Literature DB >> 18927295

DNA double-strand break repair of blood lymphocytes and normal tissues analysed in a preclinical mouse model: implications for radiosensitivity testing.

Claudia E Rübe1, Saskia Grudzenski, Martin Kühne, Xiaorong Dong, Nicole Rief, Markus Löbrich, Christian Rübe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy is an effective cancer treatment, but a few patients suffer severe radiation toxicities in neighboring normal tissues. There is increasing evidence that the variable susceptibility to radiation toxicities is caused by the individual genetic predisposition, by subtle mutations, or polymorphisms in genes involved in cellular responses to ionizing radiation. Double-strand breaks (DSB) are the most deleterious form of radiation-induced DNA damage, and DSB repair deficiencies lead to pronounced radiosensitivity. Using a preclinical mouse model, the highly sensitive gammaH2AX-foci approach was tested to verify even subtle, genetically determined DSB repair deficiencies known to be associated with increased normal tissue radiosensitivity. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: By enumerating gammaH2AX-foci in blood lymphocytes and normal tissues (brain, lung, heart, and intestine), the induction and repair of DSBs after irradiation with therapeutic doses (0.1-2 Gy) was investigated in repair-proficient and repair-deficient mouse strains in vivo and blood samples irradiated ex vivo.
RESULTS: gammaH2AX-foci analysis allowed to verify the different DSB repair deficiencies; even slight impairments caused by single polymorphisms were detected similarly in both blood lymphocytes and solid tissues, indicating that DSB repair measured in lymphocytes is valid for different and complex organs. Moreover, gammaH2AX-foci analysis of blood samples irradiated ex vivo was found to reflect repair kinetics measured in vivo and, thus, give reliable information about the individual DSB repair capacity.
CONCLUSIONS: gammaH2AX analysis of blood and tissue samples allows to detect even minor genetically defined DSB repair deficiencies, affecting normal tissue radiosensitivity. Future studies will have to evaluate the clinical potential to identify patients more susceptible to radiation toxicities before radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18927295     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  62 in total

1.  The brain microenvironment preferentially enhances the radioresistance of CD133(+) glioblastoma stem-like cells.

Authors:  Muhammad Jamal; Barbara H Rath; Patricia S Tsang; Kevin Camphausen; Philip J Tofilon
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Effect of CT scan protocols on x-ray-induced DNA double-strand breaks in blood lymphocytes of patients undergoing coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  M A Kuefner; S Grudzenski; J Hamann; S Achenbach; Michael Lell; K Anders; S A Schwab; L Häberle; M Löbrich; M Uder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Excitotoxic and Radiation Stress Increase TERT Levels in the Mitochondria and Cytosol of Cerebellar Purkinje Neurons.

Authors:  Erez Eitan; Carmel Braverman; Ailone Tichon; Daniel Gitler; Emmette R Hutchison; Mark P Mattson; Esther Priel
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Direct measurement of the 3-dimensional DNA lesion distribution induced by energetic charged particles in a mouse model tissue.

Authors:  Johanna Mirsch; Francesco Tommasino; Antonia Frohns; Sandro Conrad; Marco Durante; Michael Scholz; Thomas Friedrich; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Hypothermia postpones DNA damage repair in irradiated cells and protects against cell killing.

Authors:  Brandon J Baird; Jennifer S Dickey; Asako J Nakamura; Christophe E Redon; Palak Parekh; Yuri V Griko; Khaled Aziz; Alexandros G Georgakilas; William M Bonner; Olga A Martin
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Microenvironmental regulation of glioblastoma radioresponse.

Authors:  Muhammad Jamal; Barbara H Rath; Eli S Williams; Kevin Camphausen; Philip J Tofilon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation.

Authors:  Leon Mullenders; Mike Atkinson; Herwig Paretzke; Laure Sabatier; Simon Bouffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  PET imaging of DNA damage using (89)Zr-labelled anti-γH2AX-TAT immunoconjugates.

Authors:  James C Knight; Caitríona Topping; Michael Mosley; Veerle Kersemans; Nadia Falzone; José M Fernández-Varea; Bart Cornelissen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  [Prediction of the reaction of normal tissue and tumor cells to radiotherapy].

Authors:  E Dikomey; J Dahm-Daphi; L Distel
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 10.  Deoxyribonucleic acid damage-associated biomarkers of ionising radiation: current status and future relevance for radiology and radiotherapy.

Authors:  G Manning; K Rothkamm
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.