Literature DB >> 21453214

Radiation exposure from imaging tests: is there an increased cancer risk?

Patricia K Nguyen1, Joseph C Wu.   

Abstract

The increasing exposure to low-dose radiation from diagnostic testing has prompted renewed interest in evaluating its carcinogenic risk, but quantifying health risk from low-dose radiation exposure remains controversial. The current approach is to adopt the linear non-threshold model, which is commonly applied to high-dose exposure, and apply it to assess risk from low-dose exposure. However, existing data are conflicting and limited to epidemiological studies and/or in vitro analyses. In this article, we will discuss the potential cancer risk from low- and high-dose radiation, their effects on DNA repair response pathways, and the best course of action for patients and providers to minimize risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21453214      PMCID: PMC3102578          DOI: 10.1586/erc.10.184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther        ISSN: 1477-9072


  57 in total

1.  Estimates of lifetime attributable risk of cancer after a single radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography.

Authors:  F F Faletra; I D'Angeli; C Klersy; M Averaimo; J Klimusina; E Pasotti; G B Pedrazzini; M Curti; C Carraro; R Diliberto; T Moccetti; A Auricchio
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology endorsed by the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Ralph G Brindis; Pamela S Douglas; Robert C Hendel; Eric D Peterson; Michael J Wolk; Joseph M Allen; Manesh R Patel; Ira E Raskin; Robert C Hendel; Timothy M Bateman; Manuel D Cerqueira; Raymond J Gibbons; Linda D Gillam; John A Gillespie; Robert C Hendel; Ami E Iskandrian; Scott D Jerome; Harlan M Krumholz; Joseph V Messer; John A Spertus; Stephen A Stowers
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

4.  DNA double-strand break repair of blood lymphocytes and normal tissues analysed in a preclinical mouse model: implications for radiosensitivity testing.

Authors:  Claudia E Rübe; Saskia Grudzenski; Martin Kühne; Xiaorong Dong; Nicole Rief; Markus Löbrich; Christian Rübe
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation.

Authors:  Leon Mullenders; Mike Atkinson; Herwig Paretzke; Laure Sabatier; Simon Bouffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The nonhomologous end joining factor Artemis suppresses multi-tissue tumor formation and prevents loss of heterozygosity.

Authors:  Y Woo; S M Wright; S A Maas; T L Alley; L B Caddle; S Kamdar; J Affourtit; O Foreman; E C Akeson; D Shaffer; R T Bronson; H C Morse; D Roopenian; K D Mills
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 8.  Radioadaptive response revisited.

Authors:  Soile Tapio; Vesna Jacob
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Effect of padding duration on radiation dose and image interpretation in prospectively ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Troy M Labounty; Jonathon Leipsic; James K Min; Brett Heilbron; G B John Mancini; Fay Y Lin; James P Earls
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  In vivo mutagenic effect of very low dose radiation.

Authors:  Pamela J Sykes; Tanya K Day; Sarah J Swinburne; Joanne M Lane; Alexander A Morley; Antony M Hooker; Madhava Bhat
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 2.658

View more
  16 in total

1.  Striking a balance in the discussion of the benefits of imaging tests and risks of radiation exposure.

Authors:  Randall C Thompson; Prem Soman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Alternative medicine techniques have non-linear effects on radiation response and can alter the expression of radiation induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Richard Smith; Matthew Henry; Colin Seymour; Raimond Wong
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Deep learning-based image quality improvement for low-dose computed tomography simulation in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Zhen Tian; Xue Dong; Yingzi Liu; Xiaojun Jiang; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Hui-Kuo Shu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-10-24

4.  Beliefs and attitudes about lung cancer screening among smokers.

Authors:  Sirisha Jonnalagadda; Cara Bergamo; Jenny J Lin; Linda Lurslurchachai; Michael Diefenbach; Cardinale Smith; Judith E Nelson; Juan P Wisnivesky
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.705

5.  Prevalence and Correlates of Worry About Medical Imaging Radiation Among United States Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Raymond E Baser; Joy S Westerman; Jennifer S Ford
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2018-10

6.  The preference for error-free or error-prone postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to low-dose methyl methanesulfonate is cell cycle dependent.

Authors:  Dongqing Huang; Brian D Piening; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Radiolabeled Duramycin: Promising Translational Imaging of Myocardial Apoptosis.

Authors:  Joseph C Wu; Xulei Qin; Evgenios Neofytou
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-02-14

8.  DNA double-strand breaks in blood lymphocytes induced by two-day 99mTc-MIBI myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.

Authors:  Matthias Rief; Lisa Hartmann; Dominik Geisel; Felicitas Richter; Winfried Brenner; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  An evaluation of DNA double strand break formation and excreted guanine species post whole body PET/CT procedure.

Authors:  Tanmoy Mondal; Amit Nautiyal; Somiranjan Ghosh; Christopher A Loffredo; Deepanjan Mitra; Chabita Saha; Subrata Kumar Dey
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Identification of genetic loci that control mammary tumor susceptibility through the host microenvironment.

Authors:  Pengju Zhang; Alvin Lo; Yurong Huang; Ge Huang; Guozhou Liang; Joni Mott; Gary H Karpen; Eleanor A Blakely; Mina J Bissell; Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff; Antoine M Snijders; Jian-Hua Mao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.