Literature DB >> 16585841

A filtering approach based on Gaussian-powerlaw convolutions for local PET verification of proton radiotherapy.

Katia Parodi1, Thomas Bortfeld.   

Abstract

Because proton beams activate positron emitters in patients, positron emission tomography (PET) has the potential to play a unique role in the in vivo verification of proton radiotherapy. Unfortunately, the PET image is not directly proportional to the delivered radiation dose distribution. Current treatment verification strategies using PET therefore compare the actual PET image with full-blown Monte Carlo simulations of the PET signal. In this paper, we describe a simpler and more direct way to reconstruct the expected PET signal from the local radiation dose distribution near the distal fall-off region, which is calculated by the treatment planning programme. Under reasonable assumptions, the PET image can be described as a convolution of the dose distribution with a filter function. We develop a formalism to derive the filter function analytically. The main concept is the introduction of 'Q' functions defined as the convolution of a Gaussian with a powerlaw function. Special Q functions are the Gaussian itself and the error function. The convolution of two Q functions is another Q function. By fitting elementary dose distributions and their corresponding PET signals with Q functions, we derive the Q function approximation of the filter. The new filtering method has been validated through comparisons with Monte Carlo calculations and, in one case, with measured data. While the basic concept is developed under idealized conditions assuming that the absorbing medium is homogeneous near the distal fall-off region, a generalization to inhomogeneous situations is also described. As a result, the method can determine the distal fall-off region of the PET signal, and consequently the range of the proton beam, with millimetre accuracy. Quantification of the produced activity is possible. In conclusion, the PET activity resulting from a proton beam treatment can be determined by locally filtering the dose distribution as obtained from the treatment planning system. The filter function can be calculated analytically using convolutions of Gaussians and powerlaw functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16585841     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/8/003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  18 in total

1.  PET/CT in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Liselotte Højgaard; Lena Specht
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Radiotherapy treatment of early-stage prostate cancer with IMRT and protons: a treatment planning comparison.

Authors:  Alexei Trofimov; Paul L Nguyen; John J Coen; Karen P Doppke; Robert J Schneider; Judith A Adams; Thomas R Bortfeld; Anthony L Zietman; Thomas F Delaney; William U Shipley
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Proton therapy dosimetry using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Matthew T Studenski; Ying Xiao
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-04-28

4.  PET/CT imaging for treatment verification after proton therapy: a study with plastic phantoms and metallic implants.

Authors:  Katia Parodi; Harald Paganetti; Ethan Cascio; Jacob B Flanz; Ali A Bonab; Nathaniel M Alpert; Kevin Lohmann; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  The reliability of proton-nuclear interaction cross-section data to predict proton-induced PET images in proton therapy.

Authors:  S España; X Zhu; J Daartz; G El Fakhri; T Bortfeld; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Feasibility of Using Distal Endpoints for In-room PET Range Verification of Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Kira Grogg; Xuping Zhu; Chul Hee Min; Brian Winey; Thomas Bortfeld; Harald Paganetti; Helen A Shih; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.679

7.  The rationale for intensity-modulated proton therapy in geometrically challenging cases.

Authors:  S Safai; A Trofimov; J A Adams; M Engelsman; T Bortfeld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Latest developments in in-vivo imaging for proton therapy.

Authors:  Katia Parodi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Patient study of in vivo verification of beam delivery and range, using positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging after proton therapy.

Authors:  Katia Parodi; Harald Paganetti; Helen A Shih; Susan Michaud; Jay S Loeffler; Thomas F DeLaney; Norbert J Liebsch; John E Munzenrider; Alan J Fischman; Antje Knopf; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  Range Verification Methods in Particle Therapy: Underlying Physics and Monte Carlo Modeling.

Authors:  Aafke Christine Kraan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.