Literature DB >> 21677366

Monitoring proton radiation therapy with in-room PET imaging.

Xuping Zhu1, Samuel España, Juliane Daartz, Norbert Liebsch, Jinsong Ouyang, Harald Paganetti, Thomas R Bortfeld, Georges El Fakhri.   

Abstract

We used a mobile positron emission tomography (PET) scanner positioned within the proton therapy treatment room to study the feasibility of proton range verification with an in-room, stand-alone PET system, and compared with off-line equivalent studies. Two subjects with adenoid cystic carcinoma were enrolled into a pilot study in which in-room PET scans were acquired in list-mode after a routine fractionated treatment session. The list-mode PET data were reconstructed with different time schemes to generate in-room short, in-room long and off-line equivalent (by skipping coincidences from the first 15 min during the list-mode reconstruction) PET images for comparison in activity distribution patterns. A phantom study was followed to evaluate the accuracy of range verification for different reconstruction time schemes quantitatively. The in-room PET has a higher sensitivity compared to the off-line modality so that the PET acquisition time can be greatly reduced from 30 to <5 min. Features in deep-site, soft-tissue regions were better retained with in-room short PET acquisitions because of the collection of (15)O component and lower biological washout. For soft tissue-equivalent material, the distal fall-off edge of an in-room short acquisition is deeper compared to an off-line equivalent scan, indicating a better coverage of the high-dose end of the beam. In-room PET is a promising low cost, high sensitivity modality for the in vivo verification of proton therapy. Better accuracy in Monte Carlo predictions, especially for biological decay modeling, is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21677366      PMCID: PMC3141290          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/13/019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  14 in total

1.  Correlation between CT numbers and tissue parameters needed for Monte Carlo simulations of clinical dose distributions.

Authors:  W Schneider; T Bortfeld; W Schlegel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Potential application of PET in quality assurance of proton therapy.

Authors:  K Parodi; W Enghardt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Dose quantification from in-beam positron emission tomography.

Authors:  W Enghardt; K Parodi; P Crespo; F Fiedler; J Pawelke; F Pönisch
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Comparison between in-beam and offline positron emission tomography imaging of proton and carbon ion therapeutic irradiation at synchrotron- and cyclotron-based facilities.

Authors:  Katia Parodi; Thomas Bortfeld; Thomas Haberer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  PET/CT imaging for treatment verification after proton therapy: a study with plastic phantoms and metallic implants.

Authors:  Katia Parodi; Harald Paganetti; Ethan Cascio; Jacob B Flanz; Ali A Bonab; Nathaniel M Alpert; Kevin Lohmann; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  The reliability of proton-nuclear interaction cross-section data to predict proton-induced PET images in proton therapy.

Authors:  S España; X Zhu; J Daartz; G El Fakhri; T Bortfeld; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Hongyu Jiang; Katia Parodi; Roelf Slopsema; Martijn Engelsman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Quantitative assessment of the physical potential of proton beam range verification with PET/CT.

Authors:  A Knopf; K Parodi; H Paganetti; E Cascio; A Bonab; T Bortfeld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Washout measurement of radioisotope implanted by radioactive beams in the rabbit.

Authors:  H Mizuno; T Tomitani; M Kanazawa; A Kitagawa; J Pawelke; Y Iseki; E Urakabe; M Suda; A Kawano; R Iritani; S Matsushita; T Inaniwa; T Nishio; S Furukawa; K Ando; Y K Nakamura; T Kanai; K Ishii
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Patient study of in vivo verification of beam delivery and range, using positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging after proton therapy.

Authors:  Katia Parodi; Harald Paganetti; Helen A Shih; Susan Michaud; Jay S Loeffler; Thomas F DeLaney; Norbert J Liebsch; John E Munzenrider; Alan J Fischman; Antje Knopf; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  25 in total

1.  Monitoring proton therapy with PET.

Authors:  H Paganetti; G El Fakhri
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  INSIDE in-beam positron emission tomography system for particle range monitoring in hadrontherapy.

Authors:  Maria Giuseppina Bisogni; Andrea Attili; Giuseppe Battistoni; Nicola Belcari; Niccolo' Camarlinghi; Piergiorgio Cerello; Silvia Coli; Alberto Del Guerra; Alfredo Ferrari; Veronica Ferrero; Elisa Fiorina; Giuseppe Giraudo; Eleftheria Kostara; Matteo Morrocchi; Francesco Pennazio; Cristiana Peroni; Maria Antonietta Piliero; Giovanni Pirrone; Angelo Rivetti; Manuel D Rolo; Valeria Rosso; Paola Sala; Giancarlo Sportelli; Richard Wheadon
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-12-02

Review 3.  Update on novel trends in PET/CT technology and its clinical applications.

Authors:  Stephan Walrand; Michel Hesse; François Jamar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Image guidance in proton therapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Miao Zhang; Wei Zou; Boon-Keng Kevin Teo
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04

5.  Feasibility study of using fall-off gradients of early and late PET scans for proton range verification.

Authors:  Jongmin Cho; Kira Grogg; Chul Hee Min; Xuping Zhu; Harald Paganetti; Hyun Cheol Lee; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  In vivo range verification in particle therapy.

Authors:  Katia Parodi; Jerimy C Polf
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Mapping (15)O production rate for proton therapy verification.

Authors:  Kira Grogg; Nathaniel M Alpert; Xuping Zhu; Chul Hee Min; Mauro Testa; Brian Winey; Marc D Normandin; Helen A Shih; Harald Paganetti; Thomas Bortfeld; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Feasibility of proton-activated implantable markers for proton range verification using PET.

Authors:  Jongmin Cho; Geoffrey Ibbott; Michael Gillin; Carlos Gonzalez-Lepera; Uwe Titt; Harald Paganetti; Matthew Kerr; Osama Mawlawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Feasibility of Using Distal Endpoints for In-room PET Range Verification of Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Kira Grogg; Xuping Zhu; Chul Hee Min; Brian Winey; Thomas Bortfeld; Harald Paganetti; Helen A Shih; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.679

10.  Determination of elemental tissue composition following proton treatment using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Jongmin Cho; Geoffrey Ibbott; Michael Gillin; Carlos Gonzalez-Lepera; Chul Hee Min; Xuping Zhu; Georges El Fakhri; Harald Paganetti; Osama Mawlawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.