Literature DB >> 24464031

Feasibility of Using Distal Endpoints for In-room PET Range Verification of Proton Therapy.

Kira Grogg1, Xuping Zhu1, Chul Hee Min2, Brian Winey3, Thomas Bortfeld3, Harald Paganetti3, Helen A Shih3, Georges El Fakhri1.   

Abstract

In an effort to verify the dose delivery in proton therapy, Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scans have been employed to measure the distribution of β+ radioactivity produced from nuclear reactions of the protons with native nuclei. Because the dose and PET distributions are difficult to compare directly, the range verification is currently carried out by comparing measured and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation predicted PET distributions. In order to reduce the reliance on MC, simulated PET (simPET) and dose distal endpoints were compared to explore the feasibility of using distal endpoints for in-room PET range verification. MC simulations were generated for six head and neck patients with corrections for radiological decay, biological washout, and PET resolution. One-dimensional profiles of the dose and simPET were examined along the direction of the beam and covering the cross section of the beam. The chosen endpoints of the simPET (x-intercept of the linear fit to the distal falloff) and planned dose (20-50% of maximum dose) correspond to where most of the protons are below the threshold energy for the nuclear reactions. The difference in endpoint range between the distal surfaces of the dose and MC-PET were compared and the spread of range differences were assessed. Among the six patients, the mean difference between MC-PET and dose depth was found to be -1.6 mm to +0.5 mm between patients, with a standard deviation of 1.1 to 4.0 mm across the individual beams. In clinical practice, regions with deviations beyond the safety margin need to be examined more closely and can potentially lead to adjustments to the treatment plan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Index Terms; PET; hadron therapy; proton beams

Year:  2013        PMID: 24464031      PMCID: PMC3900284          DOI: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2012.6551892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci        ISSN: 0018-9499            Impact factor:   1.679


  27 in total

1.  On the feasibility of automatic detection of range deviations from in-beam PET data.

Authors:  S Helmbrecht; A Santiago; W Enghardt; P Kuess; F Fiedler
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Monte Carlo calculations of positron emitter yields in proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  E Seravalli; C Robert; J Bauer; F Stichelbaut; C Kurz; J Smeets; C Van Ngoc Ty; D R Schaart; I Buvat; K Parodi; F Verhaegen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Implementation and workflow for PET monitoring of therapeutic ion irradiation: a comparison of in-beam, in-room, and off-line techniques.

Authors:  Georgy Shakirin; Henning Braess; Fine Fiedler; Daniela Kunath; Kristin Laube; Katia Parodi; Marlen Priegnitz; Wolfgang Enghardt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Monitoring proton radiation therapy with in-room PET imaging.

Authors:  Xuping Zhu; Samuel España; Juliane Daartz; Norbert Liebsch; Jinsong Ouyang; Harald Paganetti; Thomas R Bortfeld; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Monte Carlo patient study on the comparison of prompt gamma and PET imaging for range verification in proton therapy.

Authors:  M Moteabbed; S España; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  On the effectiveness of ion range determination from in-beam PET data.

Authors:  Fine Fiedler; Georgy Shakirin; Judith Skowron; Henning Braess; Paulo Crespo; Daniela Kunath; Jörg Pawelke; Falk Pönisch; Wolfgang Enghardt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Using statistical measures for automated comparison of in-beam PET data.

Authors:  Peter Kuess; Wolfgang Birkfellner; Wolfgang Enghardt; Stephan Helmbrecht; Fine Fiedler; Dietmar Georg
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Feasibility of Using Distal Endpoints for In-room PET Range Verification of Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Kira Grogg; Xuping Zhu; Chul Hee Min; Brian Winey; Thomas Bortfeld; Harald Paganetti; Helen A Shih; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.679

9.  Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations.

Authors:  Magdalena Bazalova; Jean-François Carrier; Luc Beaulieu; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Washout measurement of radioisotope implanted by radioactive beams in the rabbit.

Authors:  H Mizuno; T Tomitani; M Kanazawa; A Kitagawa; J Pawelke; Y Iseki; E Urakabe; M Suda; A Kawano; R Iritani; S Matsushita; T Inaniwa; T Nishio; S Furukawa; K Ando; Y K Nakamura; T Kanai; K Ishii
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  2 in total

1.  A proof-of-concept study of an in-situ partial-ring time-of-flight PET scanner for proton beam verification.

Authors:  Srilalan Krishnamoorthy; Boon-Keng K Teo; Wei Zou; James McDonough; Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-12-14

2.  Feasibility of Using Distal Endpoints for In-room PET Range Verification of Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Kira Grogg; Xuping Zhu; Chul Hee Min; Brian Winey; Thomas Bortfeld; Harald Paganetti; Helen A Shih; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.679

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.