Literature DB >> 25817530

Mapping (15)O production rate for proton therapy verification.

Kira Grogg1, Nathaniel M Alpert1, Xuping Zhu1, Chul Hee Min2, Mauro Testa3, Brian Winey3, Marc D Normandin1, Helen A Shih3, Harald Paganetti3, Thomas Bortfeld3, Georges El Fakhri4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This work was a proof-of-principle study for the evaluation of oxygen-15 ((15)O) production as an imaging target through the use of positron emission tomography (PET), to improve verification of proton treatment plans and to study the effects of perfusion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dynamic PET measurements of irradiation-produced isotopes were made for a phantom and rabbit thigh muscles. The rabbit muscle was irradiated and imaged under both live and dead conditions. A differential equation was fitted to phantom and in vivo data, yielding estimates of (15)O production and clearance rates, which were compared to live versus dead rates for the rabbit and to Monte Carlo predictions.
RESULTS: PET clearance rates agreed with decay constants of the dominant radionuclide species in 3 different phantom materials. In 2 oxygen-rich materials, the ratio of (15)O production rates agreed with the expected ratio. In the dead rabbit thighs, the dynamic PET concentration histories were accurately described using (15)O decay constant, whereas the live thigh activity decayed faster. Most importantly, the (15)O production rates agreed within 2% (P>.5) between conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: We developed a new method for quantitative measurement of (15)O production and clearance rates in the period immediately following proton therapy. Measurements in the phantom and rabbits were well described in terms of (15)O production and clearance rates, plus a correction for other isotopes. These proof-of-principle results support the feasibility of detailed verification of proton therapy treatment delivery. In addition, (15)O clearance rates may be useful in monitoring permeability changes due to therapy.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25817530      PMCID: PMC4431894          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  22 in total

1.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.

Authors:  K J Worsley; S Marrett; P Neelin; A C Vandal; K J Friston; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Dose quantification from in-beam positron emission tomography.

Authors:  W Enghardt; K Parodi; P Crespo; F Fiedler; J Pawelke; F Pönisch
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Measurement and verification of positron emitter nuclei generated at each treatment site by target nuclear fragment reactions in proton therapy.

Authors:  Aya Miyatake; Teiji Nishio; Takashi Ogino; Nagahiro Saijo; Hiroyasu Esumi; Mitsuru Uesaka
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications.

Authors:  J Perl; J Shin; J Schumann; B Faddegon; H Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Monitoring proton radiation therapy with in-room PET imaging.

Authors:  Xuping Zhu; Samuel España; Juliane Daartz; Norbert Liebsch; Jinsong Ouyang; Harald Paganetti; Thomas R Bortfeld; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  On the effectiveness of ion range determination from in-beam PET data.

Authors:  Fine Fiedler; Georgy Shakirin; Judith Skowron; Henning Braess; Paulo Crespo; Daniela Kunath; Jörg Pawelke; Falk Pönisch; Wolfgang Enghardt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  The reliability of proton-nuclear interaction cross-section data to predict proton-induced PET images in proton therapy.

Authors:  S España; X Zhu; J Daartz; G El Fakhri; T Bortfeld; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  In vivo verification of proton beam path by using post-treatment PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  Wen C Hsi; Daniel J Indelicato; Carlos Vargas; Srividya Duvvuri; Zuofeng Li; Jatinder Palta
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Washout measurement of radioisotope implanted by radioactive beams in the rabbit.

Authors:  H Mizuno; T Tomitani; M Kanazawa; A Kitagawa; J Pawelke; Y Iseki; E Urakabe; M Suda; A Kawano; R Iritani; S Matsushita; T Inaniwa; T Nishio; S Furukawa; K Ando; Y K Nakamura; T Kanai; K Ishii
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  4 in total

1.  Monitoring proton therapy with PET.

Authors:  H Paganetti; G El Fakhri
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Feasibility study of using fall-off gradients of early and late PET scans for proton range verification.

Authors:  Jongmin Cho; Kira Grogg; Chul Hee Min; Xuping Zhu; Harald Paganetti; Hyun Cheol Lee; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Pablo Botas; Gregory C Sharp; Brian Winey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A proof-of-concept study of an in-situ partial-ring time-of-flight PET scanner for proton beam verification.

Authors:  Srilalan Krishnamoorthy; Boon-Keng K Teo; Wei Zou; James McDonough; Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-12-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.