Literature DB >> 23382077

The preference for error-free or error-prone postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to low-dose methyl methanesulfonate is cell cycle dependent.

Dongqing Huang1, Brian D Piening, Amanda G Paulovich.   

Abstract

Cells employ error-free or error-prone postreplication repair (PRR) processes to tolerate DNA damage. Here, we present a genome-wide screen for sensitivity to 0.001% methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). This relatively low dose is of particular interest because wild-type cells exhibit no discernible phenotypes in response to treatment, yet PRR mutants are unique among repair mutants in their exquisite sensitivity to 0.001% MMS; thus, low-dose MMS treatment provides a distinctive opportunity to study postreplication repair processes. We show that upon exposure to low-dose MMS, a PRR-defective rad18Δ mutant stalls into a lengthy G2 arrest associated with the accumulation of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps. Consistent with previous results following UV-induced damage, reactivation of Rad18, even after prolonged G2 arrest, restores viability and genome integrity. We further show that PRR pathway preference in 0.001% MMS depends on timing and context; cells preferentially employ the error-free pathway in S phase and do not require MEC1-dependent checkpoint activation for survival. However, when PRR is restricted to the G2 phase, cells utilize REV3-dependent translesion synthesis, which requires a MEC1-dependent delay and results in significant hypermutability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23382077      PMCID: PMC3624245          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01392-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  56 in total

1.  Widespread aneuploidy revealed by DNA microarray expression profiling.

Authors:  T R Hughes; C J Roberts; H Dai; A R Jones; M R Meyer; D Slade; J Burchard; S Dow; T R Ward; M J Kidd; S H Friend; M J Marton
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Synthetic genetic array analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Amy Hin Yan Tong; Charles Boone
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2006

3.  The critical mutagenic translesion DNA polymerase Rev1 is highly expressed during G(2)/M phase rather than S phase.

Authors:  Lauren S Waters; Graham C Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions.

Authors:  Massimo Lopes; Marco Foiani; José M Sogo
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase.

Authors:  Boris Pfander; George-Lucian Moldovan; Meik Sacher; Carsten Hoege; Stefan Jentsch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The error-free component of the RAD6/RAD18 DNA damage tolerance pathway of budding yeast employs sister-strand recombination.

Authors:  Hengshan Zhang; Christopher W Lawrence
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  DNA postreplication repair and mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  S Broomfield; T Hryciw; W Xiao
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2001-08-09       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase.

Authors:  A Pellicioli; C Lucca; G Liberi; F Marini; M Lopes; P Plevani; A Romano; P P Di Fiore; M Foiani
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Dental x-rays and risk of meningioma.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Claus; Lisa Calvocoressi; Melissa L Bondy; Joellen M Schildkraut; Joseph L Wiemels; Margaret Wrensch
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M S Longtine; A McKenzie; D J Demarini; N G Shah; A Wach; A Brachat; P Philippsen; J R Pringle
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.239

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Replicating damaged DNA in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Nimrat Chatterjee; Wolfram Siede
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Shared genetic pathways contribute to the tolerance of endogenous and low-dose exogenous DNA damage in yeast.

Authors:  Kevin Lehner; Sue Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The NuA4 complex promotes translesion synthesis (TLS)-mediated DNA damage tolerance.

Authors:  Margaret Renaud-Young; David C Lloyd; Kate Chatfield-Reed; Iain George; Gordon Chua; Jennifer Cobb
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The DNA damage response acts as a safeguard against harmful DNA-RNA hybrids of different origins.

Authors:  Sonia Barroso; Emilia Herrera-Moyano; Sergio Muñoz; María García-Rubio; Belén Gómez-González; Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Error-free DNA damage tolerance pathway is facilitated by the Irc5 translocase through cohesin.

Authors:  Ireneusz Litwin; Tomasz Bakowski; Barnabas Szakal; Ewa Pilarczyk; Ewa Maciaszczyk-Dziubinska; Dana Branzei; Robert Wysocki
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  DNA Damage Tolerance Pathway Choice Through Uls1 Modulation of Srs2 SUMOylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Karol Kramarz; Seweryn Mucha; Ireneusz Litwin; Anna Barg-Wojas; Robert Wysocki; Dorota Dziadkowiec
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  DNA Replication Stress Phosphoproteome Profiles Reveal Novel Functional Phosphorylation Sites on Xrs2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Dongqing Huang; Brian D Piening; Jacob J Kennedy; Chenwei Lin; Corey W Jones-Weinert; Ping Yan; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Mcm10 deficiency causes defective-replisome-induced mutagenesis and a dependency on error-free postreplicative repair.

Authors:  Jordan R Becker; Hai Dang Nguyen; Xiaohan Wang; Anja-Katrin Bielinsky
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Strand-specific analysis shows protein binding at replication forks and PCNA unloading from lagging strands when forks stall.

Authors:  Chuanhe Yu; Haiyun Gan; Junhong Han; Zhi-Xiong Zhou; Shaodong Jia; Andrei Chabes; Gianrico Farrugia; Tamas Ordog; Zhiguo Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 10.  Causes and consequences of replication stress.

Authors:  Michelle K Zeman; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 28.824

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.