affect predicted PET images. The goal of this work is to study the effect of uncertainties in the CT conversion on the proton beam range predicted by Monte Carlo dose calculations and proton-induced PET signals. Conversion schemes to assign density and elemental composition based on a CT image of the patient define a unique Hounsfield unit (HU) to tissue parameters relationship. Uncertainties are introduced because there is no unique relationship between HU and tissue parameters. In this work, different conversion schemes based on a stoichiometric calibration method as well as different numbers of tissue bins were considered in three head and neck patients. For Monte Carlo dose calculation, the results show close to zero (<0.5 mm) differences in range using different conversion schemes. Further, a reduction of the number of bins used to define individual tissues down to 13 did not affect the accuracy. In the case of simulated PET images we found a more pronounced sensitivity on the CT conversion scheme with a mean fall-off position variation of about 1 mm. We conclude that proton dose distributions based on Monte Carlo calculation are only slightly affected by the uncertainty on density and elemental composition introduced by unique assignment to each HU if a stoichiometric calibration is used. Calculated PET images used for range verification are more sensitive to conversion uncertainties causing an intrinsic limitation due to CT conversion alone of at least 1 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21098912     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/24/011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  20 in total

1.  Proton dose calculation on scatter-corrected CBCT image: Feasibility study for adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Yang-Kyun Park; Gregory C Sharp; Justin Phillips; Brian A Winey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy.

Authors:  S E McGowan; N G Burnet; A J Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Tissue decomposition from dual energy CT data for MC based dose calculation in particle therapy.

Authors:  Nora Hünemohr; Harald Paganetti; Steffen Greilich; Oliver Jäkel; Joao Seco
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Proton tracking for medical imaging and dosimetry.

Authors:  J T Taylor; P P Allport; G L Casse; N A Smith; I Tsurin; N M Allinson; M Esposito; A Kacperek; J Nieto-Camero; T Price; C Waltham
Journal:  J Instrum       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 1.415

5.  Mapping (15)O production rate for proton therapy verification.

Authors:  Kira Grogg; Nathaniel M Alpert; Xuping Zhu; Chul Hee Min; Mauro Testa; Brian Winey; Marc D Normandin; Helen A Shih; Harald Paganetti; Thomas Bortfeld; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Development of a high resolution voxelised head phantom for medical physics applications.

Authors:  V Giacometti; S Guatelli; M Bazalova-Carter; A B Rosenfeld; R W Schulte
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  New developments in treatment planning and verification of particle beam therapy.

Authors:  Reinhard W Schulte; Andrew J Wroe
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 1.241

8.  Site-specific range uncertainties caused by dose calculation algorithms for proton therapy.

Authors:  J Schuemann; S Dowdell; C Grassberger; C H Min; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  The clinical impact of uncertainties in the mean excitation energy of human tissues during proton therapy.

Authors:  Abigail Besemer; Harald Paganetti; Bryan Bednarz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Determination of elemental tissue composition following proton treatment using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Jongmin Cho; Geoffrey Ibbott; Michael Gillin; Carlos Gonzalez-Lepera; Chul Hee Min; Xuping Zhu; Georges El Fakhri; Harald Paganetti; Osama Mawlawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.